Cited by 150Visual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionFace Recognition and Perception

Suppressed Sensory Response to Predictable Object Stimuli throughout the Ventral Visual Stream

Open access
Richter, David, Ekman, Matthias, de Lange, Floris P.·2018·The Journal of Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Prediction plays a crucial role in perception, as prominently suggested by predictive coding theories. However, the exact form and mechanism of predictive modulations of sensory processing remain unclear, with some studies reporting a downregulation of the sensory response for predictable input whereas others observed an enhanced response. In a similar vein, downregulation of the sensory response for predictable input has been linked to either sharpening or dampening of the sensory representation, which are opposite in nature. In the present study, we set out to investigate the neural consequences of perceptual expectation of object stimuli throughout the visual hierarchy, using fMRI in human volunteers. Participants of both sexes were exposed to pairs of sequentially presented object images in a statistical learning paradigm, in which the first object predicted the identity of the second object. Image transitions were not task relevant; thus, all learning of statistical regularities was incidental. We found strong suppression of neural responses to expected compared with unexpected stimuli throughout the ventral visual stream, including primary visual cortex, lateral occipital complex, and anterior ventral visual areas. Expectation suppression in lateral occipital complex scaled positively with image preference and voxel selectivity, lending support to the dampening account of expectation suppression in object perception. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT It has been suggested that the brain fundamentally relies on predictions and constructs models of the world to make sense of sensory information. Previous research on the neural basis of prediction has documented suppressed neural responses to expected compared with unexpected stimuli. In the present study, we demonstrate robust expectation suppression throughout the entire ventral visual stream, and underlying this suppression a dampening of the sensory representation in object-selective visual cortex, but not in primary visual cortex. Together, our results provide novel evidence in support of theories conceptualizing perception as an active inference process, which selectively dampens cortical representations of predictable objects. This dampening may support our ability to automatically filter out irrelevant, predictable objects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3421-17.2018

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Complex stimuli like faces may not yield any specific predictions at the level of detail pertaining to the simple stimulus preferences of V1 receptive fields.

    “For example, complex stimuli like faces may not yield any specific predictions at the level of detail pertaining to the simple stimulus preferences of V1 receptive fields.”

    From Evaluating the neurophysiological evidence for predictive processing as a model of perception (2020) · cites this paper as [79]

    The section on dampening in object-selective cortex proposes that object-specific expectations may be resolved higher in the visual hierarchy, with only an expected-versus-unexpected signal fed back to V1. That supports the claim’s tentative point about limited object-specific prediction in V1. The paper studies object images, however, and does not establish the proposed explanation in terms of faces or the simple stimulus preferences of V1 receptive fields. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some studies have reported that expected stimulus representations are dampened.

    “some studies have reported that expected stimulus representations are dampened”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richter, D., Ekman, M., & de Lange, F. P.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2018-07-20
Volume
38
Issue
34
Pages
7452-7461
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2781952111
Cited by
150
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (452-14-016, 452-13-016)
  • H2020 European Research Council (678286)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
predictive coding, ventral stream, object perception, statistical learning, incidental learning, lateral occipital complex, primary visual cortex, active inference, perceptual expectations, image preference
MeSH terms
Bayes Theorem, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Neurological, Occipital Lobe, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Visual Cortex, Visual Pathways, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review