PreprintCited by 0Genomics and Rare DiseasesProtein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AFFIPred: AlphaFold2 Structure-based Functional Impact Prediction of Missense Variations

Open access
Pir, Mustafa Samet, Timucin, Emel·2024·Protein Science

Preprint — published as 10.1002/pro.70030 · Paper page

Abstract

Structural information holds immense potential for pathogenicity prediction of missense variations, albeit structure-based pathogenicity classifiers are limited compared to their sequence-based counterparts due to the well-known gap between sequence and structure data. Leveraging the highly accurate protein structure prediction method, AlphaFold2 (AF2), we introduce AFFIPred, an ensemble machine learning classifier that combines established sequence and AF2-based structural characteristics to predict disease-causing missense variant pathogenicity. Based on the assessments on unseen datasets, AFFIPred reached a comparable level of performance with the state-of-the-art predictors such as AlphaMissense and Rhapsody. We also showed that the recruitment of AF2 structures that are full-length and represent the unbound states ensures more precise SASA calculations compared to the recruitment of experimental structures. Second, in line with the the completeness of the AF2 structures, their use provide a more comprehensive view of the structural characteristics of the missense variation datasets by capturing all variants. AFFIPred maintains high-level accuracy without the well-known limitations of structure-based pathogenicity classifiers, paving the way for the development of more sophisticated structure-based methods without PDB dependence. AFFIPred has predicted over 210 million variations of the human proteome, which are accessible at https://affipred.timucinlab.com/ .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.05.13.593840

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 2017, Context-aware prediction of pathogenicity of missense mutations involved in human disease, arXiv preprint
  2. 10.1038/nbt.3769 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2010, A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations, Nature methods, 7, 248, 10.1038/nmeth0410-248 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2018, Prediction and interpretation of deleterious coding variants in terms of protein structural stability, Scientific reports, 8, 4480, 10.1038/s41598-018-22531-2 · DOI
  5. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-1 · DOI
  6. 2020, Rhapsody: predicting the pathogenicity of human missense variants, Bioinformatics, 36, 3084, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa127 · DOI
  7. 2023, Predicting the pathogenicity of missense variants using features derived from AlphaFold2, Bioinformatics, 39, btad280, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad280 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2018, Structural dynamics is a determinant of the functional significance of missense variants, Biophysical Journal, 114, 232a, 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.1291 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/bib/bbz146 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00813-6 · DOI
  11. 2017, Role of structural bioinformatics in drug discovery by computational SNP analysis: analyzing variation at the protein level, Global heart, 12, 151, 10.1016/j.gheart.2017.01.009 · DOI
  12. 2017, Structure-based analysis of single nucleotide variants in the renin-angiotensinogen complex, Global Heart, 12, 121, 10.1016/j.gheart.2017.01.006 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167180 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.08.004 · DOI
  15. 2020, High accuracy protein structure prediction using deep learning, Fourteenth critical assessment of techniques for protein structure prediction (abstract book), 22, 2
  16. 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 2021, Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome, Nature, 596, 590, 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1002/pmic.202200128 · DOI
  20. Peng K , Obradovic Z , Vucetic S. Exploring bias in the Protein Data Bank using contrast classifiers. In: Biocomputing 2004. World Scientific; 2003. p. 435–446. · DOI
  21. 2018, Gene annotation bias impedes biomedical research, Scientific reports, 8, 1362, 10.1038/s41598-018-19333-x · DOI · Paper page
  22. 2023, Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense, Science, 381, eadg7492, 10.1126/science.adg7492 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1093/nar/gkx1153 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1093/nar/gky1049 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1093/nar/gkf493 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/protein/12.5.387 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90570-1 · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10915 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 1994, Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 20, 216, 10.1002/prot.340200303 · DOI
  31. 10.1371/journal.pone.0080635 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90038-6 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Chen T , Guestrin C. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining; 2016. p. 785–794. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Bergstra J , Yamins D , Cox D. Making a science of model search: Hyperparameter optimization in hundreds of dimensions for vision architectures. In: International conference on machine learning. PMLR; 2013. p. 115–123.
  36. 10.1093/nar/gkq603 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/s41587-022-01316-z · DOI
  38. 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006643 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1038/470163a · DOI · Paper page
  40. 2015, Missing strings of residues in protein crystal structures, Intrinsically disordered proteins, 3, e1095697, 10.1080/21690707.2015.1095697 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 2014, Cross-validation pitfalls when selecting and assessing regression and classification models, Journal of cheminformatics, 6, 1
  43. 10.1002/humu.22768 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Zhou Y , Tremmel R , Schaeffeler E , Schwab M , Lauschke VM . Challenges and opportunities associated with rare-variant pharmacogenomics. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2022;. · DOI
  45. Sundararajan M , Najmi A. The many Shapley values for model explanation. In: International conference on machine learning. PMLR; 2020. p. 9269–9278.
  46. 2013, Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2, Current protocols in human genetics, 76, 7
  47. 2023, Evaluation of AlphaFold structure-based protein stability prediction on missense variations in cancer, Frontiers in Genetics, 14, 1052383, 10.3389/fgene.2023.1052383 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.08.005 · DOI
  49. 10.1186/s12864-020-6490-7 · DOI
  50. 2020, On the performance of Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) for imbalanced dataset, Pattern Recognition Letters, 136, 71, 10.1016/j.patrec.2020.03.030 · DOI
  51. 2021, PTP-MEG2 regulates quantal size and fusion pore opening through two distinct structural bases and substrates, EMBO reports, 22, e52141, 10.15252/embr.202052141 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/386569a0 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1021/bi0602718 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1002/humu.21656 · DOI
  55. 10.1002/pro.3667 · DOI
  56. 2018, Proteome-wide comparison between the amino acid composition of domains and linkers, BMC research notes, 11, 1

Metadata

Authors
Pir, M. S., & Timucin, E.
Affiliations
Acıbadem University (TR)
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-05-15
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
e70030-e70030
ISSN
0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406702706
Cited by
0
References
2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
AlphaFold2, protein structure-based prediction, solvent accessibility, protein structure prediction, human proteome, functional impact prediction
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Computational Biology, Mutation, Missense, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AFFIPred: AlphaFold2 Structure-based Functional Impact Prediction of Missense Variations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/2024.05.13.593840
The paper
Pir, M. S., & Timucin, E. (2024). AFFIPred: AlphaFold2 Structure-based Functional Impact Prediction of Missense Variations. Protein Science. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.13.593840