Cited by 24Neuroscience and Music PerceptionNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismPhonetics and Phonology Research

Who is telling what from where? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study

Mathiak, Klaus, Menning, Hans, Hertrich, Ingo, Mathiak, Krystyna A., Zvyagintsev, Mikhail, Ackermann, Hermann·2007·Neuroreport

Abstract

The human central-auditory system exhibits distinct lateralization effects (speech, space) and encompasses different processing pathways (where, what, who). Using spatialized pseudoword utterances, attentional modulation of the networks bound to sound source localization ('where'), voice recognition ('who'), and the encoding of phonetic-linguistic information ('what') was evaluated by silent functional magnetic resonance imaging. The 'where'-pathway was found to be restricted to posterior parts of the left superior temporal gyrus, speaker ('auditory face') identification exclusively activated temporal lobe structures, and the representation of the sound structure of the utterances was associated with hemodynamic activation of Broca's area. Speech perception in space, therefore, engages at least three distinct neural networks. Furthermore, the findings indicate that voice recognition may depend upon template matching within auditory association cortex whereas the sequencing of phonetic-linguistic information extends to frontal areas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wnr.0b013e328013cec4

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mathiak, K., Menning, H., Hertrich, I., Mathiak, K. A., Zvyagintsev, M., & Ackermann, H.
Affiliations
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Mathiak, Klaus
  • Mathiak, Krystyna A.
Venue
Neuroreport
Published
2007-03
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
405-409
ISSN
0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075768268
Cited by
24
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroreport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca Foundation
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
auditory lateralization, sound localization, voice recognition, speaker identification, superior temporal gyrus, Broca's area, auditory association cortex, template matching, artificial neural networks
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Attention, Auditory Cortex, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Phonetics, Sound Localization, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review