PreprintCited by 7Genomics and Rare DiseasesCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsBRCA gene mutations in cancer

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An active learning framework improves tumor variant interpretation

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-3798 · Paper page

Abstract

For precision medicine to reach its full potential for treatment of cancer and other diseases, protein variant effect prediction tools are needed that characterize variants of unknown significance (VUS) in a patient’s genome with respect to their likelihood to influence treatment response and outcomes. However, the performance of most variant prediction tools is limited by the difficulty of acquiring sufficient training and validation data. To overcome these limitations, we applied an iterative active learning approach starting from available biochemical, evolutionary, and functional annotations. The potential of active learning to improve variant interpretation was first demonstrated by applying it to synthetic and deep mutational scanning (DMS) datasets for four cancer-relevant proteins. We then probed its utility to guide interpretation and functional validation of tumor VUS in a potential biomarker for cancer therapy sensitivity, the nucleotide excision repair (NER) protein Xeroderma Pigmentosum Complementation Group A (XPA). A quantitative high-throughput cell-based NER activity assay, fluorescence-based multiplex flow-cytometric host cell reactivation (FM-HCR), was used to validate XPA VUS selected by the active learning strategy. In all cases, selecting VUS for validation by active learning yielded an improvement in performance over traditional learning. These analyses suggest that active learning is well-suited to significantly improve interpretation of VUS and cancer patient genomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.11.08.467747

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 2021, Opportunities and challenges for the computational interpretation of rare variation in clinically important genes, Am J Hum Genet, 108, 535, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2015, An overview of the NCI precision medicine trials-NCI MATCH and MPACT, Chin Clin Oncol, 4, 31
  3. 10.1038/s41586-020-2817-4 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s41576-019-0127-1 · DOI
  5. 10.1159/000368034 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1186/s13073-019-0690-2 · DOI
  7. 2003, Enhanced cisplatin cytotoxicity by disturbing the nucleotide excision repair pathway in ovarian cancer cell lines, Cancer research, 63, 1311
  8. 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.01.005 · DOI
  9. 10.1101/cshperspect.a012609 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.03.010 · DOI
  11. 2019, ERCC2 Helicase Domain Mutations Confer Nucleotide Excision Repair Deficiency and Drive Cisplatin Sensitivity in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 25, 977, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1001 · DOI
  12. 2016, Clinical Validation of Chemotherapy Response Biomarker ERCC2 in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma, JAMA Oncol, 2, 1094, 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1056 · DOI
  13. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0623 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.076 · DOI
  15. 10.1021/ja503020f · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.05.018 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1074/jbc.M117.800078 · DOI
  18. 2008, Clinical features of xeroderma pigmentosum, Adv Exp Med Biol, 637, 10
  19. 2018, Xeroderma Pigmentosum -Facts and Perspectives, Anticancer Res, 38, 1159
  20. 10.1007/s00439-019-01970-5 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 1996, Active learning with statistical models, J Artif Intell Res, 4, 129, 10.1613/jair.295 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41588-018-0122-z · DOI · Paper page
  23. 2021, Massively parallel characterization of CYP2C9 variant enzyme activity and abundance, Am J Hum Genet, 108, 1735, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.07.001 · DOI
  24. 10.1073/pnas.1915680117 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 2020, dbNSFP v4: a comprehensive database of transcript-specific functional predictions and annotations for human nonsynonymous and splice-site SNVs, Genome Med, 12, 103, 10.1186/s13073-020-00803-9 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.04.018 · DOI
  27. 2004, Learning with local and global consistency, Adv Neur In, 16, 321
  28. 10.1038/s41467-019-10745-5 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1093/nar/gkz1231 · DOI
  30. 2020, New structural insights into the recognition of undamaged splayed-arm DNA with a single pair of non-complementary nucleotides by human nucleotide excision repair protein XPA, Int J Biol Macromol, 148, 466, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.169 · DOI
  31. Lian FM , Yang X , Yang W , Jiang YL , Qian C. Structural characterization of the redefined DNA-binding domain of human XPA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2019 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.030 · DOI
  33. 10.1073/pnas.1401182111 · DOI
  34. 2021, Large-scale preparation of fluorescence multiplex host cell reactivation (FM-HCR) reporters, Nat Protoc, 16, 4265, 10.1038/s41596-021-00577-3 · DOI
  35. Settles B. Active learning. Synthesis lectures on artificial intelligence and machine learning,. San Rafael, Calif.: Morgan & Claypool,; 2012. p 1 online resource (xiii, 100 pages). · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601894 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00136-7 · DOI
  38. 10.1074/jbc.270.9.4896 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/nar/gkn964 · DOI
  40. 2019, A review of various semi-supervised learning models with a deep learning and memory approach, Iran Journal of Computer Science, 2, 65, 10.1007/s42044-018-00027-6 · DOI
  41. 2020, A survey on semi-supervised learning, Mach Learn, 109, 373, 10.1007/s10994-019-05855-6 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1007/BF02265282 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/nsmb1061 · DOI
  44. 1992, Mutational analysis of the structure and function of the xeroderma pigmentosum group A complementing protein. Identification of essential domains for nuclear localization and DNA excision repair, The Journal of biological chemistry, 267, 12182, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)49821-9 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 1991, Analysis of point mutations in an ultraviolet-irradiated shuttle vector plasmid propagated in cells from Japanese xeroderma pigmentosum patients in complementation groups A and F, Cancer research, 51, 3177
  46. 2021, From variant to function in human disease genetics, Science, 373, 1464, 10.1126/science.abi8207 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Blee, A. M., Li, B., Pecen, T., Meiler, J., Nagel, Z. D., Capra, J. A., & Chazin, W. J.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
  • Capra, John A.
  • Chazin, Walter J.
Venue
Cancer Research
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-11-09
Volume
82
Issue
15
Pages
2704-2715
ISSN
0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4282925187
Cited by
7
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association (20POST35220002)
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • Vanderbilt University
  • National Institutes of Health (CA092584)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL007118)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U01HG007674, U01HG010215)
  • National Cancer Institute (F32CA250258, T32CA009582, R01CA218315, P01CA092584)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM013434)
  • National Center for Research Resources (S10RR031634)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Keywords
active learning (machine learning), variants of uncertain significance, precision medicine, XPA, nucleotide excision repair, deep mutational scanning, functional validation, limited training data
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review