The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 8 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
De novo protein design by deep network hallucination
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41586-021-04184-w · Paper page
Abstract
There has been considerable recent progress in protein structure prediction using deep neural networks to infer distance constraints from amino acid residue co-evolution 1–3 . We investigated whether the information captured by such networks is sufficiently rich to generate new folded proteins with sequences unrelated to those of the naturally occuring proteins used in training the models. We generated random amino acid sequences, and input them into the trRosetta structure prediction network to predict starting distance maps, which as expected are quite featureless. We then carried out Monte Carlo sampling in amino acid sequence space, optimizing the contrast (KL-divergence) between the distance distributions predicted by the network and the background distribution. Optimization from different random starting points resulted in a wide range of proteins with diverse sequences and all alpha, all beta sheet, and mixed alpha-beta structures. We obtained synthetic genes encoding 129 of these network hallucinated sequences, expressed and purified the proteins in E coli, and found that 27 folded to monomeric stable structures with circular dichroism spectra consistent with the hallucinated structures. Thus deep networks trained to predict native protein structures from their sequences can be inverted to design new proteins, and such networks and methods should contribute, alongside traditional physically based models, to the de novo design of proteins with new functions.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The authors invert the trRosetta structure-prediction network by Monte Carlo sampling in amino acid sequence space to “hallucinate” new 100-residue proteins with sequences unrelated to native proteins. Of 129 selected designs expressed in E. coli, 27 folded to monodisperse species with CD spectra matching the hallucinated structures, and three experimentally solved structures closely matched the models.
Key findings
- Hallucinated sequences had very low similarity to native proteins, with best BLAST E-values to UniProt of ~0.1, while their predicted structures had TM-align scores of 0.6–0.9 to native PDB structures.
- Of 129 hallucinated proteins expressed and purified from E. coli, 27 yielded SEC peaks corresponding to monomeric or small oligomeric species and CD spectra consistent with the target structures; 21 were highly thermostable with apparent melting temperatures above 70 °C, and alpha-beta designs showed no unfolding transitions up to 95 °C.
- In orthogonal Rosetta folding simulations, 82 of 129 designs had lowest-energy structures close to the hallucinated structures with Cα-RMSDs <3.0 Å, and for all 129 the design model was lower in energy than any structure obtained from an extended chain.
- Experimental structures matched hallucinated models: NMR structure of design 0515 had ~1.84 Å Cα RMSD to the model; X-ray structure of 0217 at 2.9 Å resolution had 2.53 Å backbone RMSD over all 100 residues; X-ray structure of 0738_mod at 2.4 Å resolution had 3.68 Å Cα RMSD over 96 residues, with N- and C-terminal halves aligning at 1.32 Å over 57 residues and 2.17 Å over 43 residues.
Methods
- The trRosetta network predicts inter-residue distance and orientation distributions from sequence; a background network with similar architecture but no amino acid sequence identity information provided a reference distribution. The objective combined KL-divergence of trRosetta predictions from the background with negative KL-divergence of amino acid composition from PDB frequencies, optimized by simulated annealing in sequence space with 40,000 attempted moves, starting temperature 0.1 halved every 5,000 steps, cysteines excluded, and length L = 100.
- Two thousand designs were generated, clustered by TM-score into 95 clusters at a 0.75 threshold; 129 sequences from 27 structural clusters were selected for experimental testing, expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3), purified by IMAC and size-exclusion chromatography, and characterized by circular dichroism, NMR, and X-ray crystallography.
- Structural comparisons used TM-align, Theseus superposition, and Rosetta ab initio folding simulations; crystallographic data were processed with HKL2000/Scalepack and structures solved by molecular replacement.
Limitations
- The paper states that many hallucinated proteins form oligomers in solution, likely because the network incorporated sequence features from native protein-protein interfaces; surface hydrophobic substitutions were needed to produce monomeric species in some cases.
- The paper states that design 0738_mod showed multiple monomeric conformations in slow conformational exchange, and suggests that incorporating an explicit sidechain representation in the hallucination method could reduce such structural heterogeneity.
- Evident from the text: only 27 of 129 expressed designs folded to monodisperse species, only three structures were determined experimentally, one of those required surface modification, and the study did not test designed functions.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 8 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The overall distributions of hallucinated sequences and structures are very different from those of naturally occurring proteins of the same (100 residue) length which were used during trRosetta training (Extended Data Fig. 1a–e).”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“for all 129 the lowest energy structure sampled starting from the design model was lower in energy than any other structure obtained starting from an extended chain.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The hallucinated proteins are more similar to each other (blue lines) than they are to natural proteins (grey lines).”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Extended Data
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hallucinations are more ideal than natural proteins in having less loops but longer secondary structure elements.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Extended Data
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“we found that the trRosetta deep neural network trained using multiple sequence information could consistently predict structure quite accurately for de novo designed proteins from just a single sequence -- i.e., in the complete absence of co-evolution information3.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Structural superposition of the 0738 model and 0738_mod crystal structure revealed a 3.68 Å Cɑ RMSD over 96 residues”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we found that substitution of surface hydrophobic residues with polar residues in a subset of the hallucinations that formed oligomers resulted in monomeric species by SEC”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of these, 27 yielded size exclusion chromatography (SEC) peaks corresponding to monomeric or small oligomeric species”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The experimentally validated proteins span a wide range of topologies”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“trajectories started from different random sequences resulted in very different sequences and structures (Fig 1e).”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 30
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
- Probably not a substantial claim. 5
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In all cases, the CD spectra were consistent with the target structures (Figs. 3e, 4e and Extended Data Fig. 3e,k), with the characteristic profiles of all alpha helical proteins for the all alpha helical designs (Fig. 3e and Extended Data Fig. 3e), and of alpha-beta proteins for the alpha-beta designs”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“all of the sequences are predicted by Rosetta large scale energy calculations to have funneled landscapes leading into the target structure”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One of these surface-modified hallucinations, 0738_mod, yielded crystals and the 2.4 Å resolution structure was determined.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both de novo designed proteins and the hallucinated proteins generated here have regular alpha helices and beta sheets, and lack the long loops and other idiosyncrasies of native protein structures”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also succeeded in determining a 2.9 Å resolution crystal structure of design 0217, which revealed a 3-helix bundle with an overall fold similar to the hallucinated model; the backbone RMSD between model and crystal structure is 2.53 Å over all 100 residues”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The average hetNOE for the homodimer 0217 is lower than for 0515 and 0738_mod, and it has fewer peaks than expected due to exchange broadening.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Extended Data
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the N- and C-terminal halves of the crystal structure align remarkably well to the corresponding regions in the hallucinated model with backbone RMSDs of 1.32 Å over 57 residues, and 2.17 Å over 43 residues for the N-terminal and C-terminal half, respectively”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“NMR data on design 0417 are consistent with the alpha/beta fold of the hallucinated model, and both SEC and NMR relaxation measurements (15N T1 ~730 ms, 15N T2 ~77 ms, and τc ~10.4 ns at 25 °C, Extended Data Fig. 6) indicate that it is primarily monomeric but with some transient self-association in solution.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, 0217 forms a dimer in the crystal structure (Extended Data Fig. 5), consistent with SEC-MALS analysis and NMR rotational correlation time measurements”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the predicted structures resemble but are not identical to native structures in the PDB, with TM-align scores of 0.6–0.9 (Fig. 1g).”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Optimization from different random starting points results in novel proteins spanning a very wide range of sequences and predicted structures.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the 0217 model displays clear amphipathic sequence patterning across the 3-helix topology, with numerous solvent-exposed hydrophobic residues (Suppl. Fig. 2) that mediate the dimer contacts in the crystal structure.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The solution data for designs 0515 and 0217 (dimer) suggest well-ordered structures in solution, with internal dynamics typical of small natural proteins.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A single solution was found in I 2 3 from one of the ab initio models with two copies in the asymmetric unit and a TFZ score of 13.3 (no other model yielded a TFZ score >8).”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Methods > Crystallography sample preparation, data collection, and analysis.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“SEC data demonstrating monodispersity of these proteins in solution, with predominantly monomer for 0515 and 0738_mod and predominantly dimer for 0217.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Extended Data
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The accuracy does not reflect PDB memorization; the closest BLAST hits in the PDB for the N and C terminal halves have E-values of 0.29 and 0.63, respectively.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Two thousand proteins were generated using the hallucination procedure described above, and structurally compared to each other using the template modeling score (TM-score)29. Average-linkage hierarchical clustering yielded 95 clusters with an average inter-cluster similarity of TM-score = 0.75.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Methods > Design selection.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One-hundred twenty-nine hallucinated sequences from the remaining 27 structural clusters (no more than 10 designs per cluster) were selected for experimental testing.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Methods > Design selection.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The structures span all alpha, all beta and mixed alpha-beta fold classes, with 95 different sub-folds at a TM-score clustering threshold of 0.75.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We determined the solution NMR structure for design 0515 to be a monomeric antiparallel four-helix bundle (1D estimated 15N T1 ~ 780 ms, 15N T2 ~ 77 ms, and τc ~ 9.6 ns at 25 °C); the ensemble of 20 structures had a Cɑ root mean square deviation (RMSD) to the hallucinated model of ~1.84 Å”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While both sets of predictions yielded converged ensembles on a single topology, the classical ab initio models had significant diversity within that ensemble.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Methods > Crystallography sample preparation, data collection, and analysis.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although 0738_mod has a similar hetNOE distribution as monomeric 0515, it has more than double the expected number of peaks, indicating at least two folded conformations (for all or parts of the protein) in solution that are in slow conformational exchange on the NMR time-scale.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Extended Data
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“SDS-PAGE data (not shown) show that each is >95% homogeneous, which together with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry indicate that the spectral heterogeneity observed is not due to chemical heterogeneity.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Extended Data
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Random sequences give diffuse predictions, while existing de novo designs produce peaked distributions with low variance3.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Methods > Networks and objective function.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is a completely orthogonal test as the network was trained exclusively on native protein structures, and has no access to the Rosetta energy function.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For 0738_mod refinement, final Ramachandran favored and outliers were 96% and 0%, respectively.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Methods > Crystallography sample preparation, data collection, and analysis.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For 0217 final Ramachandran favored and outliers were 99% and 0%, respectively.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Methods > Crystallography sample preparation, data collection, and analysis.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many of the hallucinated proteins are monomeric, stable, have the expected secondary structure, and are strongly predicted to fold to the target structure by Rosetta in completely orthogonal calculations”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Conclusion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The network appears to incorporate sequence features associated with the protein-protein interfaces of the native oligomeric proteins included in the PDB training set, likely explaining why many of the network hallucinated proteins self associate.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even under optimized conditions, there is still evidence of exchange broadening (e.g. Trp side chain NεHs are weak), resonances that appear only at high temperature and high glycerol concentrations, and some resonances that are doubled; all indications of transient self-association.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Extended Data
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This sample was >98% homogeneous by SDS-PAGE analysis, and >95% isotope enriched based on MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Methods > NMR sample preparation.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“in benchmark tests this network outperformed other methods3.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The trRosetta protein structure prediction network, described in detail elsewhere3, is a 2D residual-convolutional neural network which takes 1- and 2-site features derived from a multiple sequence alignment or a single sequence as an input and produces a 2D output describing distances and orientations for all residue pairs in a protein in a probabilistic manner”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Methods > Networks and objective function.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This was further validated by the appearance of new peaks in spectra at lower temperature (288K), and different peaks at higher temperatures (308 and 318K), and confirmed by detection of 15N ZZ-exchange cross peaks at 318K with 600 and 750 ms mixing times (Bruker pulse sequence hsqcetexf3gp, data not shown)58.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Extended Data
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [58]
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These samples were each >~98% homogeneous, based on SDS-PAGE.”
§ De novo protein design by deep network hallucination > Methods > NMR sample preparation.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
Random amino acid sequences have a vanishingly small probability of folding to a defined structure.
“As expected for random sequences, which have a vanishingly small probability of folding to a defined structure”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The background network's predictions can be viewed as representing a generic molten globule state.
“this can loosely be viewed as representing a generic “molten globule” state”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The bi-annual Critical Assessment of Structure (CASP) meetings have demonstrated that deep learning methods such as AlphaFold (1, 2) and trRosetta (3), that extract information from the large database of known protein structures in the PDB, outperform more traditional approaches that explicitly model the folding process.”
From Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a 3-track network (2021) · cites this paper as [2]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“crystal and NMR structures confirm that the hallucinated sequences fold to the hallucinated structures (12).”
From Scaffolding protein functional sites using deep learning (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“We previously demonstrated that the trRosetta structure-prediction neural network (11) can be used to generate new proteins by maximizing the trRosetta output probability that a sequence folds to some (unspecified) three dimensional structure during Monte Carlo sampling in sequence space (12).”
From Scaffolding protein functional sites using deep learning (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“There has also been recent success in applying the hallucination technique to general protein design [72].”
From Computational and artificial intelligence-based methods for antibody development (2023) · cites this paper as [72]
In the citing paper
“The competing RoseTTAFold approach has allowed for de novo design through network hallucination by training a similar model specially for inpainting portions of proteins given context [72,83].”
From Computational and artificial intelligence-based methods for antibody development (2023) · cites this paper as [72]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
The reported resolution for 0217 differs from its table entry
MinorThe text reports a 2.9 Å crystal structure for 0217, but the crystallographic table gives its data-collection resolution as 3.0 Å.
“We also succeeded in determining a 2.9 Å resolution crystal structure of design 0217”
“| Resolution (Å) | 47.8–3.0 (3.1–3.0)b | 50.0–2.4 (2.49–2.40) |”
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
[20] Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode
Otwinowski, Z., & Minor, W. (1997) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(97)76066-x · Cited by 33,475
Features and development of Coot
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G., & Cowtan, K. (2010) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444910007493 · Cited by 29,915
Phaser crystallographic software
McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C., & Read, R. J. (2007) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889807021206 · Cited by 20,612
The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System
DeLano, W. L. (2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 18,147
NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes
Delaglio, F., Grzesiek, S., Vuister, G. W., Zhu, G., Pfeifer, J., & Bax, A. (1995) · Journal of Biomolecular NMR · doi:10.1007/bf00197809 · Cited by 15,961
Crystallography & NMR System: A New Software Suite for Macromolecular Structure Determination
Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse‐Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J., Kuszewski, J. J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N., et al. (1998) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444998003254 · Cited by 15,723
Liebschner, D., Afonine, P. V., Baker, M. L., Bunkóczi, G., Chen, V. B., Croll, T. I., Hintze, B., Hung, L.-W., Jain, S., McCoy, A. J., et al. (2019) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology · doi:10.1107/s2059798319011471 · Cited by 7,953
Protein production by auto-induction in high-density shaking cultures
Studier, F. W. (2005) · Protein Expression and Purification · doi:10.1016/j.pep.2005.01.016 · Cited by 5,949
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1101/769919 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 621
Liu, J., Ju, J., Shen, T., & Guan, X. (2025) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2025.2477777 · Cited by 1
Duan, B., & Sun, Y. (2021) · International Conference on Biological Information and Biomedical Engineering (BIBE) · doi:10.1145/3469678.3469685 · Cited by 1
Analysis of floor stability in underground coal mines
Santos, C. A. (1988) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · Cited by 1
dos Santos, L. M., & de Melo-Minardi, R. C. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-21175-1_7 · Cited by 1
Sub-Picomolar Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RBD via Computationally-Optimized Peptide BeaconsPreprint
Tripathy, S. P., Ponnapati, M. R., Jacobson, J. M., & Chatterjee, P. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.06.04.447114 · Cited by 1
Review: Modeling peptide-protein complexes: docking, simulations and machine learning — R0/PR1
Mondal, A., Chang, L., & Pérez, A. (2022) · QRB Discovery · doi:10.1017/qrd.2022.14.pr1 · Cited by 1
Gene Mutagenesis Methods in Directed Evolution and Rational Enzyme Design
Reetz, M. T., Sun, Z., & Qu, G. (2023) · Enzyme Engineering · doi:10.1002/9783527836895.ch3 · Cited by 1
A Generative Model for Creating Path Delineated Helical ProteinsPreprint
Kibler, R. D., Wicky, B. I. M., Coventry, B., & Woodall, N. B. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.05.24.542095 · Cited by 1
AlignAb: Pareto-Optimal Energy Alignment for Designing Nature-Like AntibodiesPreprint
Wen, Y., Xu, C., Hu, J. Y.-C., & Liu, H. (2025) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/ovbkgz · Cited by 1
GeoFlow-V2: A Unified Atomic Diffusion Model for Protein Structure Prediction and De Novo DesignPreprint
BioGeometry Team (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.05.06.652551 · Cited by 1
An improved model for prediction of de novo designed proteins with diverse geometriesPreprint
Orr, B., Crilly, S. E., Akpinaroglu, D., Zhu, E., Keiser, M. J., & Kortemme, T. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.06.02.657515 · Cited by 2
PepCCD: A Contrastive Conditioned Diffusion Framework for Target-Specific Peptide GenerationPreprint
Zhang, J., Zhou, Y., Zhu, T., & Zhu, Z. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.09.01.673427 · Cited by 1
Decoding the physicochemical basis of taxonomy preferences in protein design modelsPreprint
Dillon, L. B., Maiwald, A., & Crook, O. M. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.10.21.683350 · Cited by 1
Co-designing sequence and structure of functional de novo enzymes with EnzyGen2Preprint
Song, Z., Liu, H., Zhao, Y., Yang, Y., & Li, L. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.03.02.709205 · Cited by 1
ComplexDesign: sequence-hallucination design of protein binders bridging multiple proteinsPreprint
Xu, J. Q., Ren, M., Qi, N., Zhang, X., He, Z., Yu, C., & Bu, D. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.06.21.733655 · Cited by 1
Computational design of microbial and animal rhodopsin soluble analoguesPreprint
Hilditch, A. T., Goverde, C. A., Gasilova, N., Warrelmann, S. C., Goldbach, N. M., Wachtveitl, J., Menin, L., & Correia, B. E. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.06.27.734960 · Cited by 1
Specificity-driven protein binder design with Odin-MultiPreprint
Brasas, V., Christensen, C. R., Björnsson, K. H., Møller, V. E., Scapolo, B., Benard-Valle, M., Nygaard, M. M., Nielsen, J. C., Hadrup, S. R., Johansen, K. H., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.09.08.749745 · Cited by 2
Reliable and Efficient Agentic Protein Design with Toolset HarnessingPreprint
Butcher, J., Chen, J., Hunt, A., Haas, C. M., Dai, W., Sharma, S., Mitra, R., Salike, S., Koob, J. G., Muraishi, A., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.10.19.759896 · Cited by 2
Self-citationMondal, A., Chang, L., & Pérez, A. (2022) · QRB Discovery · doi:10.1017/qrd.2022.14.pr4
Mondal, A., Chang, L., & Pérez, A. (2022) · QRB Discovery · doi:10.1017/qrd.2022.14.pr5
Review: Modeling peptide-protein complexes: docking, simulations and machine learning — R0/PR2
Mondal, A., Chang, L., & Pérez, A. (2022) · QRB Discovery · doi:10.1017/qrd.2022.14.pr2
Mondal, A., Chang, L., & Pérez, A. (2022) · QRB Discovery · doi:10.1017/qrd.2022.14.pr3
Kim, Y., Cho, J., Jung, H., Meyer, L. E., Fioroni, G. M., Jeong, K., McCormick, R. L., John, P. C. S., & Kim, S. (2023) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-hs9n1
Restraint Validation of Biomolecular Structures Determined By NMR in the Protein Data BankPreprint
Baskaran, K., Płoskoń, E., Tejero, R., Yokochi, M., Harrus, D., Liang, Y., Peisach, E., Persikova, I., Ramelot, T. A., Sekharan, M. R., et al. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4507732
Designing Enzymes for New Chemical Transformations
Kohn, A. R., Trimble, J. S., Crawshaw, R., & Green, A. P. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-32-390644-9.00105-0
Singh, P., Tripathi, S., & Bihari, A. (2023) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-3716-5_19
Hsiao, J., Deng, L. C., Moroz, L. L., Chalasani, S. H., & Edsinger, E. (2024) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-3642-8_19
A Unified Framework of Scaffold-Lab for Critical Assessment of Protein Backbone Generation MethodsPreprint
Chen, H., Zheng, Z., Zhang, B., Zhong, B., Liu, K., Li, Z., Zhu, J., Yu, J.-L., & Wei, T. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4249839/v1
Molecular peptide grafting as a tool for creating new generation of biopeptides: A mini-review
Chernukha, I. M., Тихонов, С. Л., & Тихонова, Н. В. (2024) · Food systems · doi:10.21323/2618-9771-2024-7-2-220-224
Machine learning–driven descriptions of protein dynamics at solid–liquid interfaces
Stegmann, A. E., Legg, B. A., Yoreo, J. J. D., & Zhang, S. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-22001-2.00013-5
An introduction to the application of deep learning in the biomedical field
Ruisong, W. A. N. G., Shengnan, W. A. N. G., & Tieliu, S. H. I. (2024) · Scientia Sinica Vitae · doi:10.1360/ssv-2023-0297
Doffini, V., & Nash, M. A. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.09.25.615059
Li, D., Zhu, Y., Zhang, W., Liu, J., Yang, X., Liu, Z., & Wei, D. (2024) · Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12539-024-00662-7
Algorithms for Structure Comparison and Analysis: Prediction of Structures of Proteins
D’Arminio, N., Giordano, D., Facchiano, A. M., & Marabotti, A. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95502-7.00114-7
A Concise Overview of Bioinformatics
da Silva, A. L., Mariano, D., Parise, M. T. D., Puelles, A. L. A., Bialves, T. S., Bastos, L. L., dos Santos, L. M., & Lemos, R. P. (2024) · Advances in bioinformatics and biomedical engineering book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-3192-7.ch001
Drug Discovery and Development Explained: Introductory Notes for the General Public
(2024) · Frontiers research topics · doi:10.3389/978-2-8325-5774-7
Química, A. D. (2024) · Anales de química · doi:10.62534/rseq.aq.2013
DeepUSPS : Deep Learning‐Empowered Unconstrained‐Structural Protein Sequence Design
Ma, Z., & Yang, J. (2025) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26847
Behavioral Structure Computing
Wang, C. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-5194-8_5
When researchers don’t have the proteins they need, they can get AI to ‘hallucinate’ new structures
Anishchenko, I. V. (2022) · The Conversation · doi:10.64628/aai.e4kkyr6fs
Self-citationProtein design drives synthetic biology research of plant natural products
Zhang, X., Yao, Y., Wang, Y., Ma, Y., & Shang, Y. (2025) · BioDesign Research · doi:10.1016/j.bidere.2025.100048
Rapid discovery of new-to-nature protein domains by novelty-first forcing of language modelsPreprint
Subramanian, A. M., & Thomson, M. W. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.10.02.679910
Fang, C., Wang, Y., Mo, F., & Wen, Z. (2025) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-025-00696-z
Peña¹, A. R. M. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8076381/v1
Advances in Other Science and Technology Relevant to Hostile Misuse of CNS-acting Chemicals
(2025) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781837678174-00158
Artificial intelligence in protein science and engineering
Ashrafuzzaman, M. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95464-8.00001-3
Additional file 1 of Freeprotmap: waiting-free prediction method for protein distance map
Huang, J., Li, J., Chen, Q., Wang, X., Chen, G., & Tang, J. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25751413
Min, X., Yang, C., Xie, J., Huang, Y., Liu, N., Jin, X., Wang, T., Kong, Z., Lu, X., Ge, S., et al. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26671197
Protein design and RNA design: Perspectives
Chen, X., Dai, X., & Lu, P. (2025) · Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1002/qub2.70029
Sharma, M., Ganie, K. A., Panwar, P., & Arti (2025) · International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science · doi:10.51583/ijltemas.2025.1412000008
(2026) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781837679690-00581
Boer, B. D., Lamme, T. D., Verdwaald, K., Medina, S. S., Nemeth, C. G., Elfrink, E. M., Smit, M. J., de Esch, I. J. P., & Schafer, C. T. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.01.23.701245
Rousset, Y., Kroll, A., & Lercher, M. J. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.01.23.701068
LLM Hallucinations for RAG and KG Enhancement
Anirudh, R., Soudagar, A. F., & L, C. M. (2025) · International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN) · doi:10.1109/cicn67655.2025.11368193
Micron-Scale 2D Antibody Arrays for HER2 Signaling Blockade and Cancer Therapy
Du, M., Zhong, X., Yao, T., Wu, X., Chen, Q., Ling, S., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Chen, G., Jiang, J., et al. (2026) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5c22627
Structural prediction of protein assemblies with deep learning
Bret, H. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/b3849091zce01z4ab0z91efz2b71d9cc754d
A deep learning predictor of bindable protein surfaces to guide generative synthetic biologyPreprint
Almeida-Souza, L. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.04.16.718848
Protein Design Enters the Artificial Intelligence Era: Foundations, Tools, and Emerging Paradigms
Mi, Y., Shukla, A., Tangney, M., Tabirca, S., & Yallapragada, V. V. B. (2026) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.34133/csbj.0105
Machine learning approaches in protein-protein and protein-drug binding
Schlichthaerle, T. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-99507-8.00061-5
Generative Protein Design: From Deep Learning Algorithms to Translational Applications
Luo, S., & Zhou, B. (2026) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms27093917 · Cited by 1
Can AI simplify the alphabet of life?
Sanfiorenzo, C., & Wang, K. (2026) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aeh0122
Backbone Structure-Conditioned Sequence Design Using Machine Learning-Based Approaches
Gushchin, I., Nikolaev, A. S., Kuznetsova, E. A., Bugrova, A. D., Afanasev, A. A., & Remeeva, A. (2026) · Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1134/s1068162026601497
Boer, B. D., Lamme, T. D., Verdwaald, K., Medina, S. S., Nemeth, C. G., Elfrink, E. M., Smit, M. J., de Esch, I. J. P., & Schafer, C. T. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.111190.1
Boer, B. D., Lamme, T. D., Verdwaald, K., Medina, S. S., Nemeth, C. G., Elfrink, E. M., Smit, M. J., de Esch, I. J. P., & Schafer, C. T. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.111190
Kell, D. B., & Roberts, I. (2026) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d5cs01387a
Machine-guided design for bioengineering gene therapy vectors: Where are we and what lies ahead?
Rodrigues, A. F., Ferraz, L., & Pesquita, C. (2026) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2026.108925
De novo designed cyclic MC4R peptide agonist reduces food intake in micePreprint
Møller, V. E., Johansen, J. M., Mikkelsen, R. B., Tran, P., Kayed, A., Buch‐Månson, N., Jenkins, T. P., Dalbøge, L. S., Nielsen, J. C., & Nygaard, M. M. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.19.721857
Barley HvBODYGUARD1 controls cuticular specialisations regulated by SHINE transcription factors
McAllister, T., Campoli, C., Liu, L., Chia, T., Fisher, S. R., Horsnell, R. A., Prescott, A. R., Shoesmith, J., Eskan, M., Iredale, A., et al. (2026) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.71287
From prediction to discovery: AI as an observatory of physical organization in protein space
Zheng, Y., Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., Kang, W., Ren, W., & Tang, Q.-Y. (2026) · AI for Science · doi:10.1088/3050-287x/ae78ea
Lozano-García, M., Codina, J.-R., Mascini, M., Dikici, E., Deo, S. K., Nichols, J. E., Azar, S. R., & Daunert, S. (2026) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2026.06.020
EditorForge: An Active-Site-Aware Framework for Inverse-Folding-Based Protein RedesignPreprint
Chen, A., Siddiqui, J., Taucar, W., Tiralongo, L., Tkachenko, M., Xu, A., Bawa, S., Guo, S., Pinska, O., Rim, J., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.06.08.730993
De novo design of microprotein in neurodegenerative diseases
Das, A. K., & Borah, M. (2026) · Discover Molecules · doi:10.1007/s44345-026-00058-8
SteerAF: Distogram-based Steering of AlphaFold2 toward Alternative ConformationsPreprint
Tang, J., Zhu, Z., Yang, S., & Song, C. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.06.19.733296 · Cited by 1
Coluzza, I. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-99507-8.00090-1
Bridging Algorithms and Biocatalysis: Perspectives on AI-Supported Enzyme Engineering
Teijeiro-Juiz, R., Brück, T., & Loll, B. (2026) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules31132359
Automating De Novo Protein Design via LLM-Based Multi-agent Systems
Abdelaziz, K., Pester, A., Andres, F., & Mostafa, N. A. (2026) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-20235-2_2
Biotechnology and protein engineering in cosmetics industry
Breslauer, D. N. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-41499-2.00015-x
Protein Design and Synthetic Biology
Wipat, A., & Hallinan, J. S. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-11023-7_5
De Novo Design of Protein Nanopores: From Minimal Peptides to AI-Driven Design
Vorobieva, A. A., Samanta, R., & Thillo, T. V. (2026) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00990
Yoon, H., Han, R., Kim, J.-W., & Lee, Y. (2026) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbag421
Single cell mapping of B and T cell dynamics in breast cancer lymph node metastasis
Khan, S., Jamil, S., Hamza, M., Attique, Z., & Zhang, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Bioinformatics · doi:10.3389/fbinf.2026.1833416
Discovery and design of potent cell surface display elements
Fang, Z., Saskin, J., Lee, S.-H., Zou, C., Xin, S., Huang, X., Pan, X., Dong, C., Abiri, A., Feng, Y., et al. (2026) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-026-03144-x
Scaffold-Constrained Generative Design Overcomes Failure Modes in Computational Protein EngineeringPreprint
Pourbaghi, M., Elemento, O., & Bradbury, M. S. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.08.07.743551
Khan, T., & Osondu, I. S. (2026) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--59130
Extremophilic microbial chassis for biomanufacturing applications
Luo, Y., Song, Y., Xu, H., & Cao, Y. (2026) · Scientia Sinica Vitae · doi:10.1360/ssv-2026-0246
MixInfoFold: A Method For Iteratively Generating Better Sequences
Zeng, A., Chen, C., Li, J., Yang, B., & Pan, D. (2026) · Tsinghua Science & Technology · doi:10.26599/tst.2026.9010082
Li, Z., Tian, F., Jiang, S., Dong, S., & Tian, F. (2026) · Molecular Diversity · doi:10.1007/s11030-026-11714-z
Scalable Production of a De Novo SARS-CoV-2 Antiviral Miniprotein in Escherichia coli
Shin, J., Kim, E.-M., Jang, J.-H., Jee, S.-W., Kim, S.-H., Yu, S. G., Yoon, M., Craig, D., Swoyer, R., Patel, S., et al. (2026) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics18091110
CatESO: Differentiable Enzyme Sequence Optimization Guided by Substrate-Aware K cat Prediction
Gan, Z., Xu, Y., Xu, J., Wu, Z., Huang, J., Yin, J., Chen, G., & Zhang, J. Z. H. (2026) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6c14365
BAGEL-CAR: Reflections on the Bits to Binders CompetitionPreprint
Lála, J., & Angioletti‐Uberti, S. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.09.02.748856
Advances in de novo protein design for anti-infective applications
Yin, J., 顾子春, Sun, Y., & Tao, L. (2026) · Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version) · doi:10.1360/csb-2026-0714
Computational Peptide Design Methods for Drug Discovery Targeting Protein-Protein Interactions
Kosugi, T. (2024) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)
Antibody Hotspot-Centric de Novo Design of Peptide Inhibitors of Influenza A Virus Membrane Fusion
Kadam, R. U., Juraszek, J., Branduardi, D., Ameijde, J., Garg, D., Vermond, J., Jongeneelen, M. A. C., Tang, C., Vogels, R., van Dongen, M. J. P., et al. (2026) · ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acsmedchemlett.6c00321
Algorithms, Learning, and Randomness
Srivastava, P. (2026) · Springer proceedings in physics · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-2948-2_29
Metadata
- Authors
- Anishchenko, I., Chidyausiku, T. M., Ovchinnikov, S., Pellock, S. J., & Baker, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Baker, David
- Venue
- Nature
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2020-07-23
- Volume
- 600
- Issue
- 7889
- Pages
- 547-552
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9293396
- OpenAlex
- W3216341763
- Cited by
- 629
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 102 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 139 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 31.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF18OC0030446)
- National Institutes of Health (1s10od021527-01, DP5OD026389)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM120574, R35GM141818, P30GM124165)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- de novo protein design, deep neural network, hallucinations, protein structure prediction, Kullback-Leibler divergence, synthetic proteins, protein folding, circular dichroism, X-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Hallucinations, Humans, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Neural Networks, Computer, Crystallography, X-Ray
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
