PreprintCited by 2Protein Structure and DynamicsBiochemical and Structural CharacterizationEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimizing stability in dynamic small-molecule binding proteins

Open access
Scherer, Marc, Kriegel, Mark, Höcker, Birte, Fleishman, Sarel J.·2025·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Preprint — published as 10.1021/jacs.5c19571 · Paper page

Abstract

The function of dynamic proteins is determined by the stability of distinct conformational states and the energy barriers that separate these states. For most dynamic proteins, the molecular details of the energy barriers are not known, implying a fundamental limit to the ability of protein design methods to engineer beneficial mutations without disrupting activity. We hypothesized that designing mutations that are compatible with structurally distinct equilibrium conformations may enable reliable stability design. We focus on periplasmic binding proteins (PBPs), a superfamily of dynamic proteins that change conformation from open to closed states in response to binding their small-molecule ligands. We find that the evolutionary constrained space of allowed mutations computed for one conformation is incompatible with the other. Therefore, putative conformational hinge points and interface residues were additionally constraint, and incompatible mutations were filtered out. Starting from four different PBPs, we designed a total of 16 stabilized variants with 7-28 mutations each. Our results show that design based on a single conformation with evolutionary constraints is not sufficient to maintain wild type-like binding affinity. Conversely, using a subset of mutations compatible with both conformations and structural constraints reliably enhances thermal stability while mitigating trade-offs in ligand binding. Our work demonstrates a straightforward method for the one-shot stabilization of dynamic proteins, which is critically required to generate robust starting points for thermostable and responsive biosensors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.07.07.663574

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. 10.1126/science.1749933 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nature06522 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/nature13001 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-030722-125440 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nchembio.1670 · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.2026165118 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.aaw1147 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.01.033 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.1187409 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.012 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1071 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/nar/gkx285 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/bib/bbae425 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41598-021-89785-1 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/pro.4995 · DOI
  16. 10.1021/acssensors.1c01803 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s10930-023-10155-z · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nature01556 · DOI
  19. 10.1073/pnas.0907950106 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/1873-3468.12445 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/nsmb.3216 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.3389/fmolb.2021.699222 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.talo.2021.100038 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/nature06232 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)68161-5 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.sbi.2004.07.004 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.1112534108 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.str.2020.12.005 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2024.05.002 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/prot.23118 · DOI
  31. 10.1101/2024.07.27.605435 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/s41589-020-00718-x · DOI
  33. 10.1038/s41592-018-0171-3 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.166964 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/s41467-021-26508-0 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/ncomms4724 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.12.010 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101419 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.06.002 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167036 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1905 · DOI
  43. 10.1529/biophysj.106.090803 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/S1359-0278(97)00024-2 · DOI
  45. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3090 · DOI
  46. 10.1073/pnas.032522499 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr168 · DOI
  48. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab187 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/nprot.2006.202 · DOI
  50. 10.1002/pro.2809 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.str.2020.12.005 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/s41467-021-26508-0 · DOI
  53. 10.1021/bi00159a003 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00253-0 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)82131-7 · DOI
  56. 1994, Structural basis for multiple ligand specificity of the periplasmic lysine-, arginine-, ornithine-binding protein, J. Biol. Chem, 269, 26323, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)47196-7 · DOI
  57. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Scherer, M., Kriegel, M., Höcker, B., & Fleishman, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
  • University of Bayreuth (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Höcker, Birte
  • Fleishman, Sarel J.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-07-07
Volume
148
Issue
1
Pages
1911-1918
ISSN
0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7117490406
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Union Horizon 2020 (955623, 951375)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Keywords
protein stability engineering, periplasmic binding protein, conformational barriers, ligand binding affinity, thermal stability, interface residues
MeSH terms
Ligands, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Protein Engineering, Periplasmic Binding Proteins, Protein Stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review