Cited by 130Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringMuscle activation and electromyography studiesNerve Injury and Rehabilitation

Targeted reinnervation for transhumeral amputees: current surgical technique and update on results

Dumanian, Gregory A., Ko, Jason H., O’Shaughnessy, Kristina D., Kim, Peter S., Wilson, Christopher J., Kuiken, Todd A.·2009·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Targeted reinnervation in upper extremity transhumeral amputees can improve control and dexterity of myoelectric prostheses. The operation as described previously required a long residual limb and the presence of a brachialis muscle. METHODS: Brachial plexus dissections were performed to confirm and better understand the branching pattern of the radial nerve in the upper arm. A simplified surgical approach for targeted reinnervation in transhumeral amputees was devised. This study reports on the first six transhumeral amputees who have undergone this simplified procedure. RESULTS: The long and lateral heads of the triceps receive distinct and separate motor nerves from the proximal radial nerve. This anatomy allows a nerve transfer of the distal radial nerve to the motor nerve of the lateral head of the triceps without injury to the innervation of the long head of the triceps. The median nerve transfer to the motor branch of the medial head of the biceps is performed on the anterior surface of the arm as described previously. All six patients had successful targeted reinnervation procedures using this simplified approach. CONCLUSION: Targeted reinnervation for transhumeral amputees can now be performed in patients with amputations at the level of the middle of the humerus or longer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/prs.0b013e3181b038c9

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TR has demonstrated success in improving motor control signals for both transhumeral and shoulder disarticulation amputation.

    “It has demonstrated a success in improving the motor control signals for both transhumeral and shoulder disarticulation amputation (Dumanian et al., 2009).”

    From Selectivity and Longevity of Peripheral-Nerve and Machine Interfaces: A Review. (2017) · cites this paper as Dumanian et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dumanian, G. A., Ko, J. H., O’Shaughnessy, K. D., Kim, P. S., Wilson, C. J., & Kuiken, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (US)
  • Brooke Army Medical Center (US)
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2009-09
Volume
124
Issue
3
Pages
863-869
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974066308
Cited by
130
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
Keywords
transhumeral amputation, myoelectric prosthesis, median nerve transfer, biceps brachii, brachial plexus, nerve transfer
MeSH terms
Amputation Stumps, Artificial Limbs, Electromyography, Humans, Median Nerve, Motor Neurons, Nerve Transfer, Muscle, Skeletal, Upper Extremity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review