The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mutations in the Drosophila dTAK1 gene reveal a conserved function for MAPKKKs in the control of rel/NF-κB-dependent innate immune responses
Open accessAbstract
In mammals, TAK1, a MAPKKK kinase, is implicated in multiple signaling processes, including the regulation of NF-κB activity via the IL1-R/TLR pathways. TAK1 function has largely been studied in cultured cells, and its in vivo function is not fully understood. We have isolated null mutations in the Drosophila dTAK1 gene that encodes dTAK1, a homolog of TAK1. dTAK1 mutant flies are viable and fertile, but they do not produce antibacterial peptides and are highly susceptible to Gram-negative bacterial infection. This phenotype is similar to the phenotypes generated by mutations in components of the Drosophila Imd pathway. Our genetic studies also indicate that dTAK1 functions downstream of the Imd protein and upstream of the IKK complex in the Imd pathway that controls the Rel/NF-κB like transactivator Relish. In addition, our epistatic analysis places the caspase, Dredd, downstream of the IKK complex, which supports the idea that Relish is processed and activated by a caspase activity. Our genetic demonstration of dTAK1 's role in the regulation of Drosophila antimicrobial peptide gene expression suggests an evolutionary conserved role for TAK1 in the activation of Rel/NF-κB-mediated host defense reactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A CONSERVED SIGNALING PATHWAY: The Drosophila Toll-Dorsal Pathway
Belvin, M. P., & Anderson, K. V. (1996) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.393 · Cited by 836 · cited 1×
“…analysis combining a Toll gain-of-function mutation that constitutively activates the Toll pathway and lossof-function mutations in other genes was a powerful tool for establishing the order of action of the genes encoding components of the Toll pathway (for review, see Belvin and Anderson 1996).”
MethodIshitani, T., Ninomiya-Tsuji, J., Nagai, S.-I., Nishita, M., Meneghini, M., Barker, N., Waterman, M., Bowerman, B., Clevers, H., Shibuya, H., et al. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/21674 · Cited by 621
Cited by
Takeda, K., Kaisho, T., & Akira, S. (2003) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141126 · Cited by 6,143
Toll-like receptors and innate immunity
Medzhitov, R. (2001) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/35100529 · Cited by 4,308
The immune response of Drosophila
Hoffmann, J. A. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02021 · Cited by 1,553
Ubiquitin signalling in the NF-κB pathway
Chen, Z. J. (2005) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb0805-758 · Cited by 1,184
Matsuzawa, A., Saegusa, K., Noguchi, T., Sadamitsu, C., Nishitoh, H., Nagai, S., Koyasu, S., Matsumoto, K., Takeda, K., & Ichijo, H. (2005) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1200 · Cited by 667
Functional Dissection of an Innate Immune Response by a Genome-Wide RNAi Screen
Foley, E., & O'Farrell, P. H. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020203 · Cited by 238
Interaction Between Sleep and the Immune Response in Drosophila: A Role for the NFκB Relish
Williams, J. A., Sathyanarayanan, S., Hendricks, J. C., & Sehgal, A. (2007) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/30.4.389 · Cited by 126
Drosophila nemo is an essential gene involved in the regulation of programmed cell death
Mirkovic, I., Charish, K., Gorski, S. M., McKnight, K., & Verheyen, E. M. (2002) · Mechanisms of Development · doi:10.1016/s0925-4773(02)00289-7 · Cited by 51
Zhuang, Z.-H., Zhou, Y., Yu, M.-C., Silverman, N., & Ge, B.-X. (2006) · Cellular Signalling · doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.05.013 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Vidal, S., Khush, R. S., Leulier, F., Tzou, P., Nakamura, M., & Lemaitre, B.
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2001-08-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1900-1912
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- OpenAlex
- W2169057762
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.