The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assembly of Protein Complexes In and On the Membrane with Predicted Spatial Arrangement Constraints
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168486 · Paper page
Abstract
Membrane proteins play crucial roles in various cellular processes, and their interactions with other proteins in and on the membrane are essential for their proper functioning. While an increasing number of structures of more membrane proteins are being determined, the available structure data is still sparse. To gain insights into the mechanisms of membrane protein complexes, computational docking methods are necessary due to the challenge of experimental determination. Here, we introduce Mem-LZerD, a rigid-body membrane docking algorithm designed to take advantage of modern membrane modeling and protein docking techniques to facilitate the docking of membrane protein complexes. Mem-LZerD is based on the LZerD protein docking algorithm, which has been constantly among the top servers in many rounds of CAPRI protein docking assessment. By employing a combination of geometric hashing, newly constrained by the predicted membrane height and tilt angle, and model scoring accounting for the energy of membrane insertion, we demonstrate the capability of Mem-LZerD to model diverse membrane protein-protein complexes. Mem-LZerD successfully performed unbound docking on 13 of 21 (61.9%) transmembrane complexes in an established benchmark, more than shown by previous approaches. It was additionally tested on new datasets of 44 transmembrane complexes and 92 peripheral membrane protein complexes, of which it successfully modeled 35 (79.5%) and 15 (16.3%) complexes respectively. When non-blind orientations of peripheral targets were included, the number of successes increased to 54 (58.7%). We further demonstrate that Mem-LZerD produces complex models which are suitable for molecular dynamics simulation. Mem-LZerD is made available at https://lzerd.kiharalab.org .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 73
- 10.1107/S0907444902003451 · DOI
- 10.1038/nsb1203-980 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Cryo-Electron Microscopy Reaches Resolution Milestone, ACS Cent Sci, 6, 1274, 10.1021/acscentsci.0c01048 · DOI
- 2020, Computational structure modeling for diverse categories of macromolecular interactions, Curr Opin Struct Biol, 64, 1, 10.1016/j.sbi.2020.05.017 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.21502 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja026939x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nprot.2016.169 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkn216 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq444 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt038 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.24400 · DOI
- Evans R. , O’Neill M. , Pritzel A. , Antropova N. , Senior A. , Green T. , et al. (2021). Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioRxiv. 2021.10.04.463034. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1471-2105-10-407 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.25850 · DOI
- 2021, LZerD webserver for pairwise and multiple protein-protein docking, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, W359, 10.1093/nar/gkab336 · DOI
- 2021, LZerD Protein-Protein Docking Webserver Enhanced With de novo Structure Prediction, Front Mol Biosci., 8, 724947, 10.3389/fmolb.2021.724947 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.25870 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.25838 · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, A Membrane Protein Complex Docking Benchmark, J Mol Biol, 430, 5246, 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.11.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Prediction of protein assemblies, the next frontier: The CASP14-CAPRI experiment, Proteins, 89, 1800, 10.1002/prot.26222 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.288.5470.1390 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.061 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00595-0 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008818 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006325 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.01.022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-022-29394-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-021-27449-4 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004398 · DOI
- 2021, Memdock: An alpha-Helical Membrane Protein Docking Algorithm, Methods Mol Biol, 2315, 111, 10.1007/978-1-0716-1468-6_7 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw184 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Transmembrane Protein Docking with JabberDock, J Chem Inf Model, 61, 1493, 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01315 · DOI
- 2022, Domain-Based Protein Docking with Extremely Large Conformational Changes, J Mol Biol, 434, 167820, 10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167820 · DOI
- Christoffer C. , Kihara D . (2022). Modeling protein-nucleic acid complexes with extremely large conformational changes using Flex-LZerD. Proteomics. e 2200322. · DOI
- 2017, Modeling disordered protein interactions from biophysical principles, PLoS Comput Biol, 13, e1005485, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005485 · DOI
- 10.1109/99.641604 · DOI
- 2022, Real-time structure search and structure classification for AlphaFold protein models, Commun Biol, 5, 316, 10.1038/s42003-022-03261-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00163 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12859-015-0580-6 · DOI
- 2014, 3D-SURFER 2.0: web platform for real-time search and characterization of protein surfaces, Methods Mol Biol, 1137, 105, 10.1007/978-1-4939-0366-5_8 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp542 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.4219 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkr703 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00935 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.25419 · DOI
- 2017, Modeling protein-protein and protein-peptide complexes: CAPRI 6th edition, Proteins, 85, 359, 10.1002/prot.25215 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1150755 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80675-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41594-021-00605-6 · DOI
- 10.1038/83817 · DOI
- 2014, Expanding the clinical phenotype associated with ELOVL4 mutation: study of a large French-Canadian family with autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxia and erythrokeratodermia, JAMA Neurol, 71, 470, 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.6337 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.07.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00619-8 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.273.16.9886 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M110.162982 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M501489200 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M305481200 · DOI
- 10.1038/384644a0 · DOI
- 10.1194/jlr.M600486-JLR200 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi9927235 · DOI
- 10.1038/362814a0 · DOI
- 2018, Clustering huge protein sequence sets in linear time, Nat Commun, 9, 2542, 10.1038/s41467-018-04964-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkp318 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4939-0366-5_15 · DOI
- 1998, An optimal algorithm for approximate nearest neighbor searching fixed dimensions, J ACM, 45, 891, 10.1145/293347.293348 · DOI
- 1996, Bagging predictors, Machine Learning, 24, 123, 10.1007/BF00058655 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.09.012 · DOI
- 10.1110/ps.0217002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.23086 · DOI
- 2017, Human and server docking prediction for CAPRI round 30-35 using LZerD with combined scoring functions, Proteins, 85, 513, 10.1002/prot.25165 · DOI
- 2018, Improved performance in CAPRI round 37 using LZerD docking and template-based modeling with combined scoring functions, Proteins, 86, 311
- 10.1085/jgp.200709745 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Christoffer, C., Harini, K., Archit, G., & Kihara, D.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Kihara, Daisuke
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-10-23
- Volume
- 436
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 168486-168486
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10942765
- OpenAlex
- W4391649588
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Biology (acceptedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1925643, 2137603, 2003635, 2138259, 2138296, 2138307, 2151678, 2138286, 2146026)
- National Sleep Foundation
- Purdue University (2138296, 21-38307, 2138286, 21-37603, CIS230021, 21-38259)
- National Institutes of Health (2138307, 2138286, 2138296, 2137603, 2138259)
- Science and Engineering Research Board
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM132024, R01GM123055, R01GM133840, T32GM132024)
- Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (#2138286, #2138296, 2138259, #2138307, 2137603)
- Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (CMMI1825941)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- membrane protein complexes, membrane protein-protein interactions, rigid-body docking, peripheral membrane proteins, geometric hashing, molecular dynamics simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review