PreprintCited by 35Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

One model fits all: combining inference and simulation of gene regulatory networks

Open access
Ventre, Elias, Herbach, Ulysse, Espinasse, Thibault, Benoit, Gérard, Gandrillon, Olivier·2022·PLoS Computational Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010962

Abstract

The rise of single-cell data highlights the need for a nondeterministic view of gene expression, while offering new opportunities regarding gene regulatory network inference. We recently introduced two strategies that specifically exploit time-course data, where single-cell profiling is performed after a stimulus: HARISSA, a mechanistic network model with a highly efficient simulation procedure, and CARDAMOM, a scalable inference method seen as model calibration. Here, we combine the two approaches and show that the same model driven by transcriptional bursting can be used simultaneously as an inference tool, to reconstruct biologically relevant networks, and as a simulation tool, to generate realistic transcriptional profiles emerging from gene interactions. We verify that CARDAMOM quantitatively reconstructs causal links when the data is simulated from HARISSA, and demonstrate its performance on experimental data collected on in vitro differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells. Overall, this integrated strategy largely overcomes the limitations of disconnected inference and simulation. Author summary: Gene regulatory network (GRN) inference is an old problem, to which single-cell data has recently offered new challenges and breakthrough potential. Many GRN inference methods based on single-cell transcriptomic data have been developed over the last few years, while GRN simulation tools have also been proposed for generating synthetic datasets with realistic features. However, except for benchmarking purposes, these two fields remain largely disconnected. In this work, building on a combination of two methods we recently described, we show that a particular GRN model can be used simultaneously as an inference tool, to reconstruct a biologically relevant network from time-course single-cell gene expression data, and as a simulation tool, to generate realistic transcriptional profiles in a non-trivial way through gene interactions. This integrated strategy demonstrates the benefits of using the same executable model for both simulation and inference.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.06.19.496754

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 2019, The rise of the distributions: why non-normality is important for understanding the transcriptome and beyond, Biophysical Reviews, 11, 89, 10.1007/s12551-018-0494-4 · DOI
  2. 2016, Cellular identity at the single-cell level, Mol Biosyst, 12, 2965, 10.1039/C6MB00388E · DOI
  3. 2019, Gene regulatory network inference: An introductory survey, Methods Mol Biol, 1883, 1, 10.1007/978-1-4939-8882-2_1 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/msb.2010.96 · DOI
  5. 2014, Stochastic promoter activation affects nanog expression variability in mouse embryonic stem cells, Scientific reports, 4, 1
  6. 2017, Inferring gene regulatory networks from single-cell data: a mechanistic approach, BMC Systems Biology, 11, 1
  7. 2021, Gene regulatory network inference in single-cell biology, Current Opinion in Systems Biology, 26, 87, 10.1016/j.coisb.2021.04.007 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.0803850105 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.168302 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.02.030 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.029 · DOI
  12. 2021, Reconstructing developmental landscapes and trajectories from single-cell data, Current Opinion in Systems Biology, 27, 100351, 10.1016/j.coisb.2021.06.002 · DOI
  13. 2021, Recent advances in trajectory inference from single-cell omics data, Current Opinion in Systems Biology, 27, 100344, 10.1016/j.coisb.2021.05.005 · DOI
  14. 10.1186/s12859-019-2669-9 · DOI
  15. 2021, Reverse engineering of a mechanistic model of gene expression using metastability and temporal dynamics, In Silico Biology, 14, 89
  16. 2020, SERGIO: A single-cell expression simulator guided by gene regulatory networks, Cell Systems, 11, 252, 10.1016/j.cels.2020.08.003 · DOI
  17. 2020, Benchmarking algorithms for gene regulatory network inference from single-cell transcriptomic data, Nature Methods, 17, 147, 10.1038/s41592-019-0690-6 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0012776 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 2017, Gene Regulatory Network Inference from Single-Cell Data Using Multivariate Information Measures, Cell Systems, 5, 251, 10.1016/j.cels.2017.08.014 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 2017, Sincerities: Inferring gene regulatory networks from time-stamped single cell transcriptional expression profiles, Bioinformatics, 34, 258
  21. 2020, Inferring causal gene regulatory networks from coupled single-cell expression dynamics using scribe, Cell Systems, 10, 1
  22. 10.1038/s41467-016-0009-6 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 2021, Gene regulatory network inference from single-cell data using a self-consistent proteomic field, arXiv, 2109, 1
  24. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002585 · DOI
  25. 2017, Stem cell differentiation as a non-markov stochastic process, Cell Systems, 5, 268, 10.1016/j.cels.2017.08.009 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/s41467-019-09078-0 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1186/s12864-017-4368-0 · DOI
  29. 10.1074/jbc.M112.361790 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1093/nar/gkv370 · DOI
  31. 2022, The importance of considering regulatory domains in genome-wide analyses -the nearest gene is often wrong!, Biol Open, 11, bio059091, 10.1242/bio.059091 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.043 · DOI
  33. 10.1101/gad.1886410 · DOI
  34. 10.1186/gb-2011-12-1-r1 · DOI
  35. 10.1139/O08-141 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx631 · DOI
  37. H. L. Crowell , S. X. M. Leonardo , C. Soneson , and M. D. Robinson , “Built on sand: the shaky foundations of simulating single-cell rna sequencing data,” bioRxiv, pp. 1–18, 2021. · DOI
  38. 10.1038/nrm.2016.139. · DOI
  39. 2020, Umap: uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction, arXiv, 1802, 1
  40. 2021, Spearheading future omics analyses using dyngen, a multi-modal simulator of single cells, Nature Communications, 12, 1
  41. 2015, Evaluating a common semi-mechanistic mathematical model of gene-regulatory networks, BMC Systems Biology, 9, 1
  42. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx194. · DOI · Paper page
  43. 2021, Reduction of a stochastic model of gene expression: Lagrangian dynamics gives access to basins of attraction as cell types and metastabilty, Journal of Mathematical Biology, 83, 1
  44. 10.1038/s41467-019-13889-6 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 2021, Towards a mathematical theory of trajectory inference, arXiv preprint, 1
  46. 10.1126/science.1198817 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1039/C7MB00154A · DOI
  48. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-011520-105250 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 2020, What is a transcriptional burst?, Trends Genet, 36, 288, 10.1016/j.tig.2020.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 2018, Frequency modulation of transcriptional bursting enables sensitive and rapid gene regulation, Cell Syst, 6, 409, 10.1016/j.cels.2018.01.012 · DOI
  51. 10.1137/18M1181006 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Ventre, E., Herbach, U., Espinasse, T., Benoit, G., & Gandrillon, O.
Affiliations
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Gandrillon, Olivier
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-06-20
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
e1010962-e1010962
ISSN
1553-734X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4361017571
Cited by
35
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-18-CE45-0023, ANR18, ANR-11-LABX-0048)
  • Université de Lyon (ANR-11-LABX-0048)
  • Laboratoire d'Excellence Ecofect (ANR-11-LABX-0048)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
gene regulatory network inference, single-cell data, time course data, transcriptional bursting, cardamom, model calibration, mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation, stochastic gene expression
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Computer Simulation, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review