PreprintCited by 0RNA Research and SplicingRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Npl3 functions in mRNP assembly by recruitment of mRNP components to the transcription site and their transfer onto the mRNA

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1093/nar/gkac1206 · Paper page

Abstract

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) control every RNA metabolic process by multiple protein-RNA and protein-protein interactions. Their roles have largely been analyzed by crude mutations, which abrogate multiple functions at once and likely impact the structural integrity of the large messenger ribonucleoprotein particle (mRNP) assemblies, these proteins often function in. Using UV-induced RNA-protein crosslinking and subsequent mass spectrometric analysis, we first identified more than 100 in vivo RNA crosslinks in 16 nuclear mRNP components in S. cerevisiae . For functional analysis, we chose Npl3, for which we determined crosslinks in its two RNA recognition motifs (RRM) and in the flexible linker region connecting the two. Using NMR and structural analyses, we show that both RRM domains and the linker uniquely contribute to RNA recognition. Interestingly, mutations in these regions cause different phenotypes, indicating distinct functions of the different RNA-binding domains of Npl3. Notably, the npl3-Linker mutation strongly impairs recruitment of several mRNP components to chromatin and incorporation of further mRNP components into nuclear mRNPs, establishing a function of Npl3 in nuclear mRNP assembly. Taken together, we determined the specific function of the RNA-binding activity of the nuclear mRNP component Npl3, an approach that can be applied to many RBPs in any RNA metabolic process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.07.22.501171

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.021 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.031 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2013, Global analysis of yeast mRNPs, Nature structural & molecular biology, 20, 127, 10.1038/nsmb.2468 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.029 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nmeth.3092 · DOI
  6. 2019, CAPRI enables comparison of evolutionarily conserved RNA interacting regions, Nat Commun, 10, 2682, 10.1038/s41467-019-10585-3 · DOI
  7. 2016, LFQProfiler and RNP(xl): Open-Source Tools for Label-Free Quantification and Protein-RNA Cross-Linking Integrated into Proteome Discoverer, Journal of proteome research, 15, 3441, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00407 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.004 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/978-3-030-31434-7_3 · DOI
  10. 10.1261/rna.073601.119 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/978-3-030-31434-7_1 · DOI
  12. 2015, Co-transcriptional mRNP formation is coordinated within a molecular mRNP packaging station in S. cerevisiae, Bioessays, 37, 666, 10.1002/bies.201400220 · DOI
  13. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-080111-092106 · DOI
  14. 2020, From parts lists to functional significance-RNA-protein interactions in gene regulation, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA, 11, e1582, 10.1002/wrna.1582 · DOI
  15. Hentze, M.W. , Castello, A. , Schwarzl, T. and Preiss, T. (2018) A brave new world of RNA-binding proteins. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Kelaini, S. , Chan, C. , Cornelius, V.A. and Margariti, A. (2021) RNA-Binding Proteins Hold Key Roles in Function, Dysfunction, and Disease. Biology, 10. · DOI · Paper page
  17. 2021, RNA-binding proteins in human genetic disease, Nature reviews. Genetics, 22, 185, 10.1038/s41576-020-00302-y · DOI
  18. 10.1093/jmcb/mjz043 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.ceb.2018.02.011 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.tibs.2017.02.004 · DOI
  21. 10.1101/gad.339986.120 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/nature746 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/emboj/cdf335 · DOI
  24. 10.1042/BCJ20160010 · DOI
  25. 10.1128/MCB.00402-16 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.03.006 · DOI
  27. 10.1101/gad.1898610 · DOI
  28. 10.1128/MCB.00234-06 · DOI
  29. 10.4161/cc.20716 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/nmeth.2557 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1093/nar/gky640 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14440 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/nbt.1511 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 2002, A direct approach to false discovery rates, Royal Statistical Society, 64, 479, 10.1111/1467-9868.00346 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81319-7 · DOI
  36. 10.1101/gad.266205.115 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/S0079-6565(98)00025-9 · DOI
  38. 10.1021/ja0683436 · DOI
  39. 2013, Using chemical shift perturbation to characterise ligand binding, Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, 73, 1, 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2013.02.001 · DOI
  40. 10.1021/bi00185a040 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/BF00197809 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/s10858-016-0060-y · DOI
  43. 10.1021/bi00449a003 · DOI
  44. 2010, An efficient protocol for NMR-spectroscopy-based structure determination of protein complexes in solution, Angewandte Chemie, 49, 1967, 10.1002/anie.200906147 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/nature10171 · DOI
  46. 10.1007/s10858-013-9741-y · DOI
  47. 10.1002/prot.10299 · DOI
  48. 10.1007/BF00228148 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 2011, NMR and small-angle scattering-based structural analysis of protein complexes in solution, Journal of structural biology, 173, 472, 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.11.004 · DOI
  50. 10.1107/S1600576717007786 · DOI
  51. 10.1107/S1600576720013412 · DOI
  52. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1093/nar/gkw257 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 2013, Software for computing and annotating genomic ranges, PLoS computational biology, 9, e1003118, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003118 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.04.033 · DOI
  58. 10.1038/s41587-018-0001-2 · DOI
  59. 10.15252/msb.20188689 · DOI
  60. 2021, Photoactivatable ribonucleosides mark base-specific RNA-binding sites, Nat Commun, 12, 6026, 10.1038/s41467-021-26317-5 · DOI
  61. 2020, Chemical RNA digestion enables robust RNA-binding site mapping at single amino acid resolution, Nature structural & molecular biology, 27, 678, 10.1038/s41594-020-0436-2 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.09.029 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.09.030 · DOI
  64. 2021, Structure of SRSF1 RRM1 bound to RNA reveals an unexpected bimodal mode of interaction and explains its involvement in SMN1 exon7 splicing, Nat Commun, 12, 428, 10.1038/s41467-020-20481-w · DOI
  65. 10.1073/pnas.1303445110 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.005 · DOI
  67. 10.1038/nature07488 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.009 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1073/pnas.0901997106 · DOI
  70. 2010, iCLIP reveals the function of hnRNP particles in splicing at individual nucleotide resolution, Nature structural & molecular biology, 17, 909, 10.1038/nsmb.1838 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Schuller, S.K. , Schuller, J.M. , Prabu, J.R. , Baumgartner, M. , Bonneau, F. , Basquin, J. and Conti, E. (2020) Structural insights into the nucleic acid remodeling mechanisms of the yeast THO-Sub2 complex. eLife, 9. · DOI
  72. Xie, Y. , Clarke, B.P. , Kim, Y.J. , Ivey, A.L. , Hill, P.S. , Shi, Y. and Ren, Y. (2021) Cryo-EM structure of the yeast TREX complex and coordination with the SR-like protein Gbp2. eLife, 10. · DOI
  73. 2021, Structural and functional insights into R-loop prevention and mRNA export by budding yeast THO-Sub2 complex, Science Bulletin, 66, 2347, 10.1016/j.scib.2021.08.004 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.04.002 · DOI
  75. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.08.005 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.11.013 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.03.011 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Keil, P., Wulf, A., Kachariya, N., Reuscher, S., Hühn, K., Silbern, I., Altmüller, J., Stehle, R., Zarnack, K., Sattler, M., Urlaub, H., & Sträßer, K.
Affiliations
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Sattler, Michael
  • Urlaub, Henning
  • Sträßer, Katja
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-07-22
OpenAlex
W4286790147
Cited by
0
References
1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1035, SPP‐1935, GRK1721, SFB1286)
  • Technische Universität München
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
Npl3, RNA-binding proteins, RNA recognition motif, UV crosslinking, nuclear mRNA, chromatin recruitment, linker region, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, RNA-binding domain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review