Cited by 65Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryChild and Animal Learning Development

Theory of mind and its relevance in schizophrenia

Biedermann, Falko, Frajo-Apor, Beatrice, Hofer, Alex·2012·Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Social cognitive impairments are considered to be core features of schizophrenia and have been hypothesized to play a mediator role between basic neurocognition and patients' outcomes. In this context, theory of mind (ToM) abilities are of special relevance, and deficits in this area may represent trait markers of schizophrenia. RECENT FINDINGS: In this review, studies published since September 2010 have been summarized with a particular focus on the relationships between ToM and psychopathology, neurocognition, and psychosocial outcomes in patients with schizophrenia, as well as on ToM abilities in high-risk individuals. In addition, recent neuroimaging data as well as treatment interventions have been described. SUMMARY: The reviewed literature strengthens the hypothesis that ToM deficits have the potential to be valid markers for schizophrenia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yco.0b013e3283503624

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-level social priors may be particularly influential in the perception and beliefs of those with psychotic symptoms.

    “Consequently, high-level social priors may be particularly influential in the perception and beliefs of those with psychotic symptoms (110).”

    From The Predictive Coding Account of Psychosis (2018) · cites this paper as [110]

  • Aberrant predictive coding could account for the social content of psychotic symptoms and explain why they persist, and even strengthen, in the face of efforts to refute them.

    “This could account for the social content of psychotic symptoms, but may also explain why they persist, and even strengthen, in the face of efforts to refute them (110).”

    From The Predictive Coding Account of Psychosis (2018) · cites this paper as [110]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biedermann, F., Frajo-Apor, B., & Hofer, A.
Affiliations
Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
Corresponding author
Hofer, Alex
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Published
2012-03
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
71-75
ISSN
0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2322765687
Cited by
65
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
theory of mind, schizophrenia, social cognition, neurocognitive function, trait markers, psychopathology, psychosocial outcomes, high-risk individuals, neuroimaging, therapeutic interventions
MeSH terms
Cognition Disorders, Humans, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Theory of Mind, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review