The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in signaling in vertebrate regeneration as a prelude to regenerative medicine
Open accessAbstract
While all animals have evolved strategies to respond to injury and disease, their ability to functionally recover from loss of or damage to organs or appendages varies widely damage to skeletal muscle, but, unlike amphibians and fish, they fail to regenerate heart, lens, retina, or appendages. The relatively young field of regenerative medicine strives to develop therapies aimed at improving regenerative processes in humans and is predicated on >40 years of success with bone marrow transplants. Further progress will be accelerated by implementing knowledge about the molecular mechanisms that regulate regenerative processes in model organisms that naturally possess the ability to regenerate organs and/or appendages. In this review we summarize the current knowledge about the signaling pathways that regulate regeneration of amphibian and fish appendages, fish heart, and mammalian liver and skeletal muscle. While the cellular mechanisms and the cell types involved in regeneration of these systems vary widely, it is evident that shared signals are involved in tissue regeneration. Signals provided by the immune system appear to act as triggers of many regenerative processes. Subsequently, pathways that are best known for their importance in regulating embryonic development, in particular fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and Wnt/β-catenin signaling (as well as others), are required for progenitor cell formation or activation and for cell proliferation and specification leading to tissue regrowth. Experimental activation of these pathways or interference with signals that inhibit regenerative processes can augment or even trigger regeneration in certain contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regulation of skeletal muscle mass in mice by a new TGF-p superfamily member
McPherron, A. C., Lawler, A. M., & Lee, S.-J. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387083a0 · Cited by 4,013
Rejuvenation of aged progenitor cells by exposure to a young systemic environment
Conboy, I. M., Conboy, M. J., Wagers, A. J., Girma, E. R., Weissman, I. L., & Rando, T. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03260 · Cited by 2,287
Liver regeneration: from myth to mechanism
Taub, R. (2004) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1489 · Cited by 1,567
Musarò, A., McCullagh, K., Paul, A., Houghton, L., Dobrowolny, G., Molinaro, M., Barton, E. R., L Sweeney, H., & Rosenthal, N. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/84839 · Cited by 1,137 · cited 2×
“While loss-of-function evidence for an in vivo requirement of IGF signaling in muscle regeneration is not available, targeted overexpression of IGF in muscle has spectacular beneficial effects on regeneration after injury, muscle degeneration in muscular dystrophy mdx model mice, and on agerelated muscular atrophy and…”
BackgroundNotch-Mediated Restoration of Regenerative Potential to Aged Muscle
Conboy, I. M., Conboy, M. J., Smythe, G. M., & Rando, T. A. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1087573 · Cited by 1,121
Functional improvement of dystrophic muscle by myostatin blockade
Bogdanovich, S., Krag, T. O. B., Barton, E. R., Morris, L. D., Whittemore, L.-A., Ahima, R. S., & Khurana, T. S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01154 · Cited by 831
Myostatin negatively regulates satellite cell activation and self-renewal
McCroskery, S., Thomas, M., Maxwell, L., Sharma, M., & Kambadur, R. (2003) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200207056 · Cited by 784
Huh, C.-G., Factor, V. M., Sánchez, A., Uchida, K., Conner, E. A., & Thorgeirsson, S. S. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0306068101 · Cited by 750
Liver regeneration and repair: Hepatocytes, progenitor cells, and stem cells
Fausto, N. (2004) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.20214 · Cited by 720
The proinflammatory mediators C3a and C5a are essential for liver regeneration
Strey, C. W., Markiewski, M., Mastellos, D., Tudoran, R., Spruce, L. A., Greenbaum, L. E., & Lambris, J. D. (2003) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20030374 · Cited by 436
Cited by
Type 2 Innate Signals Stimulate Fibro/Adipogenic Progenitors to Facilitate Muscle Regeneration
Heredia, J. E., Mukundan, L., Chen, F. M., Mueller, A. A., Deo, R. C., Locksley, R. M., Rando, T. A., & Chawla, A. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.053 · Cited by 818
Palacios, D., Mozzetta, C., Consalvi, S., Caretti, G., Saccone, V., Proserpio, V., Marquez, V. E., Valente, S., Mai, A., Forcales, S. V., et al. (2010) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2010.08.013 · Cited by 392
Macrophages modulate adult zebrafish tail fin regeneration
Petrie, T. A., Strand, N. S., Tsung-Yang, C., Rabinowitz, J. S., & Moon, R. T. (2014) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.098459 · Cited by 365
Self-citationRegenerative Growth in Drosophila Imaginal Discs Is Regulated by Wingless and Myc
Smith-Bolton, R. K., Worley, M. I., Kanda, H., & Hariharan, I. K. (2009) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2009.04.015 · Cited by 288
Mitotic and mitogenic Wnt signalling
Niehrs, C., & Acebron, S. P. (2012) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.124 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Stoick-Cooper, C. L., Moon, R. T., & Weidinger, G.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1292-1315
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- OpenAlex
- W2133246987
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 13
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in signaling in vertebrate regeneration as a prelude to regenerative medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.1540507
- The paper
- Stoick-Cooper, C. L., Moon, R. T., & Weidinger, G. (2007). Advances in signaling in vertebrate regeneration as a prelude to regenerative medicine. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1540507
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
