The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The mechanics and energetics of human walking and running: a joint level perspective
Open accessAbstract
Humans walk and run at a range of speeds. While steady locomotion at a given speed requires no net mechanical work, moving faster does demand both more positive and negative mechanical work per stride. Is this increased demand met by increasing power output at all lower limb joints or just some of them? Does running rely on different joints for power output than walking? How does this contribute to the metabolic cost of locomotion? This study examined the effects of walking and running speed on lower limb joint mechanics and metabolic cost of transport in humans. Kinematic and kinetic data for 10 participants were collected for a range of walking (0.75, 1.25, 1.75, 2.0 m s−1) and running (2.0, 2.25, 2.75, 3.25 m s−1) speeds. Net metabolic power was measured by indirect calorimetry. Within each gait, there was no difference in the proportion of power contributed by each joint (hip, knee, ankle) to total power across speeds. Changing from walking to running resulted in a significant (p = 0.02) shift in power production from the hip to the ankle which may explain the higher efficiency of running at speeds above 2.0 m s−1 and shed light on a potential mechanism behind the walk–run transition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Energetics of running: a new perspective
Kram, R., & Taylor, C. R. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/346265a0 · Cited by 821
Biomechanical and physiological aspects of legged locomotion in humans
Saibene, F., & Minetti, A. E. (2003) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-002-0654-9 · Cited by 437
Cited by
A biologically-inspired multi-joint soft exosuit that can reduce the energy cost of loaded walking
Panizzolo, F. A., Galiana, I., Asbeck, A. T., Siviy, C., Schmidt, K., Holt, K. G., & Walsh, C. J. (2016) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-016-0150-9 · Cited by 291
Rethinking the evolution of the human foot: insights from experimental research
Holowka, N. B., & Lieberman, D. E. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.174425 · Cited by 135
A review of current state-of-the-art control methods for lower-limb powered prostheses
Gehlhar, R., Tucker, M., Young, A. J., & Ames, A. D. (2023) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2023.03.003 · Cited by 131
Task-agnostic exoskeleton control via biological joint moment estimation
Molinaro, D. D., Scherpereel, K. L., Schonhaut, E. B., Evangelopoulos, G., Shepherd, M. K., & Young, A. J. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08157-7 · Cited by 107
Metabolic Costs of Standing and Walking in Healthy Military-Age Adults: A Meta-regression
LOONEY, D. P., POTTER, A. W., PRYOR, J. L., BREMNER, P. E., CHALMERS, C. R., MCCLUNG, H. L., WELLES, A. P., & SANTEE, W. R. (2019) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000001779 · Cited by 37
Abe, D., Fukuoka, Y., & Horiuchi, M. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138154 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Farris, D. J., & Sawicki, G. S.
- Venue
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2011-05-25
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 66
- Pages
- 110-118
- ISSN
- 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-5689
- OpenAlex
- W2102653827
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.