Cited by 56Schizophrenia research and treatmentHallucinations in medical conditionsMental Health and Psychiatry

The 5% difference: early sensory processing predicts sarcasm perception in schizophrenia and schizo-affective disorder

Open access
Kantrowitz, J. T., Hoptman, M. J., Leitman, D. I., Silipo, G., Javitt, D. C.·2014·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: Intact sarcasm perception is a crucial component of social cognition and mentalizing (the ability to understand the mental state of oneself and others). In sarcasm, tone of voice is used to negate the literal meaning of an utterance. In particular, changes in pitch are used to distinguish between sincere and sarcastic utterances. Schizophrenia patients show well-replicated deficits in auditory function and functional connectivity (FC) within and between auditory cortical regions. In this study we investigated the contributions of auditory deficits to sarcasm perception in schizophrenia. Method: Auditory measures including pitch processing, auditory emotion recognition (AER) and sarcasm detection were obtained from 76 patients with schizophrenia/schizo-affective disorder and 72 controls. Resting-state FC (rsFC) was obtained from a subsample and was analyzed using seeds placed in both auditory cortex and meta-analysis-defined core-mentalizing regions relative to auditory performance. Results: Patients showed large effect-size deficits across auditory measures. Sarcasm deficits correlated significantly with general functioning and impaired pitch processing both across groups and within the patient group alone. Patients also showed reduced sensitivity to alterations in mean pitch and variability. For patients, sarcasm discrimination correlated exclusively with the level of rsFC within primary auditory regions whereas for controls, correlations were observed exclusively within core-mentalizing regions (the right posterior superior temporal gyrus, anterior superior temporal sulcus and insula, and left posterior medial temporal gyrus). Conclusions: These findings confirm the contribution of auditory deficits to theory of mind (ToM) impairments in schizophrenia, and demonstrate that FC within auditory, but not core-mentalizing, regions is rate limiting with respect to sarcasm detection in schizophrenia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291713000834

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deficits in tone matching contribute significantly to communications such as sarcasm that require patients to appreciate what another person may be thinking (theory of mind).

    “as well as to communications such as sarcasm that require patients to appreciate what another person may be thinking (76, 77), a trait called “theory of mind”, a form of empathy.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured clinical interview for Axis I DSM-IV disorders - Patient edition (SCID-I/P) 1994 New York Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kantrowitz, J. T., Hoptman, M. J., Leitman, D. I., Silipo, G., & Javitt, D. C.
Affiliations
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Kantrowitz, J. T.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2013-04-24
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
25-36
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2125870861
Cited by
56
References
65
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Genentech
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R37MH049334, R37MH49334, R01MH084848, P50MH086385, K01MH094689, R01MH064783, R01MH049334, R21MH084031)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA03383, R01DA003383)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024156)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, auditory deficits, pitch processing, auditory emotion recognition, resting-state functional connectivity, theory of mind, mentalization, social cognition, auditory cortex, posterior superior temporal gyrus, insula
MeSH terms
Adult, Auditory Cortex, Auditory Perception, Brain, Emotions, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Pathways, Pitch Perception, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Social Perception, Speech Perception, Case-Control Studies, Pattern Recognition, Physiological, Young Adult, Theory of Mind, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review