Cited by 4Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

Correction of prominent ears: postauricular muscle relocation and fibrofatty tissue excision.

Mehmet, Gunay Murat, Baklaci, Deniz·2021·Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Abstract

ABSTRACT: In this study, we modified the combined Mustarde and Furnas type otoplasty technique and evaluated the postoperative results of the patients for symmetry and complications. Eighty prominent ears in 42 patients who underwent otoplasty between January 2017 and April 2019 were included in this study. The authors determined the amount of postauricular subcutaneous tissue to be removed according to the shape of skin incision and relocated the postauricular muscle as an adjunct to the Mustarde and Furnas otoplasty technique. All patients were followed-up at least 12 months postoperatively. The patients were also evaluated for early postoperative complications (bleeding, hematoma, perichondritis, wound infection, and skin necrosis), late postoperative complications (asymmetry, hypertrophic scars, suture extrusion, and recurrence), and patient satisfaction using objective and subjective methods.Considering all the patients, early complications consisted of minimal low-flow bleeding (n = 4 ears/4 patients), hematoma (n = 1), and perichondritis (n = 1). Late complications consisted of suture extrusion (n = 2 ears/2 patients), hypertrophic scars (n = 2 ears/2 patients), and asymmetry (n = 1). None of the patients presented with wound infection or skin necrosis. Revision otoplasty was unilaterally performed in only 1 patient with the complaint of asymmetry. A natural-looking, adequate correction, and symmetric ear shape were achieved in all patients except 1. In terms of patient satisfaction, 38 of 42 patients evaluated the outcome as "very good," 3 as "good," and only 1 as "poor." Our modified technique produced very satisfactory results and reduced the postoperative complication and asymmetry rates, as well as eliminating recurrence. The authors recommend this simple and safe procedure with excellent outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/scs.0000000000007480

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mehmet and Baklaci refined the Mustardé-Furnas technique by tailoring postauricular tissue removal and muscle repositioning, reducing recurrence.

    “Mehmet and Baklaci95 refined the Mustardé–Furnas technique by tailoring postauricular tissue removal and muscle repositioning, reducing recurrence.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehmet, G. M., & Baklaci, D.
Affiliations
  • Kahta State Hospital, Department of Otolaryngology, Adiyaman
  • Bülent Ecevit University, School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Venue
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2021-01-28
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
e530-e533
ISSN
  • 1049-2275 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-3732
OpenAlex
W3127301966
Cited by
4
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
prominent ears, otoplasty, postoperative complications, ear asymmetry, hypertrophic scars, recurrence, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Ear Diseases, Ear, External, Humans, Muscles, Suture Techniques, Treatment Outcome, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Dermatologic Surgical Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review