PreprintCited by 136Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Asymmetric molecular architecture of the human γ -tubulin ring complex

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.007 · Paper page

Abstract

SUMMARY: The γ -tubulin ring complex ( γ -TuRC) is an essential regulator of centrosomal and acentrosomal microtubule formation 1–4 . Metazoan γ -TuRCs isolate as ∼2 MDa complexes containing the conserved proteins γ -tubulin, GCP2 and GCP3, as well as the expanded subunits GCP4, GCP5, and GCP6 3,5,6 . However, in current structural models, γ -TuRCs assemble solely from subcomplexes of γ -tubulin, GCP2 and GCP3 7 . The role of the metazoan-specific subunits in γ -TuRC assembly and architecture are not currently known, due to a lack of high resolution structural data for the native complex. Here, we present a cryo-EM structure of the native human γ -TuRC at 3.8Å resolution. Our reconstruction reveals an asymmetric, single helical-turn and cone-shaped structure built from at least 34 polypeptides. Pseudo-atomic models indicate that GCP4, GCP5 and GCP6 form distinct Y-shaped assemblies that structurally mimic GCP2/GCP3 subcomplexes and are distal to the γ -TuRC “seam”. Evolutionary expansion in metazoan-specific subunits diversifies the γ -TuRC by introducing large (>100,000 Å 2 ) surfaces that could interact with different regulatory factors. We also identify an unanticipated structural bridge that includes an actin-like protein and spans the γ -TuRC lumen. Despite its asymmetric composition and architecture, the human γ -TuRC arranges γ -tubulins into a helical geometry poised to nucleate microtubules. The observed compositional complexity of the γ -TuRC could self-regulate its assembly into a cone-shaped structure to control microtubule formation across diverse contexts, e.g. within biological condensates 8 or alongside existing filaments 9 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/820142

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. 10.1083/jcb.121.4.823 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90503-7 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/378578a0 · DOI
  4. 10.1093/emboj/16.7.1550 · DOI
  5. 10.1083/jcb.144.4.721 · DOI
  6. 2001, GCP5 and GCP6: Two New Members of the Human γ-Tubulin Complex, MBoC, 12, 3340, 10.1091/mbc.12.11.3340 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/nature09207 · DOI
  8. So, C. et al. A liquid-like spindle domain promotes acentrosomal spindle assembly in mammalian oocytes. Science 364, (2019). · DOI
  9. 10.1083/jcb.200711053 · DOI
  10. 2008, The Structure of the γ-Tubulin Small Complex: Implications of Its Architecture and Flexibility for Microtubule Nucleation, MBoC, 19, 207, 10.1091/mbc.e07-09-0879 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/35014058 · DOI
  12. 10.1091/mbc.E10-05-0408 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/338662a0 · DOI
  14. 10.1083/jcb.201007030 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/nrm3209 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/bs.mie.2016.04.012 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nature03586 · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.0801155105 · DOI
  19. 10.1101/310813 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/nsmb.2083 · DOI
  21. 10.1074/jbc.M116.744862 · DOI
  22. 10.1042/EBC20180028 · DOI
  23. 10.1242/jcs.195321 · DOI
  24. 10.1083/jcb.151.7.1513 · DOI
  25. Wu, S. & Zhang, Y. MUSTER: improving protein sequence profile–profile alignments by using multiple sources of structure information. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. (2008). · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.036 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/emboj/16.7.1550 · DOI
  28. 10.1101/311027 · DOI
  29. 10.1091/mbc.02-01-0607 · DOI
  30. 10.1074/jbc.M601973200 · DOI
  31. 10.1126/science.aaa4080 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Pollard, T. D. Actin and Actin-Binding Proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 8, (2016). · DOI
  33. 10.1126/science.287.5456.1279 · DOI
  34. 10.1083/jcb.200510028 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/ncb3030 · DOI
  36. 10.1083/jcb.201601099 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/ncomms12187 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/nsmb.2953 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.str.2010.05.010 · DOI
  40. Rice, L. , Moritz, M. & Agard, D. A. Microtubules form by progressively faster tubulin accretion, not by nucleation-elongation. bioRxiv (2019). · DOI
  41. 10.1038/35014045 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/35014051 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/nature14427 · DOI
  44. 10.1006/viro.1998.9107 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/msb.2011.82 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1083/jcb.90.3.554 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.028 · DOI
  48. 10.1101/543066 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/nmeth.3170 · DOI
  50. Abmayr, S. M. & Carrozza, M. J. Preparation of Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extracts from Mammalian Cells. in Current Protocols in Pharmacology (eds. Enna, S. J. et al.) (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001). · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.jsb.2017.02.008 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/nmeth.4193 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008 · DOI
  55. Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. Elife 7, (2018). · DOI
  56. 10.1038/nature14548 · DOI
  57. 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI
  58. 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1093/nar/gkv332 · DOI
  60. 10.1038/nprot.2015.053 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 2014, Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps, Nat. Methods, 11, 63, 10.1038/nmeth.2727 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Wieczorek, M., Urnavicius, L., Ti, S.-C., Molloy, K. R., Chait, B. T., & Kapoor, T. M.
Affiliations
Rockefeller University (US)
Corresponding author
Kapoor, Tarun M.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2019-10-25
Volume
180
Issue
1
Pages
165-175.e16
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995545804
Cited by
136
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 1
FWCI
9.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Human Frontier Science Program
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41GM109824, R35GM130234)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Keywords
γ-tubulin ring complex, microtubule nucleation, protein complex formation
MeSH terms
Actins, HeLa Cells, Humans, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Microtubules, Tubulin, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Microtubule-Organizing Center

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review