PreprintCited by 34Machine Learning in HealthcareRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pretrained transformers applied to clinical studies improve predictions of treatment efficacy and associated biomarkers

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-025-57181-2

Abstract

Cancer treatment has made significant advancements in recent decades, leading to improved outcomes and quality of life for many patients. Despite the array of available therapies, including targeted, hormone, and checkpoint blockade immunotherapy, many patients experience treatment failure or eventual resistance. Attempts to predict the efficacy of therapies, particularly immuno-oncology therapies, have suffered from limited accuracy and difficulties in identifying molecular and other determinants of response. Improving treatment prediction alone is insufficient to create clinically meaningful research tools; additional prerequisites for this goal involve accommodating small data sets, effectively handling sparse features, integrating diverse clinical data, addressing missing measurements, ensuring interpretability, and extracting valuable biological insights for both clinical context and further research. Multimodal deep-learning models offer a promising avenue to surmount these challenges by leveraging their capacity and flexibility to learn from expansive and varied clinical and molecular data sets. Similar to their application in natural language and other domains, deep-learning models can uncover complex relationships within data that are pertinent to survival and treatment response. In this study, we introduce an explainable transformer-based deep-learning framework that addresses these challenges. This framework yields predictions of survival outcomes, as quantified by concordance index, that surpass the performance of state-of-the-art methods such as Cox proportional hazards, survival random forest, and tumor mutation burden, across diverse independent data sets. We developed the clinical transformer, a deep neural-network survival prediction framework that capitalizes on the flexibility of the deep-learning model, including training strategies like gradual and transfer learning, to maximize the use of available data to enhance survival predictions and generate actionable biological insights. Finally, we illustrate the future potential of the clinical transformer’s generative capability in early-stage clinical studies. By perturbing molecular features associated with immune checkpoint inhibition treatment in immunotherapy-naive patient profiles, we identified a subset of patients who may benefit from immunotherapy. These findings were subsequently validated across three independent immunotherapy treatment cohorts. We anticipate that this research will empower the scientific community to further harness data for the benefit of patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.09.12.23295357

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 10.1038/nrd.2016.32 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/nrc.2016.56 · DOI
  3. 2022, Improved prediction of immune checkpoint blockade efficacy across multiple cancer types, Nature Biotechnology, 40, 499, 10.1038/s41587-021-01070-8 · DOI
  4. 2022, Multimodal integration of radiology, pathology and genomics for prediction of response to PD-(L) 1 blockade in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, Nature cancer, 3, 1151, 10.1038/s43018-022-00416-8 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Swanson, K. , Wu, E. , Zhang, A. , Alizadeh, A.A. & Zou, J . From patterns to patients: Advances in clinical machine learning for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Cell (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/s41586-019-1730-1 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/s41591-021-01450-2 · DOI
  8. 10.1056/NEJMoa1501824 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30445-9 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1056/NEJMoa1910231 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Vaswani, A. et al. in 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 6000-6010 (Long Beach, CA; 2017).
  12. 2020, Language models are few-shot learners, Advances in neural information processing systems, 33, 1877
  13. 2022, Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 27730
  14. Caron, M. et al. in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision 9650–9660 (2021).
  15. 2020, Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning, Nature, 577, 706, 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Ni, B. , Kaplan, D.L. & Buehler, M.J . Generative design of de novo proteins based on secondary-structure constraints using an attention-based diffusion model. Chem (2023). · DOI
  17. 2022, ProtGPT2 is a deep unsupervised language model for protein design, Nature communications, 13, 4348, 10.1038/s41467-022-32007-7 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.091 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Devlin, J. , Chang, M.-W. , Lee, K. & Toutanova, K . Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018). · arXiv
  20. 2022, AACR Project GENIE: 100,000 cases and beyond, Cancer Discovery, 12, 2044, 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1547 · DOI
  21. 10.1001/jama.1982.03320430047030 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.002 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.023 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1038/s41588-018-0312-8 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Ma, X. , Long, L. , Moon, S. , Adamson, B.J. & Baxi, S.S . Comparison of population characteristics in real-world clinical oncology databases in the US: Flatiron Health, SEER, and NPCR. MedRxiv, 2020.2003. 2016.20037143 (2020). · DOI
  26. Park, J.C. , Ashok, A. , Liu, C. & Kang, H. Real-World Experience of NTRK Fusion– Positive Thyroid Cancer. JCO Precision Oncology 6 (2022). · DOI
  27. 2020, Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective, BMC medical informatics and decision making, 20, 1
  28. 2020, From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees, Nature machine intelligence, 2, 56, 10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Adebayo, J. et al. Sanity checks for saliency maps. Advances in neural information processing systems 31 (2018).
  30. Molnar, C. et al. in xxAI-Beyond Explainable AI: International Workshop, Held in Conjunction with ICML 2020, July 18, 2020, Vienna, Austria, Revised and Extended Papers 39–68 (Springer, 2022). · DOI · Paper page
  31. 2001, Random forests, Machine learning, 45, 5, 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1126/science.aaa1348 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Xie, S. , Chen, D. , Zhang, R. & Xue, H. Deep features analysis with attention networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.10042 (2019). · arXiv
  34. Vashishth, S. , Upadhyay, S. , Tomar, G.S. & Faruqui, M. Attention interpretability across nlp tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.11218 (2019). · arXiv
  35. Vig, J. & Belinkov, Y. Analyzing the structure of attention in a transformer language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.04284 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  36. Jain, S. & Wallace, B.C. Attention is not explanation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.10186 (2019). · arXiv
  37. Rigotti, M. , Miksovic, C. , Giurgiu, I. , Gschwind, T. & Scotton, P. in International Conference on Learning Representations (2022).
  38. Chefer, H. , Gur, S. & Wolf, L. in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 782–791 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  39. 2022, Pre-treatment serum albumin and mutational burden as biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint blockade, npj Precision Oncology, 6, 23, 10.1038/s41698-022-00267-7 · DOI
  40. Rizzo, A. , Ricci, A.D. & Brandi, G . PD-L1, TMB, MSI, and other predictors of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in biliary tract cancer. Cancers 13, 558 (2021). · DOI
  41. 10.1093/annonc/mdz134 · DOI
  42. Palmeri, M. et al. Real-world application of tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-high) and microsatellite instability (MSI) confirms their utility as immunotherapy biomarkers. ESMO open 7, 100336 (2022). · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.06.010 · DOI
  44. 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000706 · DOI
  45. Wohlhieter, C.A. et al. Concurrent mutations in STK11 and KEAP1 promote ferroptosis protection and SCD1 dependence in lung cancer. Cell reports 33, 108444 (2020). · DOI
  46. 10.1038/s41588-018-0200-2 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1126/science.aad0095 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Lan, Z. , et al. in arXiv (2020).
  49. Kojima, T. , Gu, S.S. , Reid, M. , Matsuo, Y. & Iwasawa, Y. Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.11916 (2022). · arXiv
  50. Ethayarajh, K. How contextual are contextualized word representations? comparing the geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 embeddings. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.00512 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  51. McInnes, L. , Healy, J. & Melville, J. Umap: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03426 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1038/nbt.4314 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1016/J.CCELL.2021.04.014 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1038/s41591-019-0654-5 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.028 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Katzman, J.L. et al. DeepSurv: personalized treatment recommender system using a Cox proportional hazards deep neural network. BMC Med Res Methodol 18, 24 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  57. Yousefi, S. et al. Predicting clinical outcomes from large scale cancer genomic profiles with deep survival models. Sci Rep 7, 11707 (2017). · DOI
  58. 2021, Transformer-based deep survival analysis, Proc Mach Learn Res, 146, 132
  59. 2020, Hypothesis-free deep survival learning applied to the tumour microenvironment in gastric cancer, The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research, 6, 273

Metadata

Authors
Arango-Argoty, G., Kipkogei, E., Stewart, R., Patra, A., Kagiampakis, I., & Jacob, E.
Affiliations
  • AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Arango-Argoty, Gustavo
  • Jacob, Etai
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-09-13
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
2101-2101
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408071852
Cited by
34
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2
FWCI
12.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
pre-trained transformer models, tumor response prediction, treatment resistance, survival prediction, biomarkers, self-supervised learning, transfer learning, explainable deep learning, missing data, in silico perturbation, immunotherapy response
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Humans, Immunotherapy, Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review