PreprintCited by 44Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SPIRED-Fitness: an end-to-end framework for the prediction of protein structure and fitness from single sequence

Open access
Chen, Yinghui, Xu, Yunxin, Liu, Di, Xing, Yaoguang, Gong, Haipeng·2024·Nature Communications

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-024-51776-x · Paper page

Abstract

A bstract: Significant research progress has been made in the field of protein structure and fitness prediction. Particularly, single-sequence-based structure prediction methods like ESMFold and OmegaFold achieve a balance between inference speed and prediction accuracy, showing promise for many downstream prediction tasks. Here, we propose SPIRED, a novel single-sequence-based structure prediction model that exhibits comparable performance to the state-of-the-art methods but with approximately 5-fold acceleration in inference and at least one order of magnitude reduction in training consumption. By integrating SPIRED with downstream neural networks, we compose an end-to-end framework named SPIRED-Fitness for the rapid prediction of both protein structure and fitness from single sequence. SPIRED-Fitness and its derivative SPIRED-Stab achieve state-of-the-art performance in predicting the mutational effects on protein fitness and stability metrics, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.01.31.578102

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. 10.1126/science.181.4096.223 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1073/pnas.1111471108 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/nbt.2419 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/nrg3414 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Rao, R. , Liu, J. , Verkuil, R. , et al. MSA Transformer. bioRxiv. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.12.430858v1 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Baek, M. , DiMaio, F. , Anishchenko, I. , et al. Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network. Science 373, 871–876. eprint: https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abj8754. https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.abj8754 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Lin, Z. , Akin, H. , Rao, R. , et al. Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model. Science 379, 1123–1130. eprint: https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.ade2574. https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.ade2574 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Wu, R. , Ding, F. , Wang, R. , et al. High-resolution de novo structure prediction from primary sequence. bioRxiv. eprint: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/22/2022.07.21.500999.full.pdf. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/22/2022.07.21.500999 (2022).
  10. 10.1038/s42256-023-00721-6 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/s43588-022-00373-3 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/s41587-022-01432-w · DOI · Paper page
  13. Mansoor, S. , Baek, M. , Juergens, D. , et al. Zero-shot mutation effect prediction on protein stability and function using RoseTTAFold. Protein Science 32 (2023). · DOI
  14. 10.1038/nrm2805 · DOI
  15. 10.1186/s13321-023-00688-x · DOI
  16. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008543 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/nar/gkad472 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/s41392-023-01381-z · DOI
  21. Xu, Y. , Liu, D. & Gong, H. Improving the prediction of protein stability changes upon mutations by geometric learning and a pre-training strategy. bioRxiv. eprint: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2023/05/30/2023.05.28.542668.full.pdf. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2023/05/30/2023.05.28.542668 (2023).
  22. 10.1002/prot.25431 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1002/prot.26213 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/prot.26545 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/nmeth.3027 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Ahdritz, G. , Bouatta, N. , Floristean, C. , et al. OpenFold: Retraining AlphaFold2 yields new insights into its learning mechanisms and capacity for generalization. bioRxiv. eprint: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2022/11/22/2022.11.20.517210.full.pdf. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.11.20.517210 (2022). · DOI
  28. 10.1038/s42256-019-0130-4 · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Meier, J. , Rao, R. , Verkuil, R. , et al. Language models enable zero-shot prediction of the effects of mutations on protein function. bioRxiv. eprint: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/10/2021.07.09.450648.full.pdf. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/10/2021.07.09.450648 (2021).
  31. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1079 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization 2017. arXiv: 1412.6980 [cs.LG]. · arXiv
  34. 10.1093/nar/gkab1054 · DOI
  35. 2023, Mega-scale experimental analysis of protein folding stability in biology and design, Nature, 620, 434, 10.1038/s41586-023-06328-6 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1186/s13059-019-1845-6 · DOI
  37. 10.1101/2021.11.29.470445 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/s41592-018-0138-4 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Blondel, M. , Teboul, O. , Berthet, Q. , et al. Fast Differentiable Sorting and Ranking in INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 119 (eds Daume, H. & Singh, A. ) 119. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), ELECTR NETWORK, JUL 13-18, 2020 (2020).
  40. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1035 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/nar/gkaa925 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1093/bib/bbab555 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad011 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/prot.20264 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Luo, Y. , Jiang, G. , Yu, T. , et al. ECNet is an evolutionary context-integrated deep learning framework for protein engineering. Nature Communications 12 (2021). · DOI
  47. 10.1126/science.abn2100 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1101/2022.11.04.515218 · DOI
  49. 10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Ouyang-Zhang, J. , Diaz, D. J. , Klivans, A. , et al. Predicting a Protein’s Stability under a Million Mutations. NeurIPS (2023).
  51. 10.1093/nar/gkr363 · DOI
  52. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008291 · DOI
  53. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt691 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1093/nar/gky300 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1002/pro.3942 · DOI
  56. 10.1093/nar/gki375 · DOI
  57. 10.1186/s12859-015-0548-6 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/nar/gku411 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1088/1361-6463/abedfb · DOI
  60. 10.1093/nar/gki387 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-1 · DOI
  62. 10.1186/s12859-019-2923-1 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv291 · DOI
  64. 10.1002/prot.20810 · DOI
  65. 10.3390/ijms22020606 · DOI
  66. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn353 · DOI
  67. 10.1155/2014/278385 · DOI
  68. 10.1038/srep23257 · DOI
  69. Paszke, A. , Gross, S. , Massa, F. , et al. in Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, 2019).

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Y., Xu, Y., Liu, D., Xing, Y., & Gong, H.
Affiliations
Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
Gong, Haipeng
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-02-02
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
7400-7400
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401900858
Cited by
44
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 3
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32171243)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2023YFF1204400)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
protein structure prediction, protein fitness prediction, end-to-end framework, inference acceleration, protein engineering, ESMFold
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Protein Stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review