The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Random forest based similarity learning for single cell RNA sequencing data
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty260
Abstract
Motivation: Genome-wide transcriptome sequencing applied to single cells (scRNA-seq) is rapidly becoming an assay of choice across many fields of biological and biomedical research. Scientific objectives often revolve around discovery or characterization of types or sub-types of cells, and therefore obtaining accurate cell–cell similarities from scRNA-seq data is critical step in many studies. While rapid advances are being made in the development of tools for scRNA-seq data analysis, few approaches exist that explicitly address this task. Furthermore, abundance and type of noise present in scRNA-seq datasets suggest that application of generic methods, or of methods developed for bulk RNA-seq data, is likely suboptimal. Results: Here we present RAFSIL, a random forest based approach to learn cell–cell similarities from scRNA-seq data. RAFSIL implements a two-step procedure, where feature construction geared towards scRNA-seq data is followed by similarity learning. It is designed to be adaptable and expandable, and RAFSIL similarities can be used for typical exploratory data analysis tasks like dimension reduction, visualization, and clustering. We show that our approach compares favorably with current methods across a diverse collection of datasets, and that it can be used to detect and highlight unwanted technical variation in scRNA-seq datasets in situations where other methods fail. Overall, RAFSIL implements a flexible approach yielding a useful tool that improves the analysis of scRNA-seq data. Availability and Implementation: The RAFSIL R package is available online at www.kostkalab.net/software.html
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cluster robustness was assessed by training a random forest classifier on half of the cells and predicting cluster membership of the remaining half.
“For each principal component/resolution parameter pair, the overall cluster robustness was assessed by training a random forest classifier17 on half of the cells and predicting the cluster membership of the remaining half.”
From Single cell RNA sequencing of human microglia uncovers a subset associated with Alzheimer’s disease (2020) · cites this paper as [17]
In “Dimension reduction improves clustering” (page unavailable), the paper assesses cluster robustness by excluding 10% of cells and rerunning each clustering approach 20 times—not by training on half the cells and predicting the other half. Sections 2.3.1–2.3.2 describe random forest classifiers used to learn cell similarities, not to predict held-out cluster membership. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Adam, M. , Potter, A. S. , and Potter, S. (2017). Psychrophilic proteases dramatically reduce single cell RNA-seq artifacts: A molecular atlas of kidney development. Development. · DOI · Paper page
- Arthur, D. and Vassilvitskii, S. (2007). K-means++: The advantages of careful seeding. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA’07, pages 1027–1035, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
- 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.3102 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/03610928308827180 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13059-016-0881-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ni.3437 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.047 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature14966 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004575 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01908075 · DOI · Paper page
- Kiselev, V. Y. , Kirschner, K. , Schaub, M. T. , Andrews, T. , Yiu, A. , Chandra, T. , Natarajan, K. N. , Reik, W. , Barahona, M. , Green, A. R. , et al. (2017b). Sc3: consensus clustering of single-cell rna-seq data. Nature methods. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.stem.2015.09.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1242/dev.133058 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth294 · DOI
- 2015, Oscope: a statistical pipeline for identifying oscillatory genes in unsynchronized single cell rna-seq experiments, gene, 1, 1
- 10.1093/nar/gkx681 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1254257 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.2967 · DOI · Paper page
- 2017, Clustering single-cell expression data using random forest graphs, IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 21, 1172, 10.1109/JBHI.2016.2565561 · DOI
- Ramirez, K. S. , Knight, C. G. , De Hollander, M. , Brearley, F. Q. , Constantinides, B. , Cotton, A. , Creer, S. , Crowther, T. W. , Davison, J. , Delgado-Baquerizo, M. , et al. (2017). Detecting macroecological patterns in bacterial communities across independent studies of global soils. Nature microbiology, page 1. · DOI
- 10.1038/nature03672 · DOI
- 2006, Unsupervised learning with random forest predictors, 15, 118
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm069 · DOI
- 2002, Cluster ensembles—a knowledge reuse framework for combining multiple partitions, Journal of machine learning research, 3, 583
- 10.1038/nmeth.4220 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF02289263 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9868.00196 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature13173 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nn.3881 · DOI · Paper page
- 2009, Dimensionality reduction: a comparative, J Mach Learn Res, >10, 66
- 2008, Visualizing data using t-SNE, JLMR, 9, 2579
- 2010, Information theoretic measures for clusterings comparison: Variants, properties, normalization and correction for chance, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 2837
- 2017, Visualization and analysis of single-cell rna-seq data by kernel-based similarity learning, Nature Methods, 14, 414, 10.1038/nmeth.4207 · DOI
- 2013, Cluster forests, Comput Statistics Data Analysis, 66, 178, 10.1016/j.csda.2013.04.010 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13059-017-1218-y · DOI
- Žurauskienė, J. and Yau, C. (2015). pcaReduce: Hierarchical Clustering of Single Cell Transcriptional Profiles. R package version 1.0. · DOI
- 10.1186/s12859-016-0984-y · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Single cell RNA sequencing of human microglia uncovers a subset associated with Alzheimer’s disease
Olah, M., Menon, V., Habib, N., Taga, M. F., Ma, Y., Yung, C. J., Cimpean, M., Khairallah, A., Coronas-Samano, G., Sankowski, R., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19737-2 · Cited by 722
Metadata
- Authors
- Pouyan, M. B., & Kostka, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kostka, Dennis
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2018-02-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- i79-i88
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6022547
- OpenAlex
- W2791624046
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Pittsburgh
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM115836)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- single-cell RNA sequencing, similarity learning, random forest, feature construction, dimensionality reduction, clustering, cell type discovery
- MeSH terms
- Software, Cluster Analysis, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Single-Cell Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review