Cited by 19Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

Actigraphy in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Undergoing Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: An Open Label Pilot Study

Nishida, Masaki, Kikuchi, Senichiro, Nisijima, Koichi, Suda, Shiro·2017·The Journal of ECT

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on physical activity and sleep patterns in individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) remain unclear. METHOD: We examined the effects of rTMS treatment on the rest-activity cycle and sleep disturbances in MDD. In this open-label pilot study, 14 patients with medication-resistant MDD underwent 10 rTMS sessions over the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. In addition to Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores, waist actigraphy was used to evaluate alterations in the rest-activity cycle over the course of rTMS treatments. Actigraphic data were evaluated at baseline and in the first (rTMS sessions 1-3), second (rTMS sessions 4-7), and third (rTMS sessions 8-10) sections. RESULTS: Although Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores were significantly improved by rTMS, sleep variables assessed by actigraphy did not show significant changes. However, post hoc tests indicated a significant increase in mean steps per day between the baseline and first section time points (P = 0.014; t13 = -2.316). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicated that a daytime physical activity response to rTMS occurred in early sessions, whereas subjective symptom improvements were consistent across all sessions. Future double-blind placebo-controlled studies assessing the effects of rTMS on the rest-activity cycle and sleep disturbances in MDD are warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yct.0000000000000352

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nishida, M., Kikuchi, S., Nisijima, K., & Suda, S.
Affiliations
Jichi Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Nishida, Masaki
  • Kikuchi, Senichiro
  • Nisijima, Koichi
  • Suda, Shiro
Venue
The Journal of ECT
Published
2017-03
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
36-42
ISSN
  • 1095-0680 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4112
OpenAlex
W2507470169
Cited by
19
References
54
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Ect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Jichi Medical University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, major depressive disorder, actigraphy, rest-activity cycle, sleep disorders, physical activity, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, treatment-resistant depression, step count
MeSH terms
Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Sleep, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Actigraphy, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review