Cited by 562

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of ancient and modern genomes by SNP detection and phylogenomic and metagenomic analysis using PALEOMIX

Schubert, Mikkel, Ermini, Luca, Sarkissian, Clio Der, Jónsson, Hákon, Ginolhac, Aurélien, Schaefer, Robert, Martin, Michael D, Fernández, Ruth, Kircher, Martin, McCue, Molly, Willerslev, Eske, Orlando, Ludovic·2014·Nature Protocols

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2014.063

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is still no consensus on a gold-standard way for carrying out or reporting most ancient genomic analyses.

    “While some guidelines exist for the analysis of ancient genomic data, for example for mapping 162,181,183 or data authentication 56,57,329 , and automated tools embedding critical analytical procedures within open-source pipelines are available 187,188,241,242 , there is still no consensus on a”

    From Ancient DNA analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [187]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Thurman, R.E. et al. The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome. Nature 489, 75–82 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ball, M.P. et al. Targeted and genome-scale strategies reveal gene-body methylation signatures in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 361–368 (2009). · DOI
  3. Overballe-Petersen, S., Orlando, L. & Willerslev, E. Next-generation sequencing offers new insights into DNA degradation. Trends Biotechnol. 30, 364–368 (2012). · DOI
  4. Margulies, M. et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437, 376–380 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Poinar, H.N. et al. Metagenomics to paleogenomics: large-scale sequencing of mammoth DNA. Science 311, 392–394 (2006). · DOI
  6. Miller, W. et al. Sequencing the nuclear genome of the extinct woolly mammoth. Nature 456, 387–390 (2008). · DOI
  7. Green, R.E. et al. A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome. Science 328, 710–722 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Krause, J. et al. The complete mitochondrial DNA genome of an unknown hominin from southern Siberia. Nature 464, 894–897 (2010). · DOI
  9. Orlando, L. et al. Recalibrating Equus evolution using the genome sequence of an early Middle Pleistocene horse. Nature 499, 74–78 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Millar, C.D. & Lambert, D.M. Ancient DNA: towards a million-year-old genome. Nature 499, 34–35 (2013). · DOI
  11. Skoglund, P. et al. Origins and genetic legacy of Neolithic farmers and hunter-gatherers in Europe. Science 336, 466–469 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Miller, W. et al. Polar and brown bear genomes reveal ancient admixture and demographic footprints of past climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2382–E2390 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gilbert, M.T. et al. Intraspecific phylogenetic analysis of Siberian woolly mammoths using complete mitochondrial genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 8327–8332 (2008). · DOI
  14. Gilbert, M.T. et al. Paleo-Eskimo mtDNA genome reveals matrilineal discontinuity in Greenland. Science 320, 1787–1789 (2008). · DOI
  15. Bon, C. et al. Coprolites as a source of information on the genome and diet of the cave hyena. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279, 2825–2830 (2012). · DOI
  16. Lari, M. et al. The complete mitochondrial genome of an 11,450-year-old aurochsen (Bos primigenius) from Central Italy. BMC Evol. Biol. 11, 32 (2011). · DOI
  17. Vilstrup, J.T. et al. Mitochondrial phylogenomics of modern and ancient equids. PLoS ONE 8, e55950 (2013). · DOI
  18. Haus, T. et al. Mitochondrial diversity and distribution of African green monkeys (Chlorocebus Gray, 1870). Am. J. Primatol. 75, 350–360 (2013). · DOI
  19. Burbano, H.A. et al. Targeted investigation of the Neandertal genome by array-based sequence capture. Science 328, 723–725 (2010). · DOI
  20. Bos, K.I. et al. A draft genome of Yersinia pestis from victims of the Black Death. Nature 478, 506–510 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  21. McKenna, A. et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Wang, K., Li, M. & Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e164 (2010). · DOI
  23. Krause, J. et al. A complete mtDNA genome of an early modern human from Kostenki, Russia. Curr. Biol. 20, 231–236 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Martin, M.D. et al. Reconstructing genome evolution in historic samples of the Irish potato famine pathogen. Nat. Commun. 4, 2172 (2013). · DOI
  25. Yoshida, K. et al. The rise and fall of the Phytophthora infestans lineage that triggered the Irish potato famine. Elife 2, e00731 (2013). · DOI
  26. Kircher, M. Analysis of high-throughput ancient DNA sequencing data. Methods Mol. Biol. 840, 197–228 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  27. Goecks, J., Nekrutenko, A. & Taylor, J. Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol. 11, R86 (2010). · DOI
  28. Lindgreen, S. AdapterRemoval: easy cleaning of next-generation sequencing reads. BMC Res. Notes 5, 337 (2012). · DOI
  29. Briggs, A.W. et al. Removal of deaminated cytosines and detection of in vivo methylation in ancient DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e87 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  31. Briggs, A.W. et al. Patterns of damage in genomic DNA sequences from a Neandertal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 14616–14621 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  32. McLaren, W. et al. Deriving the consequences of genomic variants with the Ensembl API and SNP Effect Predictor. Bioinformatics 26, 2069–2070 (2010). · DOI
  33. de Queiroz, A. & Gatesy, J. The supermatrix approach to systematics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 34–41 (2007). · DOI
  34. Fierer, N. et al. Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 21390–21395 (2012). · DOI
  35. Cotillard, A. et al. Dietary intervention impact on gut microbial gene richness. Nature 500, 585–588 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  36. Schloissnig, S. et al. Genomic variation landscape of the human gut microbiome. Nature 493, 45–50 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  37. Huson, D.H., Richter, D.C., Mitra, S., Auch, A.F. & Schuster, S.C. Methods for comparative metagenomics. BMC Bioinformatics 10 (suppl. 1), S12 (2009). · DOI
  38. Der Sarkissian, C., Ermini, L., Jónsson, H., Alekseev, A.N., Crubezy, E., Shapiro, B. & Orlando, L. Shotgun microbial profiling of fossil remains. Mol. Ecol. 10.1111/mec.12690 (2014). · DOI
  39. Ondov, B.D., Bergman, N.H. & Phillippy, A.M. Interactive metagenomic visualization in a Web browser. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 385 (2011). · DOI
  40. Suzuki, R. & Shimodaira, H. Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics 22, 1540–1542 (2006). · DOI
  41. Daley, T. & Smith, A.D. Predicting the molecular complexity of sequencing libraries. Nat. Methods 10, 325–327 (2013). · DOI
  42. Li, H. Tabix: fast retrieval of sequence features from generic TAB-delimited files. Bioinformatics 27, 718–719 (2011). · DOI
  43. Venables, W.N. & Ripley,, B.D. Modern Applied Statistics with S (Springer, 2002). · DOI
  44. Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  45. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, 2009). · DOI · Paper page
  46. Haas, B.J. et al. Genome sequence and analysis of the Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Nature 461, 393–398 (2009). · DOI
  47. Avila-Adame, C. et al. Mitochondrial genome sequences and molecular evolution of the Irish potato famine pathogen, Phytophthora infestans. Curr. Genet. 49, 39–46 (2006). · DOI
  48. Cock, P.J., Fields, C.J., Goto, N., Heuer, M.L. & Rice, P.M. The Sanger FASTQ file format for sequences with quality scores, and the Solexa/Illumina FASTQ variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 1767–1771 (2010). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schubert, M., Ermini, L., Sarkissian, C. D., Jónsson, H., Ginolhac, A., Schaefer, R., Martin, M. D., Fernández, R., Kircher, M., McCue, M., Willerslev, E., & Orlando, L.
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2014-04-10
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
1056-1082
ISSN
  • 1754-2189
  • 1750-2799
Cited by
562
References
28
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review