PreprintCited by 53Genomics and Rare DiseasesGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genome-wide prediction of pathogenic gain- and loss-of-function variants from ensemble learning of a diverse feature set

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1186/s13073-023-01261-9 · Paper page

Abstract

Gain-of-function (GOF) variants give rise to increased or novel protein functions whereas loss-of-function (LOF) variants lead to diminished protein function. GOF and LOF variants can result in markedly varying phenotypes, even when occurring in the same gene. However, experimental approaches for identifying GOF and LOF are generally slow and costly, whilst currently available computational methods have not been optimized to discriminate between GOF and LOF variants. We have developed LoGoFunc, an ensemble machine learning method for predicting pathogenic GOF, pathogenic LOF, and neutral genetic variants. LoGoFunc was trained on a broad range of gene-, protein-, and variant-level features describing diverse biological characteristics, as well as network features summarizing the protein-protein interactome and structural features calculated from AlphaFold2 protein models. We analyzed GOF, LOF, and neutral variants in terms of local protein structure and function, splicing disruption, and phenotypic associations, thereby revealing previously unreported relationships between various biological phenomena and variant functional outcomes. For example, GOF and LOF variants exhibit contrasting enrichments in protein structural and functional regions, whilst LOF variants are more likely to disrupt canonical splicing as indicated by splicing-related features employed by the model. Further, by performing phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS), we identified strong associations between relevant phenotypes and high-confidence predicted GOF and LOF variants. LoGoFunc outperforms other tools trained solely to predict pathogenicity or general variant impact for the identification of pathogenic GOF and LOF variants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.06.08.495288

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. 10.1042/BJ20121221 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.coi.2012.04.011 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.02.006 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/ng.2892 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/nmeth0410-248 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1093/nar/gkg509 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.016 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1002/humu.23158 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Ke, G. et al. LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 3149–3157 (Curran Associates Inc., 2017).
  10. 2021, Identification of discriminative gene-level and protein-level features associated with pathogenic gain-of-function and loss-of-function variants, Am. J. Hum. Genet, 108, 2301, 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.10.007 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s00439-020-02199-3 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1093/nar/gky1131 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 2019, DDGun: an untrained method for the prediction of protein stability changes upon single and multiple point variations, BMC Bioinformatics, 20, 335, 10.1186/s12859-019-2923-1 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1093/NAR/GKAA913 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1093/nar/gkaa977 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1126/science.185.4154.862 · DOI
  20. 2019, MMSplice: modular modeling improves the predictions of genetic variant effects on splicing, Genome Biol, 20, 48, 10.1186/s13059-019-1653-z · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/J.CELL.2018.12.015 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1093/nar/gkr203 · DOI
  23. 2015, DANN: a deep learning approach for annotating the pathogenicity of genetic variants, Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl, 31, 761, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu703 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.08.005 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/srep10576 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/humu.22932 · DOI
  27. 2018, Predicting the clinical impact of human mutation with deep neural networks, Nat. Genet, 50, 1161, 10.1038/s41588-018-0167-z · DOI
  28. Lundberg, S. M. & Lee, S.-I. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol. 30 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2017).
  29. 10.1186/gb-2005-6-5-r44 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1186/1471-2164-14-3 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/ng.3703 · DOI
  32. 2021, MVP predicts the pathogenicity of missense variants by deep learning, Nat. Commun, 12, 510, 10.1038/s41467-020-20847-0 · DOI
  33. Petrazzini, B. O. et al. Prediction of recessive inheritance for missense variants in human disease. 2021.10.25.21265472 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.25.21265472 (2021). · DOI
  34. 10.1101/gr.3577405 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1101/gr.3715005 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1038/ng.3050 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1038/nmeth.3739 · DOI
  38. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002886 · DOI
  39. Grover, A. & Leskovec, J. node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networks. ArXiv160700653 Cs Stat (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  40. 2020, The phenotypic spectrum of SCN2A-related epilepsy, Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. EJPN Off. J. Eur. Paediatr. Neurol. Soc, 24, 117
  41. 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.05.037 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1126/science.aaw2999 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty960 · DOI
  44. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001025 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1093/nar/gkx1153 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1038/s41467-021-21178-4 · DOI
  47. 2020, Gain-of-function mutations in PIEZO1 directly impair hepatic iron metabolism via the inhibition of the BMP/SMADs pathway, Am. J. Hematol, 95, 188, 10.1002/ajh.25683 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.4103/0366-6999.202737 · DOI
  49. 2019, NetSurfP-2.0: Improved prediction of protein structural features by integrated deep learning, Proteins, 87, 520, 10.1002/prot.25674 · DOI
  50. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005242 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/s41467-020-19669-x · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1073/pnas.1518646112 · DOI
  54. 2008, Rare Dis, Orphanet J, 3, 22
  55. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.03.004 · DOI
  56. 2020, dbNSFP v4: a comprehensive database of transcript-specific functional predictions and annotations for human nonsynonymous and splice-site SNVs, Genome Med, 12, 103, 10.1186/s13073-020-00803-9 · DOI
  57. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp190 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10915 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1093/nar/gku1206 · DOI
  60. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Predicting Protein Ligand Binding Sites by Combining Evolutionary Sequence Conservation and 3D Structure | PLOS Computational Biology. https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000585. · DOI
  64. 2021, GraphBind: protein structural context embedded rules learned by hierarchical graph neural networks for recognizing nucleic-acid-binding residues, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, e51, 10.1093/nar/gkab044 · DOI
  65. 10.1093/nar/gkaa931 · DOI
  66. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x) · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1145/2939672.2939785 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Akiba, T. , Sano, S. , Yanase, T. , Ohta, T. & Koyama, M. Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework. ArXiv190710902 Cs Stat (2019). · DOI
  70. 10.2307/2280095 · DOI
  71. 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1086/519795 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 2014, R PheWAS: data analysis and plotting tools for phenome-wide association studies in the R environment, Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl, 30, 2375, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu197 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Stein, D., Sevim Bayrak, Ç., Wu, Y., Kars, M. E., Stenson, P. D., Cooper, D. N., Schlessinger, A., & Itan, Y.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Schlessinger, Avner
  • Itan, Yuval
Venue
Genome Medicine
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-06-10
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
103-103
ISSN
1756-994X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389199215
Cited by
53
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
8.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Genome Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (2209-05535)
  • Fondation Leducq (21CVD01)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA271318, R01CA277794)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM108911)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
gain-of-function mutations, loss-of-function mutations, pathogenic variant prediction, ensemble learning, protein function, variant pathogenicity
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Humans, Proteins, Genome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review