Cited by 58

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multi-omic detection of Mycobacterium leprae in archaeological human dental calculus

Fotakis, Anna K., Denham, Sean D., Mackie, Meaghan, Orbegozo, Miren Iraeta, Mylopotamitaki, Dorothea, Gopalakrishnan, Shyam, Sicheritz-Pontén, Thomas, Olsen, Jesper V., Cappellini, Enrico, Zhang, Guojie, Christophersen, Axel, Gilbert, M. Thomas P., Vågene, Åshild J.·2020·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Mineralized dental plaque (calculus) has proven to be an excellent source of ancient biomolecules. Here we present a Mycobacterium leprae genome (6.6-fold), the causative agent of leprosy, recovered via shotgun sequencing of sixteenth-century human dental calculus from an individual from Trondheim, Norway. When phylogenetically placed, this genome falls in branch 3I among the diversity of other contemporary ancient strains from Northern Europe. Moreover, ancient mycobacterial peptides were retrieved via mass spectrometry-based proteomics, further validating the presence of the pathogen. Mycobacterium leprae can readily be detected in the oral cavity and associated mucosal membranes, which likely contributed to it being incorporated into this individual's dental calculus. This individual showed some possible, but not definitive, evidence of skeletal lesions associated with early-stage leprosy. This study is the first known example of successful multi-omics retrieval of M. leprae from archaeological dental calculus. Furthermore, we offer new insights into dental calculus as an alternative sample source to bones or teeth for detecting and molecularly characterizing M. leprae in individuals from the archaeological record. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Insights into health and disease from ancient biomolecules’.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2019.0584

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies of ancient human remains work with historic dental calculus, a stable long-term reservoir of proteins.

    “When it comes to analyzing ancient human remains, most studies work with historic dental calculus [11, 15, 22-26], as it is a stable, long-term reservoir of proteins [27].”

    From Metaproteomic analysis of King Ghezo tomb wall (Abomey, Benin) confirms 19th century voodoo sacrifices (2024) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Introduction describes archaeological dental calculus as a reservoir of ancient biomolecules, including proteomic information, and the Conclusion says its robust nature makes long-term preservation likely. The paper does not establish that most studies of ancient human remains use dental calculus; it presents calculus as an alternative to bones and teeth. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 83

  1. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0376 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/ng.2906 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/srep07104 · DOI · Paper page
  4. De La Fuente CP, 2012, Human bacterial DNA from dental calculus: a new source of genetic material, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 147, 127
  5. 10.1038/ng.2536 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/s41467-018-07148-3 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1007/s11306-017-1270-3 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.ijpp.2018.05.001 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/978-3-540-75855-6_7 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/ajpa.20363 · DOI
  11. 10.1017/S0025727300030118 · DOI
  12. Kazda J, 1990, Acid-fast bacilli found in sphagnum vegetation of coastal Norway containing Mycobacterium leprae-specific phenolic glycolipid-I, Int. J. Lepr. Other Mycobact. Dis., 58, 353
  13. 10.1126/science.1238286 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006997 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s41467-018-03857-x · DOI
  16. 10.1186/1471-2164-15-270 · DOI
  17. Roberts CA, 2010, The archaeology of disease
  18. Buikstra JE, 1994, Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains
  19. 10.1017/CBO9780511542428.005 · DOI
  20. 10.1017/CBO9780511812569 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/2041-210X.12871 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/gigascience/gix049 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1101/gr.128124.111 · DOI
  24. 10.1186/s13104-016-1900-2 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/nmeth.1923 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/nprot.2014.063 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1038/nature11234 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x · DOI
  29. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1038/s41559-017-0446-6 · DOI
  31. 10.1101/gr.5969107 · DOI
  32. 10.1186/s13059-016-0918-z · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Okonechnikov K, 2016, Qualimap 2: advanced multi-sample quality control for high-throughput sequencing data, Bioinformatics, 32, 292, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv566 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1101/gr.107524.110 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1038/nature13591 · DOI · Paper page
  38. R Development Core Team, 2013, R: a language and environment for statistical computing
  39. 10.1111/1469-0691.12609 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/ng.477 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/cid/ciw572 · DOI
  42. 10.1126/science.aah3783 · DOI
  43. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005598 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/s41467-017-02576-z · DOI
  45. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006190 · DOI
  46. 10.1073/pnas.1421504112 · DOI
  47. Yuan Y, 2015, Characterization of Mycobacterium leprae genotypes in China—identification of a new polymorphism C251 T in the 16S rRNA gene, PLoS ONE, 10, e0133268, 10.1371/journal.pone.0133268 · DOI
  48. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1093/molbev/msy096 · DOI
  50. 10.4161/fly.19695 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.7554/eLife.17092 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1021/pr500985w · DOI
  53. 10.1038/nbt.1511 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1021/pr101065j · DOI
  55. 10.1093/nar/gku989 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1002/oa.1390020204 · DOI
  57. van der Sluis LG, 2016, A palaeodietary investigation of a multi-period churchyard in Stavanger, Norway, using stable isotope analysis (C, N, H, S) on bone collagen, J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep., 9, 120
  58. 10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16947 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1017/S0033822200033865 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1056/NEJMoa1010536 · DOI
  61. 10.1002/pmic.200400945 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.jas.2016.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1038/s41598-018-28091-9 · DOI
  64. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000166 · DOI
  65. 10.1093/gigascience/gix133 · DOI
  66. Draper P, 1976, Cell walls of Mycobacterium leprae, Int. J. Lepr. Other Mycobact. Dis., 44, 95
  67. 10.1073/pnas.85.6.1917 · DOI
  68. 10.1128/IAI.66.6.2625-2631.1998 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00142-2 · DOI
  70. Mackie M, 2017, Preservation of the metaproteome: variability of protein preservation in ancient dental calculus, Sci. Technol. Archaeol. Res., 3, 74
  71. 10.1016/0030-4220(76)90152-3 · DOI
  72. Bechelli LM, 1939, Lesões lepróticas da mucosa bucal: estudo clínico, Rev. Bras. Leprol., 7, 187
  73. 10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30962-9 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/0030-4220(62)90153-6 · DOI
  75. Girdhar BK, 1979, A clinical study of the mouth in untreated lepromatous patients, Lepr. Rev., 50, 25
  76. Scheepers A, 1993, Oral manifestations of leprosy, Lepr. Rev., 64, 37
  77. 10.1046/j.1354-523X.2003.00981.x · DOI
  78. 10.1371/journal.pone.0185966 · DOI
  79. Grankvist R, 1982, Nidaros kirkes spital 700 år: Trondhjems hospital 1277-1977
  80. Reed I, 1998, Excavations outside the west front of Nidaros Cathedral in Trondheim
  81. Hamre SS, 2016, Stable oxygen isotope evidence for mobility in medieval and post-medieval Trondheim, Norway, J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep., 8, 416
  82. 10.1002/ajpa.21185 · DOI
  83. Vizcaíno JA et al. 2016 2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 44 11033. (doi:10.1093/nar/gkw880) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fotakis, A. K., Denham, S. D., Mackie, M., Orbegozo, M. I., Mylopotamitaki, D., Gopalakrishnan, S., Sicheritz-Pontén, T., Olsen, J. V., Cappellini, E., Zhang, G., Christophersen, A., Gilbert, M. T. P., & Vågene, Å. J.
Affiliations
  • Section for Evolutionary Genomics, GLOBE Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
  • Museum of Archaeology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
  • Novo Nordisk Foundation Centre for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Section for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
  • NTNU University Museum, Trondheim, Norway
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2020-10-05
Volume
375
Issue
1812
Pages
20190584
ISSN
  • 0962-8436
  • 1471-2970
Cited by
58
References
8
Language
en
Funders
  • Carlsbergfondet (CF18-1109)
  • Villum Fonden (17649)
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF14CC0001)
  • Lundbeckfonden (KU2016, R52-A5062)
  • Norges Forskningsråd (MEDHEAL600)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review