The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comprehensive detection and characterization of human druggable pockets through novel binding site descriptors
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-024-52146-3
Abstract
Druggable pockets are protein regions that have the ability to bind organic small molecules, and their characterization is essential in target-based drug discovery. However, strategies to derive pocket descriptors are scarce and usually exhibit limited applicability. Here, we present PocketVec, a novel approach to generate pocket descriptors for any protein binding site of interest through the inverse virtual screening of lead-like molecules. We assess the performance of our descriptors in a variety of scenarios, showing that it is on par with the best available methodologies, while overcoming some important limitations. In parallel, we systematically search for druggable pockets in the folded human proteome, using experimentally determined protein structures and AlphaFold2 models, identifying over 32,000 binding sites in more than 20,000 protein domains. Finally, we derive PocketVec descriptors for each small molecule binding site and run an all-against-all similarity search, exploring over 1.2 billion pairwise comparisons. We show how PocketVec descriptors facilitate the identification of druggable pocket similarities not revealed by structure- or sequence-based comparisons. Indeed, our analyses unveil dense clusters of similar pockets in distinct proteins for which no inhibitor has yet been crystalized, opening the door to strategies to prioritize the development of chemical probes to cover the druggable space.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 91
- 10.1038/s41586-023-05905-z · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.3730 · DOI
- 2019, A Structure-Based Drug Discovery Paradigm, IJMS, 20, 2783, 10.3390/ijms20112783 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2017.10.010 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12272-015-0640-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrd1549 · DOI
- 2015, Virtual screening: an in silico tool for interlacing the chemical universe with the proteome, Methods, 71, 44, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.08.001 · DOI
- 2016, Using reverse docking for target identification and its applications for drug discovery, Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, 11, 707, 10.1080/17460441.2016.1190706 · DOI
- 2019, Molecular Docking: Shifting Paradigms in Drug Discovery, IJMS, 20, 4331, 10.3390/ijms20184331 · DOI
- 2019, An Overview of Scoring Functions Used for Protein–Ligand Interactions in Molecular Docking, Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci, 11, 320, 10.1007/s12539-019-00327-w · DOI
- Shen, C. et al. From machine learning to deep learning: Advances in scoring functions for protein– ligand docking. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 10 (2020). · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00832 · DOI
- 2022, Connecting chemistry and biology through molecular descriptors, Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 66, 102090, 10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.09.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.08.005 · DOI
- 2016, An overview of molecular fingerprint similarity search in virtual screening, Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, 11, 137, 10.1517/17460441.2016.1117070 · DOI
- 2022, Using deep learning to annotate the protein universe, Nat Biotechnol, 40, 932, 10.1038/s41587-021-01179-w · DOI · Paper page
- Eguida, M. & Rognan, D . Estimating the Similarity between Protein Pockets. Int J Mol Sci 23 (2022). · DOI
- 10.1021/ci900349y · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.21858 · DOI
- 2020, Deciphering interaction fingerprints from protein molecular surfaces using geometric deep learning, Nat Methods, 17, 184, 10.1038/s41592-019-0666-6 · DOI
- 10.1021/ci3000776 · DOI
- 10.1021/ci300566n · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.24753 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.039 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00554 · DOI
- 2022, Classification of Protein-Binding Sites Using a Spherical Convolutional Neural Network, J. Chem. Inf. Model, 62, 5383, 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00832 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1359-6446(04)03163-0 · DOI
- 2019, Binding site comparisons for target-centered drug discovery, Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, 14, 445, 10.1080/17460441.2019.1588883 · DOI
- 2019, Binding site matching in rational drug design: algorithms and applications, Briefings in Bioinformatics, 20, 2167, 10.1093/bib/bby078 · DOI
- 2017, Computational Multitarget Drug Design, J. Chem. Inf. Model, 57, 403, 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00491 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0065894 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.11.012 · DOI
- 2017, Detecting similar binding pockets to enable systems polypharmacology, PLoS Comput Biol, 13, e1005522, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005522 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00078 · DOI
- 2013, Identification of Similar Binding Sites to Detect Distant Polypharmacology, Mol. Inf, 32, 976, 10.1002/minf.201300082 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.05.006 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b02041 · DOI
- 2013, Identification of Distant Drug Off-Targets by Direct Superposition of Binding Pocket Surfaces, PLoS ONE, 8, e83533, 10.1371/journal.pone.0083533 · DOI
- 2019, Proteochemometrics – recent developments in bioactivity and selectivity modeling, Drug Discovery Today: Technologies, 32-33, 89, 10.1016/j.ddtec.2020.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Machine learning models for drug–target interactions: current knowledge and future directions, Drug Discovery Today, 25, 748, 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.03.003 · DOI
- 2018, A benchmark driven guide to binding site comparison: An exhaustive evaluation using tailor-made data sets (ProSPECCTs), PLoS Comput Biol, 14, e1006483, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006483 · DOI
- 2021, Artificial intelligence in drug discovery: recent advances and future perspectives, Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, 16, 949, 10.1080/17460441.2021.1909567 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41573-019-0024-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome, Nature, 596, 590, 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167336 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature03193 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, One molecular fingerprint to rule them all: drugs, biomolecules, and the metabolome, J Cheminform, 12, 43, 10.1186/s13321-020-00445-4 · DOI
- 2018, Comparative assessment of strategies to identify similar ligand-binding pockets in proteins, BMC Bioinformatics, 19, 91, 10.1186/s12859-018-2109-2 · DOI
- Schmidt, D. et al. Analyzing Kinase Similarity in Small Molecule and Protein Structural Space to Explore the Limits of Multi-Target Screening. Molecules 26 (2021). · DOI
- 2019, DeepDrug3D: Classification of ligand-binding pockets in proteins with a convolutional neural network, PLoS Comput. Biol, 15, e1006718, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006718 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707308 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt1284 · DOI · Paper page
- 2023, Illuminating the Chemical Space of Untargeted Proteins, J Chem Inf Model, 63, 2689, 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01364 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003302 · DOI
- 10.1021/jm0306430 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/jm030644s · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003571 · DOI
- 10.1021/ci300604z · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-020-0564-6 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-24150-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Integrating and formatting biomedical data as pre-calculated knowledge graph embeddings in the Bioteque, Nat Commun, 13, 5304, 10.1038/s41467-022-33026-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAC1052 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAA913 · DOI · Paper page
- Lyu, J. , et al. AlphaFold2 structures template ligand discovery. bioRxiv (2023). · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-10-168 · DOI
- 2018, P2Rank: machine learning based tool for rapid and accurate prediction of ligand binding sites from protein structure, J Cheminform, 10, 39, 10.1186/s13321-018-0285-8 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41573-021-00252-y · DOI
- 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106552 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt1358 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.1990 · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, What Makes a Kinase Promiscuous for Inhibitors?, Cell Chem Biol, 26, 390, 10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.11.005 · DOI
- Reinecke, M. et al. Chemical proteomics reveals the target landscape of 1,000 kinase inhibitors. Nat Chem Biol (2023). · DOI
- 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.06.020 · DOI
- 2017, Detecting similar binding pockets to enable systems polypharmacology, PLoS Comput Biol, 13, e1005522, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005522 · DOI
- Jin, W. , Barzilay, R. & Jaakkola, T.S. Hierarchical Generation of Molecular Graphs using Structural Motifs. arXiv (2020).
- 10.1021/acs.jcim · DOI
- 10.1007/s10822-013-9672–4. · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, AI in small-molecule drug discovery: a coming wave?, Nat Rev Drug Discov, 21, 175, 10.1038/d41573-022-00025-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, BioExcel Building Blocks, a software library for interoperable biomolecular simulation workflows, Sci Data, 6, 169, 10.1038/s41597-019-0177-4 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2401 · DOI
- 10.1186/1758-2946-3-33 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.01.086 · DOI
- 2015, The Recognition of Identical Ligands by Unrelated Proteins, ACS Chem. Biol, 10, 2772, 10.1021/acschembio.5b00683 · DOI
- 2022, localpdb-a Python package to manage protein structures and their annotations, Bioinformatics, 38, 2633, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac121 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkw1072 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Comajuncosa-Creus, A., Jorba, G., Barril, X., & Aloy, P.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Research in Biomedicine (ES)
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Aloy, Patrick
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-03-16
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7917-7917
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11387482
- OpenAlex
- W4402409899
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 6.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (PID2020-119535RB-I00, PID2020)
- Centres de Recerca de Catalunya
- European Commission (101003633)
- Generalitat de Catalunya (001-P-001682, 2021 SGR 00876, 001-P-001647)
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2020)
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Keywords
- druggable pockets, protein binding sites, human proteome, target-based drug discovery, protein-ligand binding
- MeSH terms
- Binding Sites, Humans, Ligands, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Proteins, Proteome, Drug Discovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review