PreprintCited by 4Protein Structure and DynamicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Single-sequence protein-RNA complex structure prediction by geometric attention-enabled pairing of biological language models

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.cels.2025.101400

Abstract

Ground-breaking progress has been made in structure prediction of biomolecular assemblies, including the recent breakthrough of AlphaFold 3. However, it remains challenging for AlphaFold 3 and other state-of-the-art deep learning-based methods to accurately predict protein-RNA complex structures, in part due to the limited availability of evolutionary and structural information related to protein-RNA interactions that are used as inputs to the existing approaches. Here, we introduce ProRNA3D-single, a new deep-learning framework for protein-RNA complex structure prediction with only single-sequence input. Using a novel geometric attention-enabled pairing of biological language models of protein and RNA, a previously unexplored avenue, ProRNA3D-single enables the prediction of interatomic protein-RNA interaction maps, which are then transformed into multi-scale geometric restraints for modeling 3D structures of protein-RNA complexes via geometry optimization. Benchmark tests show that ProRNA3D-single convincingly outperforms current state-of-the-art methods including AlphaFold 3, particularly when evolutionary information is limited; and exhibits remarkable robustness and performance resilience by attaining better accuracy with only single-sequence input than what most methods can achieve even with explicit evolutionary information. Freely available at https://github.com/Bhattacharya-Lab/ProRNA3D-single , ProRNA3D-single should be broadly useful for modeling 3D structures of protein-RNA complexes at scale, regardless of the availability of evolutionary information.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.07.27.605468

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.1038/nrg3813 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/nrg2673 · DOI
  4. 10.1073/pnas.0906940106 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1101/cshperspect.a003681 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/S0959-440X(99)80009-8 · DOI
  7. 2011, Seminars in cell & developmental biology, Elsevier, 22, 359
  8. 10.1016/j.tig.2008.05.004 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.011 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.mcn.2013.04.002 · DOI
  11. 2010, iCLIP reveals the function of hnRNP particles in splicing at individual nucleotide resolution, Nature structural & molecular biology, 17, 909, 10.1038/nsmb.1838 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2004.03.027 · DOI
  13. 2016, Template-based modeling of protein-RNA interactions, PLoS computational biology, 12, e1005120, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005120 · DOI
  14. 2020, P3DOCK: a protein–RNA docking webserver based on template-based and template-free docking, Bioinformatics, 36, 96, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz478 · DOI
  15. 2018, Protein-RNA docking using ICM, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 14, 4971, 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00293 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/nar/gkv493 · DOI
  17. 2013, A novel protocol for three-dimensional structure prediction of RNA-protein complexes, Scientific reports, 3, 1887, 10.1038/srep01887 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/nar/gkr636 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/nar/gkx407 · DOI
  20. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 2024, Accurate prediction of protein–nucleic acid complexes using RoseTTAFoldNA, Nature Methods, 21, 117, 10.1038/s41592-023-02086-5 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1126/sci-ence.adl2528 · DOI
  23. Abramson, J. , Adler, J. , Dunger, J. , Evans, R. , Green, T. , Pritzel, A. , Ronneberger, O. , Willmore, L. , Ballard, A.J. , Bambrick, J. et al. (2024) Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature. · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.029 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 2022, ProteinBERT: a universal deep-learning model of protein sequence and function, Bioinformatics, 38, 2102, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac020 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 2022, ProtGPT2 is a deep unsupervised language model for protein design, Nature communications, 13, 4348, 10.1038/s41467-022-32007-7 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 2022, Single-sequence protein structure prediction using a language model and deep learning, Nature Biotechnology, 40, 1617, 10.1038/s41587-022-01432-w · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Vaswani, A. , Shazeer, N. , Parmar, N. , Uszkoreit, J. , Jones, L. , Gomez, A.N. , Kaiser, Ł. and Polosukhin, I. (2017) Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
  33. 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04943 · DOI
  34. 2022, E2Efold-3D: end-to-end deep learning method for accurate de novo RNA 3D structure prediction, arXiv preprint
  35. 10.48550/arXiv.2204.00300 · DOI
  36. 2023, E (3) equivariant graph neural networks for robust and accurate protein-protein interaction site prediction, PLoS Computational Biology, 19, e1011435, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011435 · DOI
  37. 2024, EquiPNAS: improved protein–nucleic acid binding site prediction using protein-language-model-informed equivariant deep graph neural networks, Nucleic Acids Research, 52, e27, 10.1093/nar/gkae039 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 2023, trRosettaRNA: automated prediction of RNA 3D structure with transformer network, Nature Communications, 14, 7266, 10.1038/s41467-023-42528-4 · DOI
  39. 2021, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, 139, 9323
  40. Si, Y. and Yan, C. (2021) Improved protein contact prediction using dimensional hybrid residual networks and singularity enhanced loss function. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22. · DOI
  41. 2023, Protein–protein contact prediction by geometric triangle-aware protein language models, Nature Machine Intelligence, 5, 1275, 10.1038/s42256-023-00741-2 · DOI
  42. Xu, J. , Li, Z. , Du, B. , Zhang, M. and Liu, J. (2020), 2020 IEEE Symposium on Computers and communications (ISCC). IEEE, pp. 1–7.
  43. 10.48550/arXiv.1912.01703 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.48550/arXiv.1608.03983 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq007 · DOI
  47. 2021, Hybridized distance-and contact-based hierarchical structure modeling for folding soluble and membrane proteins, PLOS Computational Biology, 17, e1008753, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008753 · DOI
  48. 2022, DisCovER: distance-and orientation-based covariational threading for weakly homologous proteins, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 90, 579, 10.1002/prot.26254 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1073/pnas.1115898108 · DOI
  50. 2023, Evaluating native-like structures of RNA-protein complexes through the deep learning method, Nature Communications, 14, 1060, 10.1038/s41467-023-36720-9 · DOI
  51. 10.1093/nar/gkq1266 · DOI
  52. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq003 · DOI
  53. 2017, Modeling protein–protein and protein– peptide complexes: CAPRI 6th edition, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 85, 359, 10.1002/prot.25215 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1371/journal.pone.0161879 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1093/nar/gku077 · DOI
  56. 2022, Crystal structure of a pre-chemistry viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase suggests participation of two basic residues in catalysis, Nucleic Acids Research, 50, 12389, 10.1093/nar/gkac1133 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Roche, R., Tarafder, S., & Bhattacharya, D.
Affiliations
Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Bhattacharya, Debswapna
Venue
Cell Systems
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-07-28
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
101400-101400
ISSN
2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414303254
Cited by
4
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Systems (acceptedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2208679)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM138146)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
geometry optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review