CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 767

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The evolution of the arcuate fasciculus revealed with comparative DTI

Rilling, James K, Glasser, Matthew F, Preuss, Todd M, Ma, Xiangyang, Zhao, Tiejun, Hu, Xiaoping, Behrens, Timothy E J·2008·Nature Neuroscience
DOI 10.1038/nn2072
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The arcuate fasciculus is a white-matter fiber tract that is involved in human language. Here we compared cortical connectivity in humans, chimpanzees and macaques (Macaca mulatta) and found a prominent temporal lobe projection of the human arcuate fasciculus that is much smaller or absent in nonhuman primates. This human specialization may be relevant to the evolution of language.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn2072

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our ancestors constructed a world sufficiently rich in symbolism to generate evolutionary feedback, in the form of self-modified selection pressures that favored structures in the mind that functioned to manipulate and use those symbols with efficiency.

    “Like others (Deacon, 1997; Bickerton, 2009), I suspect that our ancestors constructed a world sufficiently rich in symbolism to generate evolutionary feedback, in the form of self-modified selection pressures that favored structures in the mind that functioned to manipulate and use those symbols with efficiency (Rilling et al., 2008; Schenker et al., 2010; Erwin et al., 2010).”

    From The origins of language in teaching (2017) · cites this paper as Rilling et al., 2008

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Geschwind, N. Science 170, 940–944 (1970). · DOI
  2. Glasser, M.F. & Rilling, J.K. Cereb. Cortex published online, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn011 (14 February 2008). · DOI
  3. Powell, H.W. et al. Neuroimage 32, 388–399 (2006). · DOI
  4. Petrides, M. & Pandya, D.N. in Principles of Frontal Lobe Function (eds. Stuss, D.T. & Knight, R.T.) 31–50 (Oxford University Press, New York, 2002). · DOI
  5. Behrens, T.E., Berg, H.J., Jbabdi, S., Rushworth, M.F. & Woolrich, M.W. Neuroimage 34, 144–155 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Price, C.J. J. Anat. 197, 335–359 (2000). · DOI
  7. Sakai, K.L. Science 310, 815–819 (2005). · DOI
  8. Rilling, J.K. & Seligman, R.A. J. Hum. Evol. 42, 505–533 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Preuss, T.M. in The Cognitive Neurosciences 3rd edn. (ed. Gazzaniga, M.S.) 5–22 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2004).
  10. Deacon, T. The Symbolic Species (W.W. Norton, New York, 1997).
  11. Schoenemann, P.T., Sheehan, M.J. & Glotzer, L.D. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 242–252 (2005). · DOI
  12. Gould, S.J. J. Soc. Issues 47, 43–65 (1991). · DOI
  13. Johnson-Frey, S.H., Newman-Norlund, R. & Grafton, S.T. Cereb. Cortex 15, 681–695 (2005). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rilling, J. K., Glasser, M. F., Preuss, T. M., Ma, X., Zhao, T., Hu, X., & Behrens, T. E. J.
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2008-03-23
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
426-428
ISSN
  • 1097-6256
  • 1546-1726
DOI
10.1038/nn2072
Cited by
767
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review