PreprintCited by 17Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceEpigenetics and DNA MethylationCancer-related Molecular Pathways

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DNA methylation protects cancer cells against senescence

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-025-61157-7 · Paper page

Abstract

Inhibitors of DNA methylation such as 5-aza-deoxycytidine are widely used in experimental and clinical settings. However, their mechanism of action is such that DNA damage inevitably co-occurs with loss of DNA methylation, making it challenging to discern their respective effects. Here we deconvolute the effects of decreased DNA methylation and DNA damage on cancer cells, by using degron alleles of key DNA methylation regulators. We report that cancer cells with decreased DNA methylation —but no DNA damage— enter cellular senescence, with G1 arrest, SASP expression, and SA-β-gal positivity. This senescence is independent of p53 and Rb, but involves p21, which is cytoplasmic and inhibits apoptosis, and cGAS, playing a STING-independent role in the nucleus. Xenograft experiments show that tumor cells can be made senescent in vivo by decreasing DNA methylation. These findings reveal the intrinsic effects of loss of DNA methylation in cancer cells and have practical implications for future therapeutic approaches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.08.23.609297

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 78

  1. 10.1126/science.aat6806 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/s41576-024-00760-8 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nrg.2017.33 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2021, Staying true to yourself: mechanisms of DNA methylation maintenance in mammals, Nucleic Acids Res, 49, 3020, 10.1093/nar/gkaa1154 · DOI
  5. Laisné, M. , Gupta, N. , Kirsh, O. , Pradhan, S. and Defossez, P.-A. (2018) Mechanisms of DNA Methyltransferase Recruitment in Mammals. Genes (Basel), 9. · DOI
  6. 10.1038/s41467-022-34779-4 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/s41422-020-0359-9 · DOI
  8. 2023, Quantifying propagation of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation with iDEMS, Nat Cell Biol, 25, 183, 10.1038/s41556-022-01048-x · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nature06397 · DOI
  10. 10.1126/science.1147939 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.07.012 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 2019, Structure of the UHRF1 Tandem Tudor Domain Bound to a Methylated Non-histone Protein, LIG1, Reveals Rules for Binding and Regulation, Structure, 27, 485, 10.1016/j.str.2018.11.012 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/nature12488 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.09.037 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s41467-020-15006-4 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/nar/gkz080 · DOI
  17. 2024, Locus-level L1 DNA methylation profiling reveals the epigenetic and transcriptional interplay between L1s and their integration sites, Cell Genom, 4, 100498, 10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100498 · DOI
  18. 2022, Large-Scale Chromatin Rearrangements in Cancer, Cancers (Basel), 14, 2384, 10.3390/cancers14102384 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.tig.2021.05.002 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/nrg.2016.93 · DOI
  21. Sato, T. , Issa, J.-P. J. and Kropf, P. (2017) DNA Hypomethylating Drugs in Cancer Therapy. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 7. · DOI
  22. 10.1093/gerona/62.3.246 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.10.016 · DOI
  24. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0137 · DOI
  25. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1336 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.056 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.011 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.ceb.2021.12.006 · DOI
  29. 2024, Non-canonical functions of UHRF1 maintain DNA methylation homeostasis in cancer cells, Nat Commun, 15, 2960, 10.1038/s41467-024-47314-4 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1073/pnas.92.20.9363 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Yesbolatova, A. , Saito, Y. , Kitamoto, N. , Makino-Itou, H. , Ajima, R. , Nakano, R. , Nakaoka, H. , Fukui, K. , Gamo, K. , Tominari, Y. , et al. (2020) The auxin-inducible degron 2 technology provides sharp degradation control in yeast, mammalian cells, and mice. Nat Commun, 11. · DOI
  33. 2021, Discovery of a first-in-class reversible DNMT1-selective inhibitor with improved tolerability and efficacy in acute myeloid leukemia, Nat Cancer, 2, 1002, 10.1038/s43018-021-00249-x · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.03.003 · DOI
  35. 10.1101/gr.208108.116 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.ceb.2019.05.005 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/nrc2657 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.15252/embj.201695553 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/J.JMB.2019.05.036 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1073/pnas.150006697 · DOI
  41. 10.1073/pnas.081074898 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/nature01119 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/ng.3593 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1073/pnas.0801773105 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/s41467-018-05936-5 · DOI
  46. 2022, AP4 suppresses DNA damage, chromosomal instability and senescence via inducing MDC1/Mediator of DNA damage Checkpoint 1 and repressing MIR22HG/miR-22-3p, Molecular Cancer, 21, 120, 10.1186/s12943-022-01581-1 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/ncb3586 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1038/nature24050 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.034 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.029 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1073/pnas.1705499114 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 2024, mTORC2-driven chromatin cGAS mediates chemoresistance through epigenetic reprogramming in colorectal cancer, Nat Cell Biol, 26, 1585, 10.1038/s41556-024-01473-0 · DOI
  53. 2021, Inflammation-driven senescence-associated secretory phenotype in cancer-associated fibroblasts enhances peritoneal dissemination, Cell Reports, 34, 108779, 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108779 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 2024, Tunable DNMT1 degradation reveals DNMT1/DNMT3B synergy in DNA methylation and genome organization, Journal of Cell Biology, 223, e202307026, 10.1083/jcb.202307026 · DOI
  55. 10.1101/gr.208108.116 · DOI
  56. 10.1101/2024.02.13.580169 · DOI
  57. 10.1038/35010000 · DOI
  58. 10.1038/416552a · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1073/pnas.0610774104 · DOI
  60. 10.1242/dev.115980 · DOI
  61. 2024, DNA hypomethylation activates Cdk4/6 and Atr to induce DNA replication and cell cycle arrest to constrain liver outgrowth in zebrafish, Nucleic Acids Research, 52, 3069, 10.1093/nar/gkae031 · DOI
  62. 10.1101/gad.284992.116 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.008 · DOI
  64. 10.1038/s41586-021-03542-y · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1038/ng1259 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 2023, Methionine restriction promotes cGAS activation and chromatin untethering through demethylation to enhance antitumor immunity, Cancer Cell, 41, 1118, 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.05.005 · DOI
  67. 2023, Spurious intragenic transcription is a feature of mammalian cellular senescence and tissue aging, Nat Aging, 3, 402, 10.1038/s43587-023-00384-3 · DOI
  68. 2024, Histone chaperone HIRA, promyelocytic leukemia protein, and p62/SQSTM1 coordinate to regulate inflammation during cell senescence, Mol Cell, 84, 3271, 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.08.006 · DOI
  69. 2022, Exploiting senescence for the treatment of cancer, Nat Rev Cancer, 22, 340, 10.1038/s41568-022-00450-9 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 2020, Senescent Cells in Cancer Therapy: Friends or Foes?, Trends Cancer, 6, 838, 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 2022, Structural characterization of dicyanopyridine containing DNMT1-selective, non-nucleoside inhibitors, Structure, 30, 793, 10.1016/j.str.2022.03.009 · DOI
  73. 2021, Structure-based screening combined with computational and biochemical analyses identified the inhibitor targeting the binding of DNA Ligase 1 to UHRF1, Bioorg Med Chem, 52, 116500, 10.1016/j.bmc.2021.116500 · DOI
  74. 2019, A Molecular Tool Targeting the Base-Flipping Activity of Human UHRF1, Chemistry, 25, 13363, 10.1002/chem.201902605 · DOI
  75. 2021, Discovery of small molecules targeting the tandem tudor domain of the epigenetic factor UHRF1 using fragment-based ligand discovery, Sci Rep, 11, 1121, 10.1038/s41598-020-80588-4 · DOI
  76. 2018, Discovery of Small-Molecule Antagonists of the H3K9me3 Binding to UHRF1 Tandem Tudor Domain, SLAS Discov, 23, 930, 10.1177/2472555218766278 · DOI
  77. 2024, Targeting cancer with small-molecule pan-KRAS degraders, Science, 385, 1338, 10.1126/science.adm8684 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.01.003 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Chen, X., Yamaguchi, K., Rodgers, B., Goehrig, D., Vindrieux, D., Lahaye, X., Nolot, M., Ferry, L., Martin, N., Dubus, P., Miura, F., Ito, T., Manel, N., Kanemaki, M., Bernard, D., & Defossez, P.-A.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • National Institute of Genetics (JP)
  • Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR)
  • Université de Bordeaux (FR)
  • Life Science Data Research Center (JP)
  • Kyushu University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Yamaguchi, Kosuke
  • Defossez, Pierre-Antoine
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-08-23
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
5901-5901
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411881888
Cited by
17
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 4
FWCI
10.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Sidaction
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP23ama121022)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-21-CE13-0030, 10-INBS-04, ANR-11-LABX-0071, ANR-21-CE15, 22-2-AEQ-13411, ANR‐10_INBS‐04, ANR18, ANR-23-CE12-0015, ANR-21-CE15-0037, ANR-23-CE12, ANR-23, ANR-10, ANR-18-IDEX-0001)
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FDT202404018544, ANR-10-INBS-04, ANR-18-IDEX-0001, ANR-11-LABX-0071, EQU202503019988, EQU202103012774)
  • Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ANR-18-IDEX-0001, ANR-11-LABX-0071, ANR-10-INBS-04)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (#ANR-18-IDEX-0001, ANR-10-INBS-04, ANR-11-LABX-0071)
  • Institut National Du Cancer (ANR-11-LABX-0071, #ANR-18-IDEX-0001, ANR-10-INBS-04, INCa-18350)
  • Fondation Bettencourt Schueller
  • Université de Paris (ANR-18- IDEX-0001, 18-IDEX-0001)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
DNA methylation, cellular senescence, cancer cells, 5-aza-deoxycytidine, DNA damage, p21, cGAS, G1 cell cycle arrest, senescence-associated secretory phenotype, p53-independent senescence, tumor xenografts, apoptosis inhibition
MeSH terms
Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype, Animals, DNA Damage, Female, Humans, Mice, Nude, Neoplasms, Nucleotidyltransferases, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Cellular Senescence, Apoptosis, DNA Methylation, Cell Line, Tumor, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review