PreprintCited by 1Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesEvolution and Genetic DynamicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detecting interspecific positive selection using convolutional neural networks

Open access
West, Charlotte, Walker, Conor R., Arasti, Shayesteh, Vasilev, Viacheslav, Xu, Xingze, De Maio, Nicola, Goldman, Nick·2024·Molecular Biology and Evolution

Preprint — published as 10.1093/molbev/msaf154 · Paper page

Abstract

Traditional statistical methods using maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference can detect positive selection from an interspecific phylogeny and a codon sequence alignment based on model assumptions, but they are prone to false positives due to alignment errors and can lack power. These problems are particularly pronounced when faced with high levels of indels and divergence. Leveraging the feature-detection capabilities of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), we achieve higher accuracy in detecting selection across a specific range of phylogenetic scenarios and evolutionary modes. This advantage is particularly evident with noisy data prone to misalignments. Our method shows some ability to account for these errors, where most statistical frameworks fail to do so in a tractable manner. We explore generalisability and identify future avenues to achieve broader utility. Once trained, our CNN model is faster at test time, making it a scalable alternative to traditional statistical methods for large-scale, multi-gene analyses. In addition to binary classification (inference of the presence or absence of positive selection during the evolution of the sequences), we use saliency maps to understand what the model learns and observe how this could be leveraged for sitewise inference of positive selection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.11.18.624117

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 80

  1. Álvarez-Carretero, S. , P. Kapli , and Z. Yang (2023). Beginner’s guide on the use of PAML to detect positive selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 40, msad041. · DOI
  2. 2017, Approximate maximum likelihood estimation for population genetic inference, Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 16, 291
  3. 10.1073/pnas.97.10.5322 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.ympev.2023.107905 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/molbev/msp063 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1093/molbev/mss266 · DOI
  7. 10.1148/ryai.2021210097 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1093/molbev/msy224 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/molbev/msp098 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/molbev/msq115 · DOI
  11. 2015, Unsupervised domain adaptation by backpropagation, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 37, 1180
  12. 10.1007/s10994-022-06268-8 · DOI
  13. 2010, Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 9, 249
  14. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040153 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1101/418657 · DOI
  16. 10.1148/ryai.230246 · DOI
  17. 2015, Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift, arXiv
  18. 10.1093/molbev/msw114 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/molbev/msr272 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/molbev/mst010 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 2017, Adam: a method, arXiv
  22. 2024, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 15058, 1
  23. 10.1145/3065386. · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.08.026 · DOI
  25. Kumar, S. (2022). Embracing green computing in molecular phylogenetics. Molecular Biology and Evolution 39, msac043. · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1073/pnas.022629899 · DOI
  27. Längkvist, M. , M. Alirezaie , A. Kiselev , and A. Loutfi (2016). Interactive learning with convolutional neural networks for image labeling. Presented at International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). New York, USA, 9–15th July, 2016.
  28. 10.1093/nar/gkx704 · DOI
  29. 10.21105/joss.00747 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.csda.2023.107762 · DOI
  31. 2013, Network in network, arXiv
  32. 2017, Decoupled weight decay regularization, arXiv
  33. 10.1126/science.1158395 · DOI
  34. 10.1371/journal.pone.0248337 · DOI
  35. 2022, Data contamination: from memorization to exploitation, arXiv
  36. 10.1093/sysbio/syv082 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.042 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1534/genetics.104.032144 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003827 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr553 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040152 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1101/2024.06.17.599404 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/nprot.2009.97 · DOI
  44. 10.1101/gr.2450504 · DOI
  45. 10.1093/molbev/msj035 · DOI
  46. 10.1101/2021.09.28.462230 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/molbev/msz122 · DOI
  48. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti079 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 2021, MSA transformer, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 139, 8844
  50. 10.1093/molbev/msu174 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/s41467-022-30390-9 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1038/s41586-022-04823-w · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1186/gb-2014-15-1-r1 · DOI
  54. 10.1002/PRO.3290 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1038/msb.2011.75 · DOI
  56. Simonyan, K. , A. Vedaldi , and A. Zisserman (2014). Deep inside convolutional networks: visualising image classification models and saliency maps. 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2014), Workshop Track Proceedings. Ed. by Bengio, Y. and LeCun, Y. Banff , Canada, 14–16 April, 2014.
  57. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-104 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02372-1 · DOI
  59. 2022, Accurate phylogenetic inference with a symmetry-preserving neural network model, arXiv
  60. 2020, A comparison of optimization algorithms for deep learning, International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 34, 1
  61. 2014, Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15, 1929
  62. 10.1093/sysbio/syz060 · DOI
  63. 10.1093/nar/gkl315 · DOI
  64. 10.1101/gr.1977804 · DOI
  65. 10.1186/s12859-019-2927-x · DOI
  66. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu668 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 2020, Ambiguity coding allows accurate inference of evolutionary parameters from alignments in an aggregated state-space, Systematic Biology, 70, 21
  68. 10.1371/journal.pone.0067863 · DOI
  69. 10.1093/molbev/msaa037 · DOI
  70. 10.1126/science.1151532 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1534/genetics.104.031153 · DOI
  72. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025957 · DOI
  73. 10.1093/molbev/msm088 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Yang, Z. (2014). Molecular Evolution: a Statistical Approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  75. 10.1073/pnas.0904550106 · DOI
  76. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004148 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1093/genetics/155.1.431 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1093/molbev/msi097 · DOI
  79. 10.1093/molbev/msi237 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1093/molbev/msz307 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
West, C., Walker, C. R., Arasti, S., Vasilev, V., Xu, X., De Maio, N., & Goldman, N.
Affiliations
European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Goldman, Nick
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-11-19
Volume
42
Issue
7
ISSN
0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411802203
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research ([IS-BRC-1215-20014, BRC1215-20014, IS-BRC-1215)
  • NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre ((BRC-1215-20014), IS-BRC-1215-20014)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
positive selection, convolutional neural networks, alignment errors, indels, false positives, saliency maps, simulated data
MeSH terms
Convolutional Neural Networks, Models, Genetic, Phylogeny, Selection, Genetic, Neural Networks, Computer, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review