The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cell-to-cell variability in JAK2/STAT5 pathway components and cytoplasmic volumes define survival threshold in erythroid progenitor cells
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109507
Abstract
Summary: Survival or apoptosis is a binary decision in individual cells. Yet, at the cell population level, a graded increase in survival of CFU-E cells is observed upon stimulation with Erythropoietin (Epo). To identify components of JAK2/STAT5 signal transduction that contribute to the graded population response, a cell population-level model calibrated with experimental data was extended to study the behavior in single cells. The single-cell model showed that the high cell-to-cell variability in nuclear phosphorylated STAT5 is caused by variability in the amount of EpoR:JAK2 complexes and of SHP1 as well as the extent of nuclear import due to the large variance in the cytoplasmic volume of CFU-E cells. 24 to 118 pSTAT5 molecules in the nucleus for 120 min are sufficient to ensure cell survival. Thus, variability in membrane-associated processes are responsible to convert a switch-like behavior at the single-cell level to a graded population level response. Highlights: Mathematical modeling enables integration of heterogeneous data Single-cell modeling captures binary decision process Multiple sources of cell-to-cell variability in erythroid progenitor cells Minimal amount of active STAT5 sufficient for survival of erythroid progenitor cells
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · cited 2×
“More importantly, since it has been shown that the correlation between mRNA expression levels and protein abundance is low (Schwanhausser et al, 2011) and intracellular information processing, which links e.g. changes in ligand concentration to cell fate decisions, is executed by complex non-linear…”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 83
- 10.15252/msb.20167258 · DOI
- 10.1038/msb.2011.50 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr370 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.018 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1184913 · DOI
- 2018, Erythroleukemia-historical perspectives and recent advances in diagnosis and management, Blood Rev, 32, 96, 10.1016/j.blre.2017.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.2317 · DOI · Paper page
- 2014, Identification of isoform-specific dynamics in phosphorylation-dependent STAT5 dimerization by quantitative mass spectrometry and mathematical modeling, J Proteome Res, 13, 5685, 10.1021/pr5006923 · DOI
- Bressloff PC (2014) Stochastic processes in cell biology, Cham: Springer. · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.3102 · DOI · Paper page
- 2015, Mathematical modelling of fluid transport and its regulation at multiple scales, Biosystems, 130, 1, 10.1016/j.biosystems.2015.02.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.025 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.71.5.1677 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrg3484 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.2038 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.onc.1210421 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1611428114 · DOI
- 2018, Multi-experiment nonlinear mixed effect modeling of single-cell translation kinetics after transfection, NPJ Syst Biol Appl, 5, 1
- 2017, Parameter estimation for dynamical systems with discrete events and logical operations, Bioinformatics, 33, 1049, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw764 · DOI
- Gilitschenski I , Hanebeck UD (2013). Efficient deterministic dirac mixture approximation of Gaussian distributions. American Control Conference (ACC’13), Washington, DC/USA, June 17-19, 2013; IEEE, Piscataway (NJ).
- 1996, Identification of tyrosine residues within the intracellular domain of the erythropoietin receptor crucial for STAT5 activation, EMBO J, 15, 2434, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00601.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.017 · DOI · Paper page
- 1995, Prolactin, growth hormone, erythropoietin and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor induce MGF-Stat5 DNA binding activity, EMBO J, 14, 2005, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07192.x · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.3971 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/pr3007232 · DOI
- Hanebeck UD , Klumpp V (2008). Localized Cumulative Distributions and a multivariate generalization of the Cramér-von Mises distance. IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems; Seoul.
- 2017, Mathematical model of early Reelin-induced Src family kinase-mediated signaling, PLoS One, 12, e0186927, 10.1371/journal.pone.0186927 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncb2864 · DOI
- 10.1038/ni0706-681 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1089014.1089020 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl485 · DOI · Paper page
- 2016, Modeling Cellular Noise Underlying Heterogeneous Cell Responses in the Epidermal Growth Factor Signaling Pathway, PLoS Comput Biol, 12, e1005222, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005222 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12918-015-0203-x · DOI
- 1993, Survival or death of individual proerythroblasts results from differing erythropoietin sensitivities: a mechanism for controlled rates of erythrocyte production, Blood, 82, 2340, 10.1182/blood.V82.8.2340.2340 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8324 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4939-2095-2_3 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm397 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.1558 · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, A Hierarchical, Data-Driven Approach to Modeling Single-Cell Populations Predicts Latent Causes of Cell-To-Cell Variability, Cell Syst, 6, 593, 10.1016/j.cels.2018.04.008 · DOI
- 10.1002/bit.260180604 · DOI · Paper page
- 2016, Driving the Model to Its Limit: Profile Likelihood Based Model Reduction, PLoS One, 11, e0162366, 10.1371/journal.pone.0162366 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.015 · DOI
- 2016, Identification of Cell Type-Specific Differences in Erythropoietin Receptor Signaling in Primary Erythroid and Lung Cancer Cells, PLoS Comput Biol, 12, e1005049, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005049 · DOI
- 2012, Update for the logicle data scale including operational code implementations, Cytometry A, 81, 273
- 10.1016/S0968-0004(03)00091-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1231456 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.09.015 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.96.2.386 · DOI
- 1984, Cell kinetic behaviour of a synchronized population of erythroid precursor cells in vitro, Cell Tissue Kinet, 17, 629
- 10.1002/cyto.a.20258 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0913798107 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1222161 · DOI
- 10.1038/nri1416 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00140873 · DOI
- Pop R , Shearstone JR , Shen Q , Liu Y , Hallstrom K , Koulnis M , Gribnau J , Socolovsky M (2010) A key commitment step in erythropoiesis is synchronized with the cell cycle clock through mutual inhibition between PU.1 and S-phase progression. PLoS Biol 8 · DOI · Paper page
- 1985, History of the BALB/c family, Curr Top Microbiol Immunol, 122, 1
- 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.050 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.3528102 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp358 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0074335 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv405 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.01.007 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M003456200 · DOI
- 1978, Estimating the dimension of a model, Ann Statist, 6, 461, 10.1214/aos/1176344136 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.11.016 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08282 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81013-2 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood.V98.12.3261 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08012 · DOI
- 2018, PESTO: Parameter EStimation TOolbox, Bioinformatics, 34, 705, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx676 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.005 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0237333100 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1188308 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002960 · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, Profile likelihood-based analyses of infectious disease models, Stat Methods Med Res, 27, 1979, 10.1177/0962280217746444 · DOI
- Van Der Merwe R (2004) Sigma-point Kalman filters for probabilistic inference in dynamic state-space models. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, OGI School of Science & Engineering, OHSU
- 2019, Assessment of GFP Tag Position on Protein Localization and Growth Fitness in Yeast, J Mol Biol, 431, 636, 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature13319 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90234-1 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gks1310 · DOI
- 10.1182/BLOOD.V97.8.2230. · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1200161109 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.coi.2015.01.012 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Adlung, L., Stapor, P., Tönsing, C., Schmiester, L., Schwarzmüller, L. E., Wang, D., Timmer, J., Klingmüller, U., Hasenauer, J., & Schilling, M.
- Affiliations
- German Cancer Research Center (DE)
- Helmholtz Munich (DE)
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- University of Bonn (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Timmer, Jens
- Klingmüller, Ursula
- Hasenauer, Jan
- Schilling, Marcel
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell Reports
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2019-12-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 109507-109507
- ISSN
- 2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3189838849
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Site cant be reached (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
- European Commission
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (INST35/1134-1 FUGG)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (031L0042, 031L0074B, 0316182B, 01KU1902B, EXC-2189, 390939984, 031L0048, 031L0074A, 0316182A, 01KU1902A)
- Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg
- Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie
- Horizon 2020 (686282)
- National Cancer Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
- Keywords
- JAK2/STAT5 signaling, erythroid progenitor cells, CFU-E, erythropoietin, cell-to-cell variability, single-cell model, graded response, apoptosis, nuclear import, cytoplasmic volume, SHP-1, EPO receptor, switch-like behavior
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Calibration, Cell Nucleus, Cell Survival, Cells, Cultured, Computer Simulation, Cytoplasm, Erythropoietin, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Models, Biological, Phosphorylation, Signal Transduction, Erythroid Precursor Cells, STAT5 Transcription Factor, Mice, Janus Kinase 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review