The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA-measuring Wadjet SMC ATPases restrict smaller circular plasmids by DNA cleavage
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.11.015 · Paper page
Abstract
Summary: Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes fold DNA by loop extrusion to support chromosome segregation, genome maintenance, and gene expression. Wadjet systems (JetABCD/MksBEFG/EptABCD) are derivative SMC complexes with proposed roles in bacterial immunity against selfish DNA elements. Here, we show that JetABCD systems restrict extrachromosomal circular DNA with an upper size limit of about 100 kb, while a linear plasmid evades restriction. Recombinant preparations of a JetABCD complex cleave circular DNA regardless of its helical topology but not linear DNA; cleavage occurs at random positions and depends on ATP as well as the SMC ATPase. We solve a structure of the JetABCD core by cryo-EM revealing an alternative dimer-of-dimers configuration. The two SMC DNA motor units face in opposite orientations—rather than the same as observed with MukBEF—possibly representing a restriction-specific state of JetABCD. We hypothesize that JetABCD is a DNA-shape-specific endonuclease and present a model for the activation of DNA cleavage exclusively when extrusion of an entire plasmid has been completed by a single JetABCD complex. The self-stalling of two opposing DNA motor units may serve as signal to trigger DNA cleavage. Complete extrusion by a single complex cannot be achieved on the much larger chromosome, explaining how self-DNA may evade cleavage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 53
- 10.1107/S2059798318006551 · DOI
- 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90604-A · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-15238-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.10.011 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41594-019-0196-z · DOI
- 10.1038/nsmb.2488 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsmb1264 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaz3418 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkm216 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature17170 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.06.010 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12860-019-0211-6 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aar4120 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chom.2021.03.001 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
- Evans, R. , O’Neill, M. , Pritzel, A. , Antropova, N. , Senior, A. , Green, T. , Žídek, A. , Bates, R. , Blackwell, S. , Yim, J. , et al. (2022). Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioRxiv. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600680 · DOI
- 10.1128/AEM.01392-16 · DOI
- 10.1099/mgen.0.000484 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aar7831 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07764.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mib.2017.10.004 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010744 · DOI
- 10.1271/bbb.70.740 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-022-04546-y · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.07.035 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaz4475 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/sciadv.aba2489 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41594-020-0457-x · DOI
- 10.1107/S2059798319011471 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108344 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.02.003 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.026 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/18.21.6177 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac268 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2015.10.004 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1414207111 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07763.x · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.3943 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsb.2021.107702 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.4169 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.plasmid.2010.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.09.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.07.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.11.023 · DOI
- 10.15252/embj.2021107807 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00761 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/cdf393 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043633 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110411 · DOI
- 10.1093/gbe/evab256 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, H. W., Roisné-Hamelin, F., Beckert, B., Myasnikov, A., Li, Y., & Gruber, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Lausanne (CH)
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Gruber, Stephan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Molecular Cell
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-10-05
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 4727-4740.e6
- ISSN
- 1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4311746912
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15
- FWCI
- 7.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Molecular Cell (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- H2020 European Research Council (724482)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- SMC complex, circular plasmids, DNA cleavage, loop extrusion, DNA topology, selfish DNA, bacterial immunity, cryo-EM structure, MukBEF
- MeSH terms
- Adenosine Triphosphatases, Chromosomes, Chromosomes, Bacterial, DNA, Plasmids, Cell Cycle Proteins, DNA Cleavage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review