The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Single-sequence protein-RNA complex structure prediction by geometric attention-enabled pairing of biological language models
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.cels.2025.101400
Abstract
Ground-breaking progress has been made in structure prediction of biomolecular assemblies, including the recent breakthrough of AlphaFold 3. However, it remains challenging for AlphaFold 3 and other state-of-the-art deep learning-based methods to accurately predict protein-RNA complex structures, in part due to the limited availability of evolutionary and structural information related to protein-RNA interactions that are used as inputs to the existing approaches. Here, we introduce ProRNA3D-single, a new deep-learning framework for protein-RNA complex structure prediction with only single-sequence input. Using a novel geometric attention-enabled pairing of biological language models of protein and RNA, a previously unexplored avenue, ProRNA3D-single enables the prediction of interatomic protein-RNA interaction maps, which are then transformed into multi-scale geometric restraints for modeling 3D structures of protein-RNA complexes via geometry optimization. Benchmark tests show that ProRNA3D-single convincingly outperforms current state-of-the-art methods including AlphaFold 3, particularly when evolutionary information is limited; and exhibits remarkable robustness and performance resilience by attaining better accuracy with only single-sequence input than what most methods can achieve even with explicit evolutionary information. Freely available at https://github.com/Bhattacharya-Lab/ProRNA3D-single , ProRNA3D-single should be broadly useful for modeling 3D structures of protein-RNA complexes at scale, regardless of the availability of evolutionary information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families
Madani, A., Krause, B., Greene, E. R., Subramanian, S., Mohr, B. P., Holton, J. M., Olmos, J. L., Xiong, C., Sun, Z. Z., Socher, R., et al. (2023) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01618-2 · Cited by 1,078
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 56
- 10.1038/nrg3813 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrg2673 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0906940106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/cshperspect.a003681 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0959-440X(99)80009-8 · DOI
- 2011, Seminars in cell & developmental biology, Elsevier, 22, 359
- 10.1016/j.tig.2008.05.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mcn.2013.04.002 · DOI
- 2010, iCLIP reveals the function of hnRNP particles in splicing at individual nucleotide resolution, Nature structural & molecular biology, 17, 909, 10.1038/nsmb.1838 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ymeth.2004.03.027 · DOI
- 2016, Template-based modeling of protein-RNA interactions, PLoS computational biology, 12, e1005120, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005120 · DOI
- 2020, P3DOCK: a protein–RNA docking webserver based on template-based and template-free docking, Bioinformatics, 36, 96, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz478 · DOI
- 2018, Protein-RNA docking using ICM, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 14, 4971, 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00293 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkv493 · DOI
- 2013, A novel protocol for three-dimensional structure prediction of RNA-protein complexes, Scientific reports, 3, 1887, 10.1038/srep01887 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkr636 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkx407 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- 2024, Accurate prediction of protein–nucleic acid complexes using RoseTTAFoldNA, Nature Methods, 21, 117, 10.1038/s41592-023-02086-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/sci-ence.adl2528 · DOI
- Abramson, J. , Adler, J. , Dunger, J. , Evans, R. , Green, T. , Pritzel, A. , Ronneberger, O. , Willmore, L. , Ballard, A.J. , Bambrick, J. et al. (2024) Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.029 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, ProteinBERT: a universal deep-learning model of protein sequence and function, Bioinformatics, 38, 2102, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac020 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, ProtGPT2 is a deep unsupervised language model for protein design, Nature communications, 13, 4348, 10.1038/s41467-022-32007-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Single-sequence protein structure prediction using a language model and deep learning, Nature Biotechnology, 40, 1617, 10.1038/s41587-022-01432-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
- Vaswani, A. , Shazeer, N. , Parmar, N. , Uszkoreit, J. , Jones, L. , Gomez, A.N. , Kaiser, Ł. and Polosukhin, I. (2017) Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
- 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04943 · DOI
- 2022, E2Efold-3D: end-to-end deep learning method for accurate de novo RNA 3D structure prediction, arXiv preprint
- 10.48550/arXiv.2204.00300 · DOI
- 2023, E (3) equivariant graph neural networks for robust and accurate protein-protein interaction site prediction, PLoS Computational Biology, 19, e1011435, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011435 · DOI
- 2024, EquiPNAS: improved protein–nucleic acid binding site prediction using protein-language-model-informed equivariant deep graph neural networks, Nucleic Acids Research, 52, e27, 10.1093/nar/gkae039 · DOI · Paper page
- 2023, trRosettaRNA: automated prediction of RNA 3D structure with transformer network, Nature Communications, 14, 7266, 10.1038/s41467-023-42528-4 · DOI
- 2021, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, 139, 9323
- Si, Y. and Yan, C. (2021) Improved protein contact prediction using dimensional hybrid residual networks and singularity enhanced loss function. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22. · DOI
- 2023, Protein–protein contact prediction by geometric triangle-aware protein language models, Nature Machine Intelligence, 5, 1275, 10.1038/s42256-023-00741-2 · DOI
- Xu, J. , Li, Z. , Du, B. , Zhang, M. and Liu, J. (2020), 2020 IEEE Symposium on Computers and communications (ISCC). IEEE, pp. 1–7.
- 10.48550/arXiv.1912.01703 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.48550/arXiv.1608.03983 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq007 · DOI
- 2021, Hybridized distance-and contact-based hierarchical structure modeling for folding soluble and membrane proteins, PLOS Computational Biology, 17, e1008753, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008753 · DOI
- 2022, DisCovER: distance-and orientation-based covariational threading for weakly homologous proteins, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 90, 579, 10.1002/prot.26254 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1115898108 · DOI
- 2023, Evaluating native-like structures of RNA-protein complexes through the deep learning method, Nature Communications, 14, 1060, 10.1038/s41467-023-36720-9 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkq1266 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq003 · DOI
- 2017, Modeling protein–protein and protein– peptide complexes: CAPRI 6th edition, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 85, 359, 10.1002/prot.25215 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0161879 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gku077 · DOI
- 2022, Crystal structure of a pre-chemistry viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase suggests participation of two basic residues in catalysis, Nucleic Acids Research, 50, 12389, 10.1093/nar/gkac1133 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Roche, R., Tarafder, S., & Bhattacharya, D.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bhattacharya, Debswapna
- Venue
- Cell Systems
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-07-28
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 101400-101400
- ISSN
- 2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11291176
- OpenAlex
- W4414303254
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cell Systems (acceptedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2208679)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM138146)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- geometry optimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review