The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimizing stability in dynamic small-molecule binding proteins
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1021/jacs.5c19571 · Paper page
Abstract
The function of dynamic proteins is determined by the stability of distinct conformational states and the energy barriers that separate these states. For most dynamic proteins, the molecular details of the energy barriers are not known, implying a fundamental limit to the ability of protein design methods to engineer beneficial mutations without disrupting activity. We hypothesized that designing mutations that are compatible with structurally distinct equilibrium conformations may enable reliable stability design. We focus on periplasmic binding proteins (PBPs), a superfamily of dynamic proteins that change conformation from open to closed states in response to binding their small-molecule ligands. We find that the evolutionary constrained space of allowed mutations computed for one conformation is incompatible with the other. Therefore, putative conformational hinge points and interface residues were additionally constraint, and incompatible mutations were filtered out. Starting from four different PBPs, we designed a total of 16 stabilized variants with 7-28 mutations each. Our results show that design based on a single conformation with evolutionary constraints is not sufficient to maintain wild type-like binding affinity. Conversely, using a subset of mutations compatible with both conformations and structural constraints reliably enhances thermal stability while mitigating trade-offs in ligand binding. Our work demonstrates a straightforward method for the one-shot stabilization of dynamic proteins, which is critically required to generate robust starting points for thermostable and responsive biosensors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- 10.1126/science.1749933 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature06522 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature13001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev-biophys-030722-125440 · DOI
- 10.1038/nchembio.1670 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2026165118 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaw1147 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.01.033 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1187409 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.012 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1071 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkx285 · DOI
- 10.1093/bib/bbae425 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-021-89785-1 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.4995 · DOI
- 10.1021/acssensors.1c01803 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10930-023-10155-z · DOI
- 10.1038/nature01556 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0907950106 · DOI
- 10.1002/1873-3468.12445 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nsmb.3216 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fmolb.2021.699222 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.talo.2021.100038 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature06232 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)68161-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2004.07.004 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1112534108 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2020.12.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chembiol.2024.05.002 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.23118 · DOI
- 10.1101/2024.07.27.605435 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41589-020-00718-x · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-018-0171-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.166964 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-26508-0 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms4724 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.12.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101419 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.06.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167036 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1905 · DOI
- 10.1529/biophysj.106.090803 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1359-0278(97)00024-2 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3090 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.032522499 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr168 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab187 · DOI
- 10.1038/nprot.2006.202 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.2809 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2020.12.005 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-26508-0 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi00159a003 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00253-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)82131-7 · DOI
- 1994, Structural basis for multiple ligand specificity of the periplasmic lysine-, arginine-, ornithine-binding protein, J. Biol. Chem, 269, 26323, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)47196-7 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Scherer, M., Kriegel, M., Höcker, B., & Fleishman, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
- University of Bayreuth (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Höcker, Birte
- Fleishman, Sarel J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2025-07-07
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1911-1918
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12814167
- OpenAlex
- W7117490406
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- European Union Horizon 2020 (955623, 951375)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
- Keywords
- protein stability engineering, periplasmic binding protein, conformational barriers, ligand binding affinity, thermal stability, interface residues
- MeSH terms
- Ligands, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Protein Engineering, Periplasmic Binding Proteins, Protein Stability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review