The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Brain areas for reversible symbolic reference, a potential singularity of the human brain
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.7554/elife.87380.3
Abstract
The emergence of symbolic thinking has been proposed as a dominant cognitive criterion to distinguish humans from other primates during hominization. Although the proper definition of a symbol has been the subject of much debate, one of its simplest features is bidirectional attachment: the content is accessible from the symbol, and vice versa. Behavioural observations scattered over the past four decades suggest that this criterion might not be met in non-human primates, as they fail to generalise an association learned in one temporal order (A to B) to the reverse order (B to A). Here, we designed an implicit fMRI test to investigate the neural mechanisms of arbitrary audio-visual and visual-visual pairing in monkeys and humans and probe their spontaneous reversibility. After learning a unidirectional association, humans showed surprise signals when this learned association was violated. Crucially, this effect occurred spontaneously in both learned and reversed directions, within an extended network of high-level brain areas, including, but also going beyond, the language network. In monkeys, by contrast, violations of association effects occurred solely in the learned direction and were largely confined to sensory areas. We propose that a human-specific brain network may have evolved the capacity for reversible symbolic reference.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research on primates indicates that they often fail to reverse generalizations from one temporal order to another temporal order.
“research on primates indicates that they often fail to reverse generalizations from one temporal order to another temporal order (van Kerkoerle et al., 2023).”
From The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A" (2023) · cites this paper as van Kerkoerle et al., 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situating the default-mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization
Margulies, D. S., Ghosh, S. S., Goulas, A., Falkiewicz, M., Huntenburg, J. M., Langs, G., Bezgin, G., Eickhoff, S. B., Castellanos, F. X., Petrides, M., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1608282113 · Cited by 2,321
Representation of Numerical and Sequential Patterns in Macaque and Human Brains
Wang, L., Uhrig, L., Jarraya, B., & Dehaene, S. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.035 · Cited by 166
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 124
- 10.1098/rstb.2016.0515 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1603205113 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41593-020-0623-9 · DOI
- Berwick RC , Chomsky N . 2016. Why Only Us: Language and Evolution. The MIT Press. · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-018-07280-0 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhx114 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2909-13.2013 · DOI
- 10.3758/s13420-022-00522-8 · DOI
- 10.1101/2021.06.01.446439 · DOI
- 10.1016/0042-6989(74)90118-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tics.2022.06.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.019 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3569-03.2004 · DOI
- 10.1162/0898929042568505 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050294 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1721653115 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7554/eLife.53232 · DOI
- 10.1016/B0-12-370878-8/00164-6 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhy243 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1112937108 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1315235110 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/nyas.13046 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2006515117 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.020 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1221166110 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031538 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.070 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1162/jocn_a_01857 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-021-81699-2 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1610178113 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn.3683 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1707695115 · DOI
- 10.1002/cne.1407 · DOI
- 10.1097/00006324-198509000-00009 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.10.005 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1067575 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1201895109 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rstb.2019.0319 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1001229107 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rstb.2011.0195 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2019.0238 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104755 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.conb.2006.10.008 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1809144116 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1097859 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhw374 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-131 · DOI
- 10.1017/9781108131643.002 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.9.3.462 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02735739 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1412389112 · DOI
- 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-395 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1404208111 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10071-010-0321-1 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4392-12.2013 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.042 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2318-11.2011 · DOI
- 2012, Interspecies activity correlations reveal functional correspondence between monkey and human brain areas, NatMethods, 9, 277
- 10.1016/j.conb.2009.04.007 · DOI
- 10.1038/315057a0 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10071-016-1003-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104613 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1112895108 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1215-14.2014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1162/jocn_a_00506 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-017-09925-4 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.aao5961 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.11.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/ilar.40.2.78 · DOI
- Nieder A . 2019. A Brain for Numbers: The Biology of the Number Instinct. The MIT Press. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.conb.2009.04.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.035 · DOI
- 10.1162/jocn.2009.21330 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1018711108 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.09.008 · DOI
- Passingham, R . 2008. What Is Special About the Human Brain? Oxford University Press. · DOI
- Patel AD . 2010. Music, Language, and the Brain. Oxford University Press, USA.
- 10.1017/S0140525X08003543 · DOI · Paper page
- Pepperberg IM . 2009. The Alex studies: cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Harvard University Press. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.003 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-019-39511-9 · DOI
- 2009, Optimizing the imaging of the monkey auditory cortex: sparse vs. continuous fMRI, Magn ResonImaging, 27, 1065
- 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.07.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.008 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2202-8-91 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.172.3985.808 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3421-17.2018 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.013 · DOI
- 10.3389/fnevo.2011.00011 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn2072 · DOI · Paper page
- 2014, Basic neuroscience research with nonhuman primates: a small but indispensable component of biomedical research, Neuron, 82, 1200, 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.06.003 · DOI
- Sablé-Meyer M , Fagot J , Caparos S , van Kerkoerle T , Amalric M , Dehaene S . 2021. Sensitivity to geometric shape regularity in humans and baboons: A putative signature of human singularity. ProcNatlAcadSciUSA 118. · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhp138 · DOI
- 10.1006/anbe.1997.0654 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.10.048 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4719-09.2010 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03953-x · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4558-12.2013 · DOI
- 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-23 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.020 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1874-12.2012 · DOI
- Spelke E . 2003. What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language In: Gentner D , Goldin-Meadow S , editors. Language in Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.022 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/bhx070 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116353 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3165-13.2014 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00502-5 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1073574 · DOI
- Vergnieux V , Vogels R . 2020. Statistical Learning Signals for Complex Visual Images in Macaque Early Visual Cortex. Frontiers in Neuroscience 14. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.061 · DOI
- 10.1016/0047-2484(74)90004-9 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-019-38833-y · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tins.2016.11.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tins.2008.08.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00155 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01543.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1216803110 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0603-21.2021 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"
Berglund, L., Tong, M., Kaufmann, M., Balesni, M., Stickland, A. C., Korbak, T., & Evans, O. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.12288 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- van Kerkoerle, T., Pape, L., Ekramnia, M., Feng, X., Tasserie, J., Dupont, M., Li, X., Jarraya, B., Vanduffel, W., Dehaene, S., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Inserm (FR)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- van Kerkoerle, Timo
- ORCID
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-03-04
- Volume
- 12
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4407389522
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- European Commission (695403, HORIZON2020, 695710, 101078667)
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-23-IAHU-0010)
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G0C1920N, G0E0520N)
- KU Leuven (C14/21/111, G0C1920N)
- Vlaamse regering (C14/21/111)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- symbolic references, reversibility, symbolic thinking, human evolution, non-human primates, audio-visual association, surprise, language network, primate cognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review