PreprintCited by 50Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Random forest based similarity learning for single cell RNA sequencing data

Open access
Pouyan, Maziyar Baran, Kostka, Dennis·2018·Bioinformatics

Preprint — published as 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty260

Abstract

Motivation: Genome-wide transcriptome sequencing applied to single cells (scRNA-seq) is rapidly becoming an assay of choice across many fields of biological and biomedical research. Scientific objectives often revolve around discovery or characterization of types or sub-types of cells, and therefore obtaining accurate cell–cell similarities from scRNA-seq data is critical step in many studies. While rapid advances are being made in the development of tools for scRNA-seq data analysis, few approaches exist that explicitly address this task. Furthermore, abundance and type of noise present in scRNA-seq datasets suggest that application of generic methods, or of methods developed for bulk RNA-seq data, is likely suboptimal. Results: Here we present RAFSIL, a random forest based approach to learn cell–cell similarities from scRNA-seq data. RAFSIL implements a two-step procedure, where feature construction geared towards scRNA-seq data is followed by similarity learning. It is designed to be adaptable and expandable, and RAFSIL similarities can be used for typical exploratory data analysis tasks like dimension reduction, visualization, and clustering. We show that our approach compares favorably with current methods across a diverse collection of datasets, and that it can be used to detect and highlight unwanted technical variation in scRNA-seq datasets in situations where other methods fail. Overall, RAFSIL implements a flexible approach yielding a useful tool that improves the analysis of scRNA-seq data. Availability and Implementation: The RAFSIL R package is available online at www.kostkalab.net/software.html

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/258699

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cluster robustness was assessed by training a random forest classifier on half of the cells and predicting cluster membership of the remaining half.

    “For each principal component/resolution parameter pair, the overall cluster robustness was assessed by training a random forest classifier17 on half of the cells and predicting the cluster membership of the remaining half.”

    From Single cell RNA sequencing of human microglia uncovers a subset associated with Alzheimer’s disease (2020) · cites this paper as [17]

    In “Dimension reduction improves clustering” (page unavailable), the paper assesses cluster robustness by excluding 10% of cells and rerunning each clustering approach 20 times—not by training on half the cells and predicting the other half. Sections 2.3.1–2.3.2 describe random forest classifiers used to learn cell similarities, not to predict held-out cluster membership. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Adam, M. , Potter, A. S. , and Potter, S. (2017). Psychrophilic proteases dramatically reduce single cell RNA-seq artifacts: A molecular atlas of kidney development. Development. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Arthur, D. and Vassilvitskii, S. (2007). K-means++: The advantages of careful seeding. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA’07, pages 1027–1035, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
  3. 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/nbt.3102 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1080/03610928308827180 · DOI
  6. 10.1186/s13059-016-0881-8 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/ni.3437 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.047 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/nature14966 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004575 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/BF01908075 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Kiselev, V. Y. , Kirschner, K. , Schaub, M. T. , Andrews, T. , Yiu, A. , Chandra, T. , Natarajan, K. N. , Reik, W. , Barahona, M. , Green, A. R. , et al. (2017b). Sc3: consensus clustering of single-cell rna-seq data. Nature methods. · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.stem.2015.09.011 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1242/dev.133058 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth294 · DOI
  16. 2015, Oscope: a statistical pipeline for identifying oscillatory genes in unsynchronized single cell rna-seq experiments, gene, 1, 1
  17. 10.1093/nar/gkx681 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1126/science.1254257 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1038/nbt.2967 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 2017, Clustering single-cell expression data using random forest graphs, IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 21, 1172, 10.1109/JBHI.2016.2565561 · DOI
  21. Ramirez, K. S. , Knight, C. G. , De Hollander, M. , Brearley, F. Q. , Constantinides, B. , Cotton, A. , Creer, S. , Crowther, T. W. , Davison, J. , Delgado-Baquerizo, M. , et al. (2017). Detecting macroecological patterns in bacterial communities across independent studies of global soils. Nature microbiology, page 1. · DOI
  22. 10.1038/nature03672 · DOI
  23. 2006, Unsupervised learning with random forest predictors, 15, 118
  24. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm069 · DOI
  25. 2002, Cluster ensembles—a knowledge reuse framework for combining multiple partitions, Journal of machine learning research, 3, 583
  26. 10.1038/nmeth.4220 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1007/BF02289263 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/1467-9868.00196 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1038/nature13173 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1038/nn.3881 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 2009, Dimensionality reduction: a comparative, J Mach Learn Res, >10, 66
  32. 2008, Visualizing data using t-SNE, JLMR, 9, 2579
  33. 2010, Information theoretic measures for clusterings comparison: Variants, properties, normalization and correction for chance, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 2837
  34. 2017, Visualization and analysis of single-cell rna-seq data by kernel-based similarity learning, Nature Methods, 14, 414, 10.1038/nmeth.4207 · DOI
  35. 2013, Cluster forests, Comput Statistics Data Analysis, 66, 178, 10.1016/j.csda.2013.04.010 · DOI
  36. 10.1186/s13059-017-1218-y · DOI
  37. Žurauskienė, J. and Yau, C. (2015). pcaReduce: Hierarchical Clustering of Single Cell Transcriptional Profiles. R package version 1.0. · DOI
  38. 10.1186/s12859-016-0984-y · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pouyan, M. B., & Kostka, D.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Kostka, Dennis
Venue
Bioinformatics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2018-02-01
Volume
34
Issue
13
Pages
i79-i88
ISSN
1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791624046
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM115836)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
single-cell RNA sequencing, similarity learning, random forest, feature construction, dimensionality reduction, clustering, cell type discovery
MeSH terms
Software, Cluster Analysis, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review