Cited by 127Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentRadiation Dose and Imaging

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

2016 SCCT/STR guidelines for coronary artery calcium scoring of noncontrast noncardiac chest CT scans: A report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society of Thoracic Radiology

Abstract

The Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) and the Society of Thoracic Radiology (STR) have jointly produced this document. Experts in this subject have been selected from both organizations to examine subject-specific data and write this guideline in partnership. A formal literature review, weighing the strength of evidence has been performed. When available, information from studies on cost was considered. Computed tomography (CT) acquisition, CAC scoring methodologies and clinical outcomes are the primary basis for the recommendations in this guideline. This guideline is intended to assist healthcare providers in clinical decision making. The recommendations reflect a consensus after a thorough review of the best available current scientific evidence and practice patterns of experts in the field and are intended to improve patient care while acknowledging that situations arise where additional information may be needed to better inform patient care.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/rti.0000000000000287

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Elias-Smale, 2010, Coronary calcium score improves classification of coronary heart disease risk in the elderly: the Rotterdam study, J Am Coll Cardiol, 56, 1407, 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.029 · DOI
  2. De Koning, 2015, Design and recruitment of the ROBINSCA trial: screening for cardiovascular disease. Ongoing randomized trial on the effect of coronary calcium on clinical outcomes, Euro Heart J, 36, S985
  3. McClelland, 2015, 10-Year coronary heart disease risk prediction using coronary artery calcium and traditional risk factors: derivation in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic study of atherosclerosis) with validation in the HNR (Heinz nixdorf Recall) study and the DHS (Dallas heart study), JAm Coll Cardiol, 66, 1643, 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.035 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 127

Metadata

Authors
Hecht, H. S., Cronin, P., Blaha, M. J., Budoff, M. J., Kazerooni, E. A., Narula, J., Yankelevitz, D., & Abbara, S.
Affiliations
  • Lenox Hill Heart & Vascular Institute, New York, NY, United States
  • Michigan Medicine (US)
  • Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
  • Harbor–UCLA Medical Center (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Abbara, Suhny
Venue
Journal of Thoracic Imaging
Published
2017-09
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
W54-W66
ISSN
0883-5993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012792572
Cited by
127
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 4
FWCI
10.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Thoracic Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
Keywords
coronary artery calcium scoring, CT acquisition parameters, clinical outcomes, cardiovascular risk stratification, clinical decision-making
MeSH terms
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Vessels, Humans, Societies, Medical, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Vascular Calcification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review