PreprintCited by 23Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactantsMicrobial metabolism and enzyme functionMicrobial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nitrate-driven anaerobic oxidation of ethane and butane by bacteria

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1093/ismejo/wrad011 · Paper page

Abstract

The short-chain gaseous alkanes (ethane, propane and butane; SCGAs) are important components of natural gas, yet our understanding of their fate in environmental systems is poorly understood. Microbially mediated anaerobic oxidation of SCGAs coupled to nitrate reduction has been demonstrated for propane, but is yet to be shown for ethane or butane – despite being energetically feasible. Here we report two independent bacterial enrichments performing anaerobic ethane and butane oxidation, respectively, coupled to nitrate reduction to dinitrogen gas and ammonium. Isotopic 13 C-and 15 N-labelling experiments, mass and electron balance tests, and metabolite and meta-omics analyses collectively reveal that the recently described propane-oxidising ‘ Candidatus Alkanivorans nitratireducens’ was also responsible for nitrate-dependent anaerobic oxidation of the SCGAs in both these enrichments. The complete genome of this species encodes alkylsuccinate synthase genes for the activation of ethane/butane via fumarate addition. Further substrate range tests confirm ‘ Ca. A. nitratireducens’ is metabolically versatile, being able to degrade ethane, propane and butane under anaerobic conditions. Moreover, our study proves nitrate as an additional electron sink for ethane and butane in anaerobic environments, and for the first time demonstrates the use of the fumarate addition pathway in anaerobic ethane oxidation. These findings significantly contribute to our understanding of microbial metabolism of SCGAs in anaerobic environments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.08.24.554723

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. 2000, Distributions of C 2–C 6 hydrocarbons over the western North Pacific and eastern Indian Ocean, Atmospheric environment, 34, 4373, 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00249-1 · DOI
  2. 2002, Non-methane hydrocarbons in the Arctic boundary layer, Atmospheric Environment, 36, 3217, 10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00324-2 · DOI
  3. 2018, Changes in atmospheric butanes and pentanes and their isomeric ratios in the continental United States, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 123, 3772, 10.1002/2017JD027709 · DOI
  4. 2022, Scattering and absorbing aerosols in the climate system, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3, 363, 10.1038/s43017-022-00296-7 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.09.079 · DOI
  6. Pozzer, A., et al. Observed and simulated global distribution and budget of atmospheric C 2-C 5 alkanes. Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics 10 (2010). · DOI
  7. 2016, Reversal of global atmospheric ethane and propane trends largely due to US oil and natural gas production, Nature Geoscience, 9, 490, 10.1038/ngeo2721 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2015, The anaerobic degradation of gaseous, nonmethane alkanes—From in situ processes to microorganisms, Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 13, 222, 10.1016/j.csbj.2015.03.002 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.1817784116 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/jctb.1388 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/s41586-019-1063-0 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nature20152 · DOI
  13. Kniemeyer, O. et al. Anaerobic oxidation of short-chain hydrocarbons by marine sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nature 449, 898 (2007). · DOI
  14. 10.1111/1462-2920.15956 · DOI
  15. 2022, Anaerobic oxidation of propane coupled to nitrate reduction by a lineage within the class Symbiobacteriia, Nature Communications, 13, 6115, 10.1038/s41467-022-33872-y · DOI
  16. Addiscott, T. M . Nitrate, agriculture and the environment. (CABI, 2005). · DOI
  17. Singh, S. et al. Nitrates in the environment: A critical review of their distribution, sensing techniques, ecological effects and remediation. Chemosphere 287, 131996 (2022). · DOI
  18. Hahn, C. J. et al. “Candidatus Ethanoperedens,” a thermophilic genus of archaea mediating the anaerobic oxidation of ethane. MBio 11 (2020). · DOI
  19. Jaekel, U. et al. Anaerobic degradation of propane and butane by sulfate-reducing bacteria enriched from marine hydrocarbon cold seeps. The ISME journal 7, 885 (2013). · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00866.x · DOI
  21. 10.1128/JB.183.5.1707-1715.2001 · DOI
  22. 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8174-8182.2005 · DOI
  23. Cravo-Laureau, C. , Grossi, V. , Raphel, D. , Matheron, R. & Hirschler-Réa, A. s. Anaerobic n-alkane metabolism by a sulfate-reducing bacterium, Desulfatibacillum aliphaticivorans strain C V2803T. Applied and environmental microbiology 71, 3458- 3467 (2005). · DOI
  24. 10.1128/AEM.02896-05 · DOI
  25. 2009, Biocorrosive thermophilic microbial communities in Alaskan North Slope oil facilities, Environmental science & technology, 43, 7977, 10.1021/es9013932 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02282.x · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01272.x · DOI
  28. 2017, Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy, The ISME journal, 11, 2399, 10.1038/ismej.2017.113 · DOI
  29. 10.1186/s13059-020-1935-5 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 2010, CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for the functional annotation of proteins, Nucleic acids research, 39, D225
  31. 10.1021/ja404842r · DOI
  32. 10.1074/jbc.M115.670737 · DOI
  33. 2018, Lifetimes, direct and indirect radiative forcing, and global warming potentials of ethane (C2H6), propane (C3H8), and butane (C4H10), Atmospheric Science Letters, 19, e804, 10.1002/asl.804 · DOI
  34. 2015, Retrieval of ethane from ground-based FTIR solar spectra using improved spectroscopy: Recent burden increase above Jungfraujoch, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 160, 36, 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.03.017 · DOI
  35. Daims, H. , Stoecker, K. & Wagner, M. in Molecular microbial ecology 208–228 (Taylor & Francis, 2004).
  36. 10.1021/ac010088e · DOI
  37. 2009, Removal of nitrite with sulfamic acid for nitrate N and O isotope analysis with the denitrifier method, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry: An International Journal Devoted to the Rapid Dissemination of Up- to- the-Minute Research in Mass Spectrometry, 23, 3753, 10.1002/rcm.4307 · DOI
  38. 2015, Adaptation of micro-diffusion method for the analysis of 15N natural abundance of ammonium in samples with small volume, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 29, 1297, 10.1002/rcm.7224 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty149 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595 · DOI
  42. 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1038/nmeth.3103 · DOI
  45. 2021, Improved metagenome binning and assembly using deep variational autoencoders, Nat Biotechnol, 39, 555, 10.1038/s41587-020-00777-4 · DOI
  46. 10.7717/peerj.1165 · DOI
  47. 10.7717/peerj.7359 · DOI
  48. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv638 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/s41467-022-29843-y · DOI
  50. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383 · DOI
  51. 2018, Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy, Nat Microbiol, 3, 836, 10.1038/s41564-018-0171-1 · DOI
  52. 10.1101/gr.186072.114 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Chaumeil, P. A. , Mussig, A. J. , Hugenholtz, P. & Parks, D. H . GTDB-Tk v2: memory friendly classification with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics (2022). · DOI
  54. 10.1038/nmeth.1923 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Robinson, J. T. , et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol 29, 24–26 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  56. Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068-2069 (2014). · DOI
  57. Aramaki, T. et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm098 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1038/nmeth.3176 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1093/nar/gky1085 · DOI
  61. 10.1101/2021.06.03.446934 · DOI
  62. 2020, A complete domain-to-species taxonomy for Bacteria and Archaea, Nat Biotechnol, 38, 1079, 10.1038/s41587-020-0501-8 · DOI
  63. 10.1038/nbt.4229 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Hyatt, D. et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 119 (2010). · DOI
  65. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Price, M. N. , Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2--approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5, e9490 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1093/nar/gkh293 · DOI
  68. 10.1093/nar/gkh340 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348 · DOI
  70. Liu, Y. et al. CB-Dock2: improved protein–ligand blind docking by integrating cavity detection, docking and homologous template fitting. Nucleic Acids Res. (2022). · DOI
  71. 10.1002/jcc.20945 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1063/1.1808117 · DOI
  73. 10.1038/nmeth.4067 · DOI
  74. 10.1038/s41598-020-59121-0 · DOI
  75. 10.1002/jcc.20289 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 2021, Computational study on the function of palmitoylation on the envelope protein in SARS-CoV-2, J. Chem. Theory Comput, 17, 6483, 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00359 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Wu, M., Li, J., Lai, C.-Y., Leu, A. O., Sun, S., Gu, R., Erler, D. V., Liu, L., Li, L., Tyson, G. W., Yuan, Z., McIlroy, S. J., & Guo, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Translational Research Institute (AU)
  • The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
  • Southern Cross University (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Lai, Chun-Yu
  • Guo, Jianhua
Venue
The ISME Journal
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-08-25
Volume
18
Issue
1
ISSN
1751-7362 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390704517
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The ISME Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • CityU Scholars (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council (FT170100070, FT190100211, FT170100196, FL170100086)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (SC1GM132043)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial metabolism and enzyme function
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
Keywords
nitrate reduction, ammonium production, microbial enrichment cultures, electron sink
MeSH terms
Anaerobiosis, Bacteria, Butanes, Ethane, Fumarates, Gases, Nitrates, Oxidation-Reduction, Propane

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review