PreprintCited by 4Primate Behavior and EcologyLanguage and cultural evolutionNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brain areas for reversible symbolic reference, a potential singularity of the human brain

Open access
van Kerkoerle, Timo, Pape, Louise, Ekramnia, Milad, Feng, Xiaoxia, Tasserie, Jordy, Dupont, Morgan, Li, Xiaolian, Jarraya, Bechir, Vanduffel, Wim, Dehaene, Stanislas, Dehaene-Lambertz, Ghislaine·2023·eLife

Preprint — published as 10.7554/elife.87380.3

Abstract

The emergence of symbolic thinking has been proposed as a dominant cognitive criterion to distinguish humans from other primates during hominization. Although the proper definition of a symbol has been the subject of much debate, one of its simplest features is bidirectional attachment: the content is accessible from the symbol, and vice versa. Behavioural observations scattered over the past four decades suggest that this criterion might not be met in non-human primates, as they fail to generalise an association learned in one temporal order (A to B) to the reverse order (B to A). Here, we designed an implicit fMRI test to investigate the neural mechanisms of arbitrary audio-visual and visual-visual pairing in monkeys and humans and probe their spontaneous reversibility. After learning a unidirectional association, humans showed surprise signals when this learned association was violated. Crucially, this effect occurred spontaneously in both learned and reversed directions, within an extended network of high-level brain areas, including, but also going beyond, the language network. In monkeys, by contrast, violations of association effects occurred solely in the learned direction and were largely confined to sensory areas. We propose that a human-specific brain network may have evolved the capacity for reversible symbolic reference.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.03.04.531109

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on primates indicates that they often fail to reverse generalizations from one temporal order to another temporal order.

    “research on primates indicates that they often fail to reverse generalizations from one temporal order to another temporal order (van Kerkoerle et al., 2023).”

    From The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A" (2023) · cites this paper as van Kerkoerle et al., 2023

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 124

  1. 10.1098/rstb.2016.0515 · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.1603205113 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/s41593-020-0623-9 · DOI
  4. Berwick RC , Chomsky N . 2016. Why Only Us: Language and Evolution. The MIT Press. · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s41467-018-07280-0 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/cercor/bhx114 · DOI
  7. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2909-13.2013 · DOI
  8. 10.3758/s13420-022-00522-8 · DOI
  9. 10.1101/2021.06.01.446439 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0042-6989(74)90118-7 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.tics.2022.06.010 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.019 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3569-03.2004 · DOI
  14. 10.1162/0898929042568505 · DOI
  15. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050294 · DOI
  16. 10.1073/pnas.1721653115 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.7554/eLife.53232 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/B0-12-370878-8/00164-6 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/cercor/bhy243 · DOI
  21. 10.1073/pnas.1112937108 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1073/pnas.1315235110 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/nyas.13046 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.2006515117 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.020 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.1221166110 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031538 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.070 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1162/jocn_a_01857 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/s41598-021-81699-2 · DOI
  33. 10.1073/pnas.1610178113 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/nn.3683 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1073/pnas.1707695115 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/cne.1407 · DOI
  37. 10.1097/00006324-198509000-00009 · DOI
  38. 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.10.005 · DOI
  40. 10.1126/science.1067575 · DOI
  41. 10.1073/pnas.1201895109 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1098/rstb.2019.0319 · DOI
  43. 10.1073/pnas.1001229107 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1098/rstb.2011.0195 · DOI
  45. 10.1098/rspb.2019.0238 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104755 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.conb.2006.10.008 · DOI
  48. 10.1073/pnas.1809144116 · DOI
  49. 10.1126/science.1097859 · DOI
  50. 10.1093/cercor/bhw374 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-131 · DOI
  52. 10.1017/9781108131643.002 · DOI
  53. 10.1037/0278-7393.9.3.462 · DOI
  54. 10.1007/BF02735739 · DOI
  55. 10.1073/pnas.1412389112 · DOI
  56. 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-395 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.012 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1073/pnas.1404208111 · DOI
  59. 10.1007/s10071-010-0321-1 · DOI
  60. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4392-12.2013 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.042 · DOI
  62. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2318-11.2011 · DOI
  63. 2012, Interspecies activity correlations reveal functional correspondence between monkey and human brain areas, NatMethods, 9, 277
  64. 10.1016/j.conb.2009.04.007 · DOI
  65. 10.1038/315057a0 · DOI
  66. 10.1007/s10071-016-1003-4 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104613 · DOI
  68. 10.1073/pnas.1112895108 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1215-14.2014 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1162/jocn_a_00506 · DOI
  71. 10.1038/s41598-017-09925-4 · DOI
  72. 10.1126/sciadv.aao5961 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.11.012 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1093/ilar.40.2.78 · DOI
  75. Nieder A . 2019. A Brain for Numbers: The Biology of the Number Instinct. The MIT Press. · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.conb.2009.04.008 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035 · DOI
  78. 10.1162/jocn.2009.21330 · DOI
  79. 10.1073/pnas.1018711108 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.09.008 · DOI
  81. Passingham, R . 2008. What Is Special About the Human Brain? Oxford University Press. · DOI
  82. Patel AD . 2010. Music, Language, and the Brain. Oxford University Press, USA.
  83. 10.1017/S0140525X08003543 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Pepperberg IM . 2009. The Alex studies: cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Harvard University Press. · DOI
  85. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.003 · DOI
  86. 10.1038/s41598-019-39511-9 · DOI
  87. 2009, Optimizing the imaging of the monkey auditory cortex: sparse vs. continuous fMRI, Magn ResonImaging, 27, 1065
  88. 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.07.002 · DOI
  89. 10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.008 · DOI
  90. 10.1186/1471-2202-8-91 · DOI
  91. 10.1126/science.172.3985.808 · DOI
  92. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3421-17.2018 · DOI · Paper page
  93. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.013 · DOI
  94. 10.3389/fnevo.2011.00011 · DOI
  95. 10.1038/nn2072 · DOI · Paper page
  96. 2014, Basic neuroscience research with nonhuman primates: a small but indispensable component of biomedical research, Neuron, 82, 1200, 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.06.003 · DOI
  97. Sablé-Meyer M , Fagot J , Caparos S , van Kerkoerle T , Amalric M , Dehaene S . 2021. Sensitivity to geometric shape regularity in humans and baboons: A putative signature of human singularity. ProcNatlAcadSciUSA 118. · DOI
  98. 10.1093/cercor/bhp138 · DOI
  99. 10.1006/anbe.1997.0654 · DOI
  100. 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.10.048 · DOI
  101. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4719-09.2010 · DOI
  102. 10.1038/s41586-021-03953-x · DOI
  103. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4558-12.2013 · DOI
  104. 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-23 · DOI
  105. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.020 · DOI
  106. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1874-12.2012 · DOI
  107. Spelke E . 2003. What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language In: Gentner D , Goldin-Meadow S , editors. Language in Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. · DOI
  108. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.022 · DOI
  109. 10.1093/cercor/bhx070 · DOI
  110. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116353 · DOI
  111. 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  112. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3165-13.2014 · DOI
  113. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00502-5 · DOI
  114. 10.1126/science.1073574 · DOI
  115. Vergnieux V , Vogels R . 2020. Statistical Learning Signals for Complex Visual Images in Macaque Early Visual Cortex. Frontiers in Neuroscience 14. · DOI
  116. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.061 · DOI
  117. 10.1016/0047-2484(74)90004-9 · DOI
  118. 10.1038/s41598-019-38833-y · DOI
  119. 10.1016/j.tins.2016.11.004 · DOI
  120. 10.1016/j.tins.2008.08.008 · DOI · Paper page
  121. 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00155 · DOI
  122. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01543.x · DOI
  123. 10.1073/pnas.1216803110 · DOI · Paper page
  124. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0603-21.2021 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
van Kerkoerle, T., Pape, L., Ekramnia, M., Feng, X., Tasserie, J., Dupont, M., Li, X., Jarraya, B., Vanduffel, W., Dehaene, S., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
van Kerkoerle, Timo
Venue
eLife
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-03-04
Volume
12
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407389522
Cited by
4
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission (695403, HORIZON2020, 695710, 101078667)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-23-IAHU-0010)
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G0C1920N, G0E0520N)
  • KU Leuven (C14/21/111, G0C1920N)
  • Vlaamse regering (C14/21/111)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
symbolic references, reversibility, symbolic thinking, human evolution, non-human primates, audio-visual association, surprise, language network, primate cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review