The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flexible Protein-Protein Docking with a Multi-Track Iterative Transformer
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/pro.4862 · Paper page
Abstract
Conventional protein-protein docking algorithms usually rely on heavy candidate sampling and re-ranking, but these steps are time-consuming and hinder applications that require high-throughput complex structure prediction, e.g., structure-based virtual screening. Existing deep learning methods for protein-protein docking, despite being much faster, suffer from low docking success rates. In addition, they simplify the problem to assume no conformational changes within any protein upon binding (rigid docking). This assumption precludes applications when binding-induced conformational changes play a role, such as allosteric inhibition or docking from uncertain unbound model structures. To address these limitations, we present GeoDock, a multi-track iterative transformer network to predict a docked structure from separate docking partners. Unlike deep learning models for protein structure prediction that input multiple sequence alignments (MSAs), GeoDock inputs just the sequences and structures of the docking partners, which suits the tasks when the individual structures are given. GeoDock is flexible at the protein residue level, allowing the prediction of conformational changes upon binding. For a benchmark set of rigid targets, GeoDock obtains a 41% success rate, outperforming all the other tested methods. For a more challenging benchmark set of flexible targets, GeoDock achieves a similar number of top-model successes as the traditional method ClusPro [1], but fewer than ReplicaDock2 [2]. GeoDock attains an average inference speed of under one second on a single GPU, enabling its application in large-scale structure screening. Although binding-induced conformational changes are still a challenge owing to limited training and evaluation data, our architecture sets up the foundation to capture this backbone flexibility. Code and a demonstration Jupyter notebook are available at https://github.com/Graylab/GeoDock .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 66
- 10.1093/nar/gnh082 · DOI
- 2022, Induced fit with replica exchange improves protein complex structure prediction, PLOS Computational Biology, 18, e1010124, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010124 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- Ruidong Wu , Fan Ding , Rui Wang , Rui Shen , Xiwen Zhang , Shitong Luo , Chenpeng Su , Zuofan Wu , Qi Xie , Bonnie Berger , et al. High-resolution de novo structure prediction from primary sequence. BioRxiv, 2022.
- Zeming Lin , Halil Akin , Roshan Rao , Brian Hie , Zhongkai Zhu , Wenting Lu , Allan dos Santos Costa , Maryam Fazel-Zarandi , Tom Sercu , Sal Candido , et al. Language models of protein sequences at the scale of evolution enable accurate structure prediction. BioRxiv, 2022.
- 2022, Helixfold: An efficient implementation of alphafold2 using paddlepaddle, arXiv preprint
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkh131 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.02.005 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1203 · DOI
- 1997, Evaluation of gramm low-resolution docking methodology on the hemagglutininantibody complex, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 29, 226, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(1997)1+<226::AID-PROT31>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
- 10.1093/protein/14.2.105 · DOI
- 2002, Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 47, 281, 10.1002/prot.10092 · DOI
- 2003, Zdock: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 52, 80, 10.1002/prot.10389 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1110/ps.26002 · DOI
- 2006, Piper: an fft-based protein docking program with pairwise potentials, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 65, 392, 10.1002/prot.21117 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.89.6.2195 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90153-X · DOI
- Dina Duhovny , Ruth Nussinov , and Haim J Wolfson. Efficient unbound docking of rigid molecules . In International workshop on algorithms in bioinformatics, pages 185–200. Springer, 2002. · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gki481 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1471-2105-10-1 · DOI
- 2012, Multi-lzerd: multiple protein docking for asymmetric complexes, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 80, 1818, 10.1002/prot.24079 · DOI
- 2001, Protein docking using a genetic algorithm, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 44, 44, 10.1002/prot.1070 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00670-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.07.050 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.05.042 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty355 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1110/ps.0239303 · DOI
- 2005, Attract: protein–protein docking in capri using a reduced protein model, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 60, 252, 10.1002/prot.20566 · DOI
- 2006, Accounting for loop flexibility during protein–protein docking, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 62, 956, 10.1002/prot.20770 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja026939x · DOI · Paper page
- 2007, HADDOCK versus HADDOCK: new features and performance of HADDOCK2. 0 on the capri targets, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 69, 726, 10.1002/prot.21723 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.540150503 · DOI
- 2003, Icm-disco docking by global energy optimization with fully flexible side-chains, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 52, 113, 10.1002/prot.10383 · DOI
- 2010, Swarmdock and the use of normal modes in protein-protein docking, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 11, 3623, 10.3390/ijms11103623 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.11.005 · DOI
- 2020, Deciphering interaction fingerprints from protein molecular surfaces using geometric deep learning, Nature Methods, 17, 184, 10.1038/s41592-019-0666-6 · DOI
- Jérôme Tubiana , Dina Schneidman-Duhovny , and Haim J Wolfson . Scannet: An interpretable geometric deep learning model for structure-based protein binding site prediction. Nature Methods, pages 1–10, 2022. · DOI · Paper page
- Alex Fout , Jonathon Byrd , Basir Shariat , and Asa Ben-Hur . Protein interface prediction using graph convolutional networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 2017.
- Raphael Townshend , Rishi Bedi , Patricia Suriana , and Ron Dror . End-to-end learning on 3d protein structure for interface prediction. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019.
- Yi Liu , Hao Yuan , Lei Cai , and Shuiwang Ji . Deep learning of high-order interactions for protein interface prediction. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining, pages 679–687, 2020. · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Deep graph learning of inter-protein contacts, Bioinformatics, 38, 947, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab761 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Protein interaction interface region prediction by geometric deep learning, Bioinformatics, 37, 2580, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab154 · DOI
- 2021, Dncon2_inter: predicting interchain contacts for homodimeric and homomultimeric protein complexes using multiple sequence alignments of monomers and deep learning, Scientific Reports, 11, 1
- 2021, Accurate prediction of inter-protein residue–residue contacts for homo-oligomeric protein complexes, Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22, bbab038, 10.1093/bib/bbab038 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac063 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Drlcomplex: Reconstruction of protein quaternary structures using deep reinforcement learning, arXiv preprint
- Usman Ghani , Israel Desta , Akhil Jindal , Omeir Khan , George Jones , Nasser Hashemi , Sergey Kotelnikov , Dzmitry Padhorny , Sandor Vajda , and Dima Kozakov . Improved docking of protein models by a combination of alphafold2 and cluspro. BioRxiv, pages 2021–09, 2022. · DOI · Paper page
- Milot Mirdita , Konstantin Schütze , Yoshitaka Moriwaki , Lim Heo , Sergey Ovchinnikov , and Martin Steinegger . Colabfold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nature Methods, pages 1–4, 2022. · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Af2complex predicts direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning, Nature Communications, 13, 1
- Richard Evans , Michael O’Neill , Alexander Pritzel , Natasha Antropova , Andrew W Senior , Timothy Green , Augustin Žíde k, Russell Bates , Sam Blackwell , Jason Yim , et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. BioRxiv, 2021. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pro.4379 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Independent se (3)-equivariant models for end-to-end rigid protein docking, arXiv preprint
- Freyr Sverrisson , Jean Feydy , Bruno E Correia , and Michael M Bronstein . Fast end-to-end learning on protein surfaces. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 15272–15281, 2021. · DOI
- Matthew McPartlon and Jinbo Xu . Deep learning for flexible and site-specific protein docking and design. BioRxiv, 2023. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.07.016 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, An expanded benchmark for antibody-antigen docking and affinity prediction reveals insights into antibody recognition determinants, Structure, 29, 606, 10.1016/j.str.2021.01.005 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0161879 · DOI · Paper page
- 2003, Capri: a critical assessment of predicted interactions, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 52, 2, 10.1002/prot.10381 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkx407 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2020.06.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2016.06.025 · DOI
- 2022, DiffDock: Diffusion steps, twists, and turns for molecular docking, arXiv preprint
Metadata
- Authors
- Chu, L.-S., Ruffolo, J. A., Harmalkar, A., & Gray, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gray, Jeffrey J.
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-07-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e4862-e4862
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10804679
- OpenAlex
- W4390245367
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 3.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Johns Hopkins University
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM008403, R35GM141881, T32GM135131)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- protein-protein docking, flexible docking, structure-based virtual screening, immune complexes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review