PreprintCited by 52RNA Research and SplicingMachine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

HydRA: Deep-learning models for predicting RNA-binding capacity from protein interaction association context and protein sequence

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.06.019 · Paper page

Abstract

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) control RNA metabolism to orchestrate gene expression, and dysfunctional RBPs underlie many human diseases. Proteome-wide discovery efforts predict thousands of novel RBPs, many of which lack canonical RNA-binding domains. Here, we present a hybrid ensemble RBP classifier (HydRA) that leverages information from both intermolecular protein interactions and internal protein sequence patterns to predict RNA-binding capacity with unparalleled specificity and sensitivity using support vector machine, convolutional neural networks and transformer-based protein language models. HydRA enables Occlusion Mapping to robustly detect known RNA-binding domains and to predict hundreds of uncharacterized RNA-binding domains. Enhanced CLIP validation for a diverse collection of RBP candidates reveals genome-wide targets and confirms RNA-binding activity for HydRA-predicted domains. The HydRA computational framework accelerates construction of a comprehensive RBP catalogue and expands the set of known RNA-binding protein domains. Highlights: HydRA combines protein-protein interaction and amino acid sequence information to predict RNA binding activity for 1,487 candidate genes. HydRA predicts RNA binding with higher specificity and sensitivity than current approaches, notably for RBPs without well-defined RNA-binding domains. Occlusion Mapping with HydRA enables RNA-binding domain discovery. Enhanced CLIP confirms HydRA RBP predictions with RNA-binding domain resolution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.12.23.521837

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 81

  1. 10.1038/nrg3813 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.tig.2008.05.004 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.tig.2013.01.004 · DOI
  4. 2018, A brave new world of RNA-binding proteins, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 19, 327, 10.1038/nrm.2017.130 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/ncomms10127 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.029 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/jmr.1061 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/prot.24441 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv629 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw730 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/nar/gkz203 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.09.003 · DOI
  13. 10.1145/3388440 · DOI
  14. 10.36227/techrxiv.12502298 · DOI
  15. 10.1101/2021.05.24.445464 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.09.003 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.043 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1038/nmeth.2561 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/nar/gkr930 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/nar/gkj109 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1093/nar/gkt1115 · DOI
  22. Yong, C. H. , Liu, G. , Chua, H. N. & Wong, L . Supervised maximum-likelihood weighting of composite protein networks for complex prediction. BMC Syst Biol 6, S13 (2012). · DOI
  23. 10.1371/journal.pone.0141287 · DOI
  24. 2022, POSTAR3: an updated platform for exploring post-transcriptional regulation coordinated by RNA-binding proteins, Nucleic Acids Res, 50, D287, 10.1093/nar/gkab702 · DOI
  25. 2021, Structure-based protein function prediction using graph convolutional networks, Nature Communications, 12, 1
  26. 2022, Prediction of protein–protein interaction using graph neural networks, Scientific Reports, 12, 1
  27. 2020, Fast and Flexible Protein Design Using Deep Graph Neural Networks, Cell Syst, 11, 402, 10.1016/j.cels.2020.08.016 · DOI
  28. 2018, A brave new world of RNA-binding proteins, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 19, 327, 10.1038/nrm.2017.130 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.031 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002726 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1074/mcp.M115.056564 · DOI
  33. 10.1074/jbc.REV118.002806 · DOI
  34. 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.40.1.617 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/s41388-018-0348-3 · DOI
  36. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1134-18.2018 · DOI
  37. 2018, 14-3-3 Proteins in Glutamatergic Synapses, Neural Plast, 2018, 8407609
  38. 2019, 14-3-3 signal adaptor and scaffold proteins mediate GPCR trafficking, Sci Rep, 9, 11156, 10.1038/s41598-019-47478-w · DOI
  39. 10.1038/s41587-018-0001-2 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.004 · DOI
  41. 10.1074/jbc.M511556200 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 2016, RNA-binding proteins in immune regulation: a focus on CCCH zinc finger proteins, Nature Reviews Immunology, 17, 130
  43. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.06.084 · DOI
  44. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00042 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/nmeth.3092 · DOI
  46. 10.1093/nar/gkaa977 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1038/nmeth.3810 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 2021, ChIP-R: Assembling reproducible sets of ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq peaks from multiple replicates, Genomics, 113, 1855, 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.04.026 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/nature22366 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1093/nar/gkh086 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1093/nar/gku1091 · DOI
  52. 10.1093/nar/gkw937 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.021 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/ncomms10127 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/ncomms11212 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.029 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.02.012 · DOI
  58. 10.1038/75556 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1093/nar/gku1179 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt072 · DOI
  62. 10.1038/srep11476 · DOI
  63. 2014, Autoencoder for words, Neurocomputing, 139, 84, 10.1016/j.neucom.2013.09.055 · DOI
  64. Chollet, F. and others. Keras . GitHub https://github.com/fchollet/keras Preprint at (2015).
  65. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm098 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1101/2022.02.07.479398 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 2022, ProteinBERT: a universal deep-learning model of protein sequence and function, Bioinformatics, 38, 2102, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac020 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.48550/arxiv.2012.09164 · DOI
  69. Paszke, A. et al. PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 32, (2019).
  70. 10.48550/arxiv.1903.02428 · DOI
  71. 10.1101/2022.05.25.493516 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 2021, CATH: Increased structural coverage of functional space, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, D266, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1079 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.09.034 · DOI
  74. 10.1093/nar/gks400 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti541 · DOI
  76. 10.1038/nsmb.2699 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1038/s41586-020-2077-3 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1093/nar/gkw1138 · DOI
  80. 2011, Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python, The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825
  81. Hagberg, A. A. , Schult Daniel A & Swart, P. J. Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function using NetworkX. Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy2008) 11–15 https://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/SciPy2008/paper_2/ (2008). · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Jin, W., Brannan, K. W., Kapeli, K., Park, S. S., Tan, H. Q., Gosztyla, M. L., Mujumdar, M., Ahdout, J., Henroid, B., Rothamel, K., Xiang, J. S., Wong, L., & Yeo, G. W.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Yeo, Gene W.
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-12-23
Volume
83
Issue
14
Pages
2595-2611.e11
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4383558074
Cited by
52
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 3
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RR220017)
  • Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group
  • National University of Singapore
  • National Institutes of Health (HG009889)
  • University of California, San Diego
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG004659, U24HG009889)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K22 K22NS112678, K22NS112678)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
RNA-binding proteins, RNA-binding domain, protein-protein interaction, protein sequence features, ensemble classifiers, convolutional neural networks, support vector machine, eCLIP
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Animals, Binding Sites, Humans, Hydra, Protein Binding, RNA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review