Cited by 1,520

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cancer stem cells in glioblastoma

Lathia, Justin D., Mack, Stephen C., Mulkearns-Hubert, Erin E., Valentim, Claudia L.L., Rich, Jeremy N.·2015·Genes & Development

Abstract

Tissues with defined cellular hierarchies in development and homeostasis give rise to tumors with cellular hierarchies, suggesting that tumors recapitulate specific tissues and mimic their origins. Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent and malignant primary brain tumor and contains self-renewing, tumorigenic cancer stem cells (CSCs) that contribute to tumor initiation and therapeutic resistance. As normal stem and progenitor cells participate in tissue development and repair, these developmental programs re-emerge in CSCs to support the development and progressive growth of tumors. Elucidation of the molecular mechanisms that govern CSCs has informed the development of novel targeted therapeutics for GBM and other brain cancers. CSCs are not self-autonomous units; rather, they function within an ecological system, both actively remodeling the microenvironment and receiving critical maintenance cues from their niches. To fulfill the future goal of developing novel therapies to collapse CSC dynamics, drawing parallels to other normal and pathological states that are highly interactive with their microenvironments and that use developmental signaling pathways will be beneficial.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.261982.115

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Functional criteria of CSCs. CSCs are defined by functional characteristics that include sustained self-renewal, persistent proliferation, and tumor initiation upon secondary transplantation, which is the definitive functional CSC assay. CSCs also share features with somatic stem cells, including frequency within a tissue (or tumor), stem cell marker expression (examples relevant to GBM and the brain are provided), and the ability to generate progeny of multiple lineages.
Figure 1. Functional criteria of CSCs. CSCs are defined by functional characteristics that include sustained self-renewal, persistent proliferation, and tumor initiation upon secondary transplantation, which is the definitive functional CSC assay. CSCs also share features with somatic stem cells, including frequency within a tissue (or tumor), stem cell marker expression (examples relevant to GBM and the brain are provided), and the ability to generate progeny of multiple lineages.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 2. Regulation of CSCs. Cell-autonomous (intrinsic) and external (extrinsic) forces regulate the CSC state. Key intrinsic regulators include genetic, epigenetic, and metabolic regulation, while extrinsic regulators include interaction with the microenvironment, including niche factors and the immune system.
Figure 2. Regulation of CSCs. Cell-autonomous (intrinsic) and external (extrinsic) forces regulate the CSC state. Key intrinsic regulators include genetic, epigenetic, and metabolic regulation, while extrinsic regulators include interaction with the microenvironment, including niche factors and the immune system.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 3. Proposed features of CSCs. Non-cell-autonomous aspects of CSCs may drive tumor growth but also serve as points of fragility. These include the increased ability to invade through the brain parenchyma, immune evasion, relationship with a niche, and promotion of angiogenesis.
Figure 3. Proposed features of CSCs. Non-cell-autonomous aspects of CSCs may drive tumor growth but also serve as points of fragility. These include the increased ability to invade through the brain parenchyma, immune evasion, relationship with a niche, and promotion of angiogenesis.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 135

  1. 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.10.023 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/cdd.2014.31 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/neuonc/nou027 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nature05236 · DOI
  5. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1010 · DOI
  6. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1079 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2007, Cyclopamine-mediated hedgehog pathway inhibition depletes stem-like cancer cells in glioblastoma, Stem Cells, 10, 2524
  8. 10.1186/1748-717X-8-65 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.stem.2010.11.016 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.11.021 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4180 · DOI
  12. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6878 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/ng.127 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/s12032-014-0985-5 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.08.001 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.11.005 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nrm3625 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.stem.2009.01.007 · DOI
  19. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0153 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/nm0797-730 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/stem.582 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.08.032 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.chom.2008.02.003 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.11.020 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.07.012 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/nature06965 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.stem.2010.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002337 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.021 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.11.033 · DOI
  31. 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0121 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2013.12.004 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.01.007 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/neuonc/nop027 · DOI
  35. 10.1586/erv.11.177 · DOI
  36. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2730 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210359 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/nm.2415 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.006 · DOI
  40. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0858 · DOI
  41. 2010, NOTCH pathway blockade depletes CD133-positive glioblastoma cells and inhibits growth of tumor neurospheres and xenografts, Stem Cells, 28, 5, 10.1002/stem.254 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/stem.1730 · DOI
  43. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3773 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/nn.3510 · DOI
  45. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1364 · DOI
  46. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-1881 · DOI
  47. 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0493 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.03.030 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1038/nature09587 · DOI
  50. 10.1093/brain/awt025 · DOI
  51. 10.1084/jem.183.4.1797 · DOI
  52. 10.1097/nen.0b013e31802d9000 · DOI
  53. 10.4161/cc.8.20.9701 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1038/cdd.2011.109 · DOI
  55. 10.1073/pnas.2036535100 · DOI
  56. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000319 · DOI
  57. 10.1038/cdd.2010.150 · DOI
  58. 10.1002/glia.10094 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.stem.2009.08.018 · DOI
  60. 10.1101/gad.1668708 · DOI
  61. 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2012-3828 · DOI
  62. 10.1002/stem.1358 · DOI
  63. 10.1002/stem.1554 · DOI
  64. 10.1007/s00401-013-1173-y · DOI
  65. 10.1215/S1152851704001115 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1820 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.010 · DOI
  68. 10.1101/gad.193565.112 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.04.008 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.12.006 · DOI
  71. 10.1073/pnas.0307618100 · DOI
  72. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1693 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/j.stem.2010.02.018 · DOI
  74. 10.1007/s12015-010-9194-6 · DOI
  75. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.029 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.03.030 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.12.005 · DOI
  78. 10.1074/jbc.R900013200 · DOI
  79. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.01.009 · DOI
  80. 10.1186/1476-4598-5-67 · DOI
  81. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1707 · DOI
  82. 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.12.006 · DOI
  83. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.055 · DOI
  84. 10.1038/nature12624 · DOI
  85. 10.1073/pnas.1320611111 · DOI
  86. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2009.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
  87. 10.1038/431899a · DOI
  88. 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.03.017 · DOI · Paper page
  89. 10.1227/01.neu.0000316019.28421.95 · DOI
  90. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00200.x · DOI
  91. 10.1016/j.stem.2011.04.007 · DOI
  92. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2048 · DOI
  93. 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.02.019 · DOI
  94. 10.1007/s00262-012-1319-0 · DOI
  95. 10.1038/nature05349 · DOI
  96. 10.1002/1097-0029(20010215)52:4<401::AID-JEMT1025>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI
  97. 10.1016/j.stem.2009.03.014 · DOI · Paper page
  98. 10.1038/cdd.2011.95 · DOI · Paper page
  99. 10.1038/nri3265 · DOI
  100. 10.1093/neuonc/nou212 · DOI
  101. 10.1038/35102167 · DOI · Paper page
  102. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.021 · DOI
  103. 10.1038/nature09611 · DOI
  104. 10.1038/nn.3597 · DOI
  105. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2004.04.007 · DOI
  106. 2009, STAT3 is required for proliferation and maintenance of multipotency in glioblastoma stem cells, Stem Cells, 10, 2383
  107. 2003, Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors, Cancer Res, 63, 5821
  108. 10.1038/nature03128 · DOI
  109. 10.1016/j.stem.2009.03.003 · DOI
  110. 10.1073/pnas.1219747110 · DOI · Paper page
  111. 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7 · DOI
  112. 10.1371/journal.pone.0005498 · DOI
  113. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.030 · DOI
  114. 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.7499 · DOI
  115. 10.1186/1476-4598-3-25 · DOI
  116. 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14720 · DOI
  117. 10.1002/glia.21185 · DOI
  118. 10.1038/cdd.2013.136 · DOI
  119. 2013, Transcription factors FOXG1 and Groucho/TLE promote glioblastoma growth, Nat Commun, 4, 2956, 10.1038/ncomms3956 · DOI
  120. 10.1073/pnas.1106704108 · DOI
  121. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003769 · DOI
  122. 10.1002/stem.188 · DOI
  123. 2010, Notch promotes radioresistance of glioma stem cells, Stem Cells, 28, 17, 10.1002/stem.261 · DOI
  124. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1983 · DOI
  125. 10.1073/pnas.1217002110 · DOI
  126. 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70168-2 · DOI
  127. 10.1093/neuonc/noq082 · DOI
  128. 10.1016/j.stem.2009.11.002 · DOI
  129. 10.1038/nn.3960 · DOI
  130. 10.1002/stem.102 · DOI
  131. 10.1101/gad.235515.113 · DOI
  132. 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.02.010 · DOI
  133. 10.1038/emboj.2010.137 · DOI
  134. 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.03.020 · DOI
  135. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4269 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,520

Metadata

Authors
Lathia, J. D., Mack, S. C., Mulkearns-Hubert, E. E., Valentim, C. L. L., & Rich, J. N.
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2015-06-15
Volume
29
Issue
12
Pages
1203-1217
ISSN
  • 0890-9369
  • 1549-5477
Cited by
1,520
References
13
Language
en
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CA154130, CA171652, CA169117, NS087913, NS089272, CA157948, NS083629)
  • Sontag Foundation
  • Cleveland Clinic
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Lerner Research Institute
  • Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • Voices Against Brain Cancer
  • Blast GBM
  • Ohio Cancer Research Associates
  • American Cancer Society (V Scholar Award)
  • V Foundation for Cancer Research (IRG-91-022-18)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review