PreprintCited by 21Cytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsGene Regulatory Network AnalysisErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cell-to-cell variability in JAK2/STAT5 pathway components and cytoplasmic volumes define survival threshold in erythroid progenitor cells

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109507

Abstract

Summary: Survival or apoptosis is a binary decision in individual cells. Yet, at the cell population level, a graded increase in survival of CFU-E cells is observed upon stimulation with Erythropoietin (Epo). To identify components of JAK2/STAT5 signal transduction that contribute to the graded population response, a cell population-level model calibrated with experimental data was extended to study the behavior in single cells. The single-cell model showed that the high cell-to-cell variability in nuclear phosphorylated STAT5 is caused by variability in the amount of EpoR:JAK2 complexes and of SHP1 as well as the extent of nuclear import due to the large variance in the cytoplasmic volume of CFU-E cells. 24 to 118 pSTAT5 molecules in the nucleus for 120 min are sufficient to ensure cell survival. Thus, variability in membrane-associated processes are responsible to convert a switch-like behavior at the single-cell level to a graded population level response. Highlights: Mathematical modeling enables integration of heterogeneous data Single-cell modeling captures binary decision process Multiple sources of cell-to-cell variability in erythroid progenitor cells Minimal amount of active STAT5 sufficient for survival of erythroid progenitor cells

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/866871

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control

    Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · cited 2×

    “More importantly, since it has been shown that the correlation between mRNA expression levels and protein abundance is low (Schwanhausser et al, 2011) and intracellular information processing, which links e.g. changes in ligand concentration to cell fate decisions, is executed by complex non-linear…”
    Background

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 83

  1. 10.15252/msb.20167258 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/msb.2011.50 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr370 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.018 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1126/science.1184913 · DOI
  6. 2018, Erythroleukemia-historical perspectives and recent advances in diagnosis and management, Blood Rev, 32, 96, 10.1016/j.blre.2017.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/nbt.2317 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2014, Identification of isoform-specific dynamics in phosphorylation-dependent STAT5 dimerization by quantitative mass spectrometry and mathematical modeling, J Proteome Res, 13, 5685, 10.1021/pr5006923 · DOI
  9. Bressloff PC (2014) Stochastic processes in cell biology, Cham: Springer. · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nbt.3102 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 2015, Mathematical modelling of fluid transport and its regulation at multiple scales, Biosystems, 130, 1, 10.1016/j.biosystems.2015.02.004 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.025 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.71.5.1677 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/nrg3484 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1038/nbt.2038 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210421 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1073/pnas.1611428114 · DOI
  18. 2018, Multi-experiment nonlinear mixed effect modeling of single-cell translation kinetics after transfection, NPJ Syst Biol Appl, 5, 1
  19. 2017, Parameter estimation for dynamical systems with discrete events and logical operations, Bioinformatics, 33, 1049, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw764 · DOI
  20. Gilitschenski I , Hanebeck UD (2013). Efficient deterministic dirac mixture approximation of Gaussian distributions. American Control Conference (ACC’13), Washington, DC/USA, June 17-19, 2013; IEEE, Piscataway (NJ).
  21. 1996, Identification of tyrosine residues within the intracellular domain of the erythropoietin receptor crucial for STAT5 activation, EMBO J, 15, 2434, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00601.x · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.017 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 1995, Prolactin, growth hormone, erythropoietin and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor induce MGF-Stat5 DNA binding activity, EMBO J, 14, 2005, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07192.x · DOI
  24. 10.1038/nmeth.3971 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1021/pr3007232 · DOI
  26. Hanebeck UD , Klumpp V (2008). Localized Cumulative Distributions and a multivariate generalization of the Cramér-von Mises distance. IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems; Seoul.
  27. 2017, Mathematical model of early Reelin-induced Src family kinase-mediated signaling, PLoS One, 12, e0186927, 10.1371/journal.pone.0186927 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/ncb2864 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/ni0706-681 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1145/1089014.1089020 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl485 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 2016, Modeling Cellular Noise Underlying Heterogeneous Cell Responses in the Epidermal Growth Factor Signaling Pathway, PLoS Comput Biol, 12, e1005222, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005222 · DOI
  33. 10.1186/s12918-015-0203-x · DOI
  34. 1993, Survival or death of individual proerythroblasts results from differing erythropoietin sensitivities: a mechanism for controlled rates of erythrocyte production, Blood, 82, 2340, 10.1182/blood.V82.8.2340.2340 · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8324 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/978-1-4939-2095-2_3 · DOI
  37. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm397 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1038/nbt.1558 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 2018, A Hierarchical, Data-Driven Approach to Modeling Single-Cell Populations Predicts Latent Causes of Cell-To-Cell Variability, Cell Syst, 6, 593, 10.1016/j.cels.2018.04.008 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/bit.260180604 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 2016, Driving the Model to Its Limit: Profile Likelihood Based Model Reduction, PLoS One, 11, e0162366, 10.1371/journal.pone.0162366 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.015 · DOI
  43. 2016, Identification of Cell Type-Specific Differences in Erythropoietin Receptor Signaling in Primary Erythroid and Lung Cancer Cells, PLoS Comput Biol, 12, e1005049, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005049 · DOI
  44. 2012, Update for the logicle data scale including operational code implementations, Cytometry A, 81, 273
  45. 10.1016/S0968-0004(03)00091-4 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1126/science.1231456 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.09.015 · DOI
  48. 10.1083/jcb.96.2.386 · DOI
  49. 1984, Cell kinetic behaviour of a synchronized population of erythroid precursor cells in vitro, Cell Tissue Kinet, 17, 629
  50. 10.1002/cyto.a.20258 · DOI
  51. 10.1073/pnas.0913798107 · DOI
  52. 10.1126/science.1222161 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/nri1416 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1007/BF00140873 · DOI
  55. Pop R , Shearstone JR , Shen Q , Liu Y , Hallstrom K , Koulnis M , Gribnau J , Socolovsky M (2010) A key commitment step in erythropoiesis is synchronized with the cell cycle clock through mutual inhibition between PU.1 and S-phase progression. PLoS Biol 8 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 1985, History of the BALB/c family, Curr Top Microbiol Immunol, 122, 1
  57. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.050 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1063/1.3528102 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp358 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1371/journal.pone.0074335 · DOI
  61. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv405 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.01.007 · DOI
  63. 10.1074/jbc.M003456200 · DOI
  64. 1978, Estimating the dimension of a model, Ann Statist, 6, 461, 10.1214/aos/1176344136 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.11.016 · DOI
  66. 10.1038/nature08282 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81013-2 · DOI
  68. 10.1182/blood.V98.12.3261 · DOI
  69. 10.1038/nature08012 · DOI
  70. 2018, PESTO: Parameter EStimation TOolbox, Bioinformatics, 34, 705, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx676 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.005 · DOI
  72. 10.1073/pnas.0237333100 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1126/science.1188308 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002960 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 2018, Profile likelihood-based analyses of infectious disease models, Stat Methods Med Res, 27, 1979, 10.1177/0962280217746444 · DOI
  76. Van Der Merwe R (2004) Sigma-point Kalman filters for probabilistic inference in dynamic state-space models. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, OGI School of Science & Engineering, OHSU
  77. 2019, Assessment of GFP Tag Position on Protein Localization and Growth Fitness in Yeast, J Mol Biol, 431, 636, 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.12.004 · DOI
  78. 10.1038/nature13319 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90234-1 · DOI
  80. 10.1093/nar/gks1310 · DOI
  81. 10.1182/BLOOD.V97.8.2230. · DOI
  82. 10.1073/pnas.1200161109 · DOI
  83. 10.1016/j.coi.2015.01.012 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Adlung, L., Stapor, P., Tönsing, C., Schmiester, L., Schwarzmüller, L. E., Wang, D., Timmer, J., Klingmüller, U., Hasenauer, J., & Schilling, M.
Affiliations
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • University of Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Timmer, Jens
  • Klingmüller, Ursula
  • Hasenauer, Jan
  • Schilling, Marcel
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2019-12-06
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
109507-109507
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3189838849
Cited by
21
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
  • European Commission
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (INST35/1134-1 FUGG)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (031L0042, 031L0074B, 0316182B, 01KU1902B, EXC-2189, 390939984, 031L0048, 031L0074A, 0316182A, 01KU1902A)
  • Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg
  • Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie
  • Horizon 2020 (686282)
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Keywords
JAK2/STAT5 signaling, erythroid progenitor cells, CFU-E, erythropoietin, cell-to-cell variability, single-cell model, graded response, apoptosis, nuclear import, cytoplasmic volume, SHP-1, EPO receptor, switch-like behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Calibration, Cell Nucleus, Cell Survival, Cells, Cultured, Computer Simulation, Cytoplasm, Erythropoietin, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Models, Biological, Phosphorylation, Signal Transduction, Erythroid Precursor Cells, STAT5 Transcription Factor, Mice, Janus Kinase 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review