Cited by 239Invertebrate Immune Response MechanismsImmune Response and InflammationNF-κB Signaling Pathways

Functional Dissection of an Innate Immune Response by a Genome-Wide RNAi Screen

Open access
Foley, Edan, O'Farrell, Patrick H·2004·PLoS Biology

Abstract

The innate immune system is ancient and highly conserved. It is the first line of defense and the only recognizable immune system in the vast majority of metazoans. Signaling events that convert pathogen detection into a defense response are central to innate immunity. Drosophila has emerged as an invaluable model organism for studying this regulation. Activation of the NF-kappaB family member Relish by the caspase-8 homolog Dredd is a central, but still poorly understood, signaling module in the response to gram-negative bacteria. To identify the genes contributing to this regulation, we produced double-stranded RNAs corresponding to the conserved genes in the Drosophila genome and used this resource in genome-wide RNA interference screens. We identified numerous inhibitors and activators of immune reporters in a cell culture model. Epistatic interactions and phenotypes defined a hierarchy of gene action and demonstrated that the conserved gene sickie is required for activation of Relish. We also showed that a second gene, defense repressor 1, encodes a product with characteristics of an inhibitor of apoptosis protein that inhibits the Dredd caspase to maintain quiescence of the signaling pathway. Molecular analysis revealed that Defense repressor 1 is upregulated by Dredd in a feedback loop. We propose that interruption of this feedback loop contributes to signal transduction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020203

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nicolas E Reichhart JM Hoffmann JA Lemaitre B In vivo regulation of the IkappaB homologue cactus during the immune response of Drosophila J Biol Chem 1998 273 10463 10469 9553105

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foley, E., & O'Farrell, P. H.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2004-06-22
Volume
2
Issue
8
Pages
e203
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W1994557554
Cited by
238
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 60988, R01GM060988)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
Keywords
innate immunity, Drosophila, Relish, caspase-8, NF-κB signaling, Gram-negative bacteria, inhibitor of apoptosis proteins, feedback loops, epistasis, immune gene regulation, RNAi screen
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, beta-Galactosidase, Cell Line, Drosophila, Epistasis, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Immunity, Innate, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Models, Biological, Models, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Data, Phenotype, RNA, Double-Stranded, Transcription Factors, Blotting, Western, Signal Transduction, Gene Library, Up-Regulation, NF-kappa B, Genome, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Genes, Reporter, Insect Proteins, Caspases, Drosophila Proteins, RNA Interference, Caspase 8

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review