PreprintCited by 184Genome Rearrangement AlgorithmsChromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

Breakpoint regions and homologous synteny blocks in chromosomes have different evolutionary histories

Open access
Larkin, Denis M., Pape, Greg, Donthu, Ravikiran, Auvil, Loretta, Welge, Michael, Lewin, Harris A.·2009·Genome Research

Abstract

The persistence of large blocks of homologous synteny and a high frequency of breakpoint reuse are distinctive features of mammalian chromosomes that are not well understood in evolutionary terms. To gain a better understanding of the evolutionary forces that affect genome architecture, synteny relationships among 10 amniotes (human, chimp, macaque, rat, mouse, pig, cattle, dog, opossum, and chicken) were compared at <1 human-Mbp resolution. Homologous synteny blocks (HSBs; N = 2233) and chromosome evolutionary breakpoint regions (EBRs; N = 1064) were identified from pairwise comparisons of all genomes. Analysis of the size distribution of HSBs shared in all 10 species' chromosomes (msHSBs) identified three (>20 Mbp) that are larger than expected by chance. Gene network analysis of msHSBs >3 human-Mbp and EBRs <1 Mbp demonstrated that msHSBs are significantly enriched for genes involved in development of the central nervous and other organ systems, whereas EBRs are enriched for genes associated with adaptive functions. In addition, we found EBRs are significantly enriched for structural variations (segmental duplications, copy number variants, and indels), retrotransposed and zinc finger genes, and single nucleotide polymorphisms. These results demonstrate that chromosome breakage in evolution is nonrandom and that HSBs and EBRs are evolving in distinctly different ways. We suggest that natural selection acts on the genome to maintain combinations of genes and their regulatory elements that are essential to fundamental processes of amniote development and biological organization. Furthermore, EBRs may be used extensively to generate new genetic variation and novel combinations of genes and regulatory elements that contribute to adaptive phenotypes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.086546.108

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using the human genome as an outgroup, 207 conserved ancestral homologous synteny blocks (aHSBs) were reconstructed, covering 2.51 Gb (94%) of the yak genome.

    “Using the human genome as an outgroup, we reconstructed 207 conserved ancestral homologous synteny blocks (aHSBs) 16 covering 2.51 Gb (94%) of the yak genome.”

    From The yak genome and adaptation to life at high altitude (2012) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Identification of HSBs section describes defining homologous synteny blocks using the human genome as a reference, supporting the methodological connection. It does not describe human as an outgroup or report 207 ancestral blocks covering 2.51 Gb (94%) of a yak genome; yak is not among the genomes analyzed. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Larkin, D. M., Pape, G., Donthu, R., Auvil, L., Welge, M., & Lewin, H. A.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2009-04-02
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
770-777
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108876013
Cited by
184
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 13
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RVC Research Online (Royal Veterinary College) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
structural variants, segmental duplication, copy number variation, retrotransposition, zinc finger genes, single nucleotide polymorphisms, gene network analysis, adaptive evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Models, Genetic, Selection, Genetic, Genome, Evolution, Molecular, Chromosome Breakage, Gene Duplication, Synteny, Chromosomes, Mammalian

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review