PreprintCited by 11Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Higher visual areas act like domain-general filters with strong selectivity and functional specialization

Open access
Khosla, Meenakshi, Wehbe, Leila·2022·Nature Communications

Abstract

Neuroscientific studies rely heavily on a-priori hypotheses, which can bias results toward existing theories. Here, we use a hypothesis-neutral approach to study category selectivity in higher visual cortex. Using only stimulus images and their associated fMRI activity, we constrain randomly initialized neural networks to predict voxel activity. Despite no category-level supervision, the units in the trained networks act as detectors for semantic concepts like ‘faces’ or ‘words’, providing solid empirical support for categorical selectivity. Importantly, this selectivity is maintained when training the networks without images that contain the preferred category, strongly suggesting that selectivity is not domain-specific machinery, but sensitivity to generic patterns that characterize preferred categories. The ability of the models’ representations to transfer to perceptual tasks further reveals the functional role of their selective responses. Finally, our models show selectivity only for a limited number of categories, all previously identified, suggesting that the essential categories are already known. Teaser: Models trained solely to predict fMRI activity from images reveal strong category selectivity in higher visual areas, even without exposure to these categories in training.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.03.16.484578

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The organization of the cerebral cortex is characterized by extraordinary specialization of neural units at all levels.

    “Notably, the organization of the cerebral cortex, widely considered as the likely substrate of human consciousness, is characterized by extraordinary specialization of neural units at all levels [38–40].”

    From Integrated information theory (IIT) 4.0: Formulating the properties of phenomenal existence in physical terms (2023) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Introduction (p. 2) identifies category-selective regions in visual cortex, supporting specialization in some cortical areas. It does not establish extraordinary specialization of neural units throughout the cerebral cortex or at all levels; the Discussion (p. 21) notes that single neurons or voxels in some underexplored visual regions do not appear highly category-selective. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 86

  1. 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.8418487 · DOI
  3. 10.1073/pnas.1423496112 · DOI
  4. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-11-04302.1997 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1126/science.1119983 · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.0502605102 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/33402 · DOI
  8. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2792-11.2011 · DOI
  9. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5865-10.2011 · DOI
  10. 10.1126/science.1063414 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1152/jn.00513.2004 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.262 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/13217 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/brain/123.2.291 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.022 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nrn3747 · DOI
  17. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.113024 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.073 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.014 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.11.004 · DOI
  21. 10.1073/pnas.1403112111 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Martin Schrimpf , Jonas Kubilius , Ha Hong , Najib J Majaj , Rishi Rajalingham , Elias B Issa , Kohitij Kar , Pouya Bashivan , Jonathan Prescott-Roy , Franziska Geiger , et al. Brain-score: Which artificial neural network for object recognition is most brain-like? BioRxiv, page 407007, 2020.
  23. 10.1016/J.NEURON.2020.07.040 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 2021, Computational models of category-selective brain regions enable highthroughput tests of selectivity, Nature communications, 12, 1
  25. 10.1162/jocn\_a\_01755 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1093/cercor/bhx268 · DOI
  28. 10.1126/sciadv.abe7547 · DOI
  29. Aria Wang , Michael Tarr , and Leila Wehbe . Neural taskonomy: Inferring the similarity of task-derived representations from brain activity. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019. · DOI
  30. 2016, A deep convolutional energy model of v4 responses to natural movies, Journal of Vision, 16, 876, 10.1167/16.12.876 · DOI
  31. 2021, End-to-end neural system identification with neural information flow, PLOS Computational Biology, 17, e1008558, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008558 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/s41593-021-00962-x · DOI
  33. Ghislain St-Yves , Emily J. Allen, Yihan Wu, Kendrick Kay, and Thomas Naselaris. Brain-optimized neural networks learn non-hierarchical models of representation in human visual cortex. bioRxiv, 2022. · DOI
  34. David Bau , Bolei Zhou , Aditya Khosla , Aude Oliva , and Antonio Torralba . Network dissection: Quantifying interpretability of deep visual representations. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 6541–6549, 2017. · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1073/pnas.1907375117 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Meenakshi Khosla , N Apurva Ratan Murty , and Nancy Kanwisher . A highly selective response to food in human visual cortex revealed by hypothesis-free voxel decomposition. Current Biology, 2022. · DOI
  37. Nidhi Jain , Aria Wang , Margaret M Henderson , Ruogu Lin , Jacob S Prince , Michael J Tarr , and Leila Wehbe . Food for thought: selectivity for food in human ventral visual cortex. bioRxiv, 2022. · DOI
  38. Ian Morgan Leo Pennock , Chris Racey , Emily Jean Allen , Yihan Wu , Thomas Naselaris , Kendrick Kay , Anna Franklin , and Jenny Bosten . Color-biased regions in the ventral visual pathway are food-selective. bioRxiv, 2022. · DOI
  39. 10.1002/cne.901770302 · DOI
  40. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-08-02620.1989 · DOI
  41. 10.1073/pnas.1412616111 · DOI
  42. Alexander S Ecker , Fabian H Sinz , Emmanouil Froudarakis , Paul G Fahey , Santiago A Cadena , Edgar Y Walker , Erick Cobos , Jacob Reimer , Andreas S Tolias , and Matthias Bethge . A rotation-equivariant convolutional neural network model of primary visual cortex. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.10504, 2018. · arXiv
  43. David A Klindt , Alexander S Ecker , Thomas Euler , and Matthias Bethge . Neural system identification for large populations separating what and where. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 3509–3519, 2017.
  44. 10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.003 · DOI
  45. 10.1073/pnas.1618228114 · DOI
  46. 2018, Retrosplenial cortex and its role in spatial cognition, Brain and neuroscience advances, 2, 2398212818757098
  47. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4802-13.2014 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.002 · DOI
  49. Mariya Toneva , Tom M Mitchell , and Leila Wehbe . Combining computational controls with natural text reveals new aspects of meaning composition. bioRxiv, 2020. · DOI
  50. Mariya Toneva , Jennifer Williams , Anand Bollu , Christoph Dann , and Leila Wehbe . Same cause; different effects in the brain. Proceeedings of the conference on Causal Learning and Reasoning, 2022.
  51. 10.1126/science.aad8127 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00800-9 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/nn1224 · DOI
  54. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2609-12.2012 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 2011, The role of occipitotemporal body-selective regions in person perception, Cognitive neuroscience, 2, 186, 10.1080/17588928.2011.582945 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00134-7 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 2019, Pygop: A python library for generalized operational perceptron algorithms, Knowledge-Based Systems, 182, 104801, 10.1016/j.knosys.2019.06.009 · DOI
  58. 2018, Large-scale celebfaces attributes (celeba) dataset, Retrieved August, 15, 11
  59. Omkar M Parkhi , Andrea Vedaldi , and Andrew Zisserman . Deep face recognition. 2015. · DOI · Paper page
  60. 2016, What makes imagenet good for transfer learning?, arXiv preprint
  61. Yinda Zhang , Fisher Yu , Shuran Song , Pingmei Xu , Ari Seff , and Jianxiong Xiao . Largescale scene understanding challenge: Room layout estimation. In CVPR Workshop, 2015.
  62. Jianxiong Xiao , James Hays , Krista A Ehinger , Aude Oliva , and Antonio Torralba . Sun database: Large-scale scene recognition from abbey to zoo. In 2010 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3485–3492. IEEE, 2010. · DOI · Paper page
  63. 2017, Letter perception emerges from unsupervised deep learning and recycling of natural image features, Nature human behaviour, 1, 657, 10.1038/s41562-017-0186-2 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.014 · DOI
  65. 2019, Convergent evolution of face spaces across human face-selective neuronal groups and deep convolutional networks, Nature communications, 10, 1
  66. 10.1162/jocna01544 · DOI
  67. 2022, Neurogen: activation optimized image synthesis for discovery neuroscience, NeuroImage, 247, 118812, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118812 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.005 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1038/s41593-019-0517-x · DOI
  70. 10.1126/science.aav9436 · DOI
  71. 10.1073/pnas.0706079105 · DOI
  72. Ruth Fong and Andrea Vedaldi . Net2vec: Quantifying and explaining how concepts are encoded by filters in deep neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8730–8738, 2018. · DOI
  73. Tsung-Yi Lin , Michael Maire , Serge Belongie , James Hays , Pietro Perona , Deva Ramanan , Piotr Dollar , and C Lawrence Zitnick . Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In European conference on computer vision, pages 740–755. Springer, 2014. · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1093/cercor/bhw068 · DOI
  75. Maurice Weiler , Fred A Hamprecht , and Martin Storath . Learning steerable filters for rotation equivariant cnns. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 849–858, 2018. · DOI
  76. Maurice Weiler and Gabriele Cesa . General e (2)-equivariant steerable cnns. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019.
  77. Alex Krizhevsky , Ilya Sutskever , and Geoffrey E Hinton . Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 25, 2012.
  78. Jia Deng , Wei Dong , Richard Socher , Li-Jia Li , Kai Li , and Li Fei-Fei . Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 248–255. Ieee, 2009. · DOI · Paper page
  79. Kamila Jozwik , Nikolaus Kriegeskorte , Radoslaw Martin Cichy , and Marieke Mur . Deep convolutional neural networks, features, and categories perform similarly at explaining primate high-level visual representations. 2019. · DOI
  80. Tete Xiao , Yingcheng Liu , Bolei Zhou , Yuning Jiang , and Jian Sun . Unified perceptual parsing for scene understanding. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pages 418–434, 2018. · DOI · Paper page
  81. Bolei Zhou , Hang Zhao , Xavier Puig , Sanja Fidler , Adela Barriuso , and Antonio Torralba . Scene parsing through ade20k dataset. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 633–641, 2017. · DOI · Paper page
  82. 2009, Visualizing higher-layer features of a deep network, University of Montreal, 1341, 1
  83. 2015, Understanding neural networks through deep visualization, arXiv preprint
  84. Aravindh Mahendran and Andrea Vedaldi . Understanding deep image representations by inverting them. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5188–5196, 2015. · DOI · Paper page
  85. Chris Olah , Alexander Mordvintsev , and Ludwig Schubert . Feature visualization. Distill, 2017. https://distill.pub/2017/feature-visualization. · DOI · Paper page
  86. Qiong Cao , Li Shen , Weidi Xie , Omkar M Parkhi , and Andrew Zisserman . Vggface2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and age. In 2018 13th IEEE international conference on automatic face & gesture recognition (FG 2018), pages 67–74. IEEE, 2018. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Khosla, M., & Wehbe, L.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Wehbe, Leila
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-03-18
Volume
17
Issue
1
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220765743
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Carnegie Mellon University
  • University of California, San Diego
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
category selectivity, functional specialization, semantic concept detection
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Neurological, Photic Stimulation, Visual Cortex, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review