Cited by 564Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA MethylationChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

Epigenetic signatures distinguish multiple classes of enhancers with distinct cellular functions

Open access
Zentner, Gabriel E., Tesar, Paul J., Scacheri, Peter C.·2011·Genome Research

Abstract

Epigenetic regulation of gene enhancer elements is important for establishing and maintaining the identity of cells. Gene enhancer elements are thought to exist in either active or poised states distinguishable by chromatin features, but a complete understanding of the regulation of enhancers is lacking. Here, by using mouse embryonic stem cells and their differentiated derivatives, as well as terminally differentiated cells, we report the coexistence of multiple, defined classes of enhancers that serve distinct cellular functions. Specifically, we found that active enhancers can be subclassified based on varying levels of H3K4me1, H3K27ac, and H3K36me3 and the pSer2/5 forms of RNA polymerase II. The abundance of these histone modifications positively correlates with the expression of associated genes and cellular functions consistent with the identity of the cell type. Poised enhancers can also be subclassified based on presence or absence of H3K27me3 and H3K9me3, conservation, genomic location, expression levels of associated genes, and predicted function of associated genes. These findings not only refine the repertoire of histone modifications at both active and poised gene enhancer elements but also raise the possibility that enhancers associated with distinct cellular functions are partitioned based on specific combinations of histone modifications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.122382.111

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • H3K4me1, associated with the binding of Trithorax/MLL complexes, is taken to be the hallmark of both primed and active enhancers, whilst active enhancers additionally tend to associate with H3K27ac.

    “Currently mono-methylation of histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4me1), associated with the binding of Trithorax/MLL complexes, is taken to be the hallmark of both ‘primed’ and active enhancers, whilst active enhancers additionally tend to associate with the acetylation of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27ac) [133–137].”

    From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [136]

    The section ‘Identification of three major enhancer classes in mESCs’ (page not available) classifies H3K4me1-positive, H3K27ac-positive enhancers as active and H3K4me1-positive, H3K27me3-positive enhancers as poised, supporting the histone-mark distinction. Our copy does not establish the claimed association with Trithorax/MLL complexes, and it uses ‘poised’ rather than ‘primed.’ (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Enhancers can reside in a poised state exhibiting both H3K4me1 and H3K27me3 that is associated with Polycomb repressive complexes.

    “In addition to the ‘primed’ and active states, enhancers can also reside in a ‘poised’ state exhibiting both H3K4me1 and H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) that is associated with Polycomb repressive complexes [131, 135, 136, 138].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Irizarry RA, Bolstad BM, Collin F, Cope LM, Hobbs B, Speed TP. 2003. Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data. Nucleic Acids Res 31: e15. doi: 10.1093/nar/gng015. · DOI
  2. Ku M, Koche RP, Rheinbay E, Mendenhall EM, Endoh M, Mikkelsen TS, Presser A, Nusbaum C, Xie X, Chi AS, et al. 2008. Genomewide analysis of PRC1 and PRC2 occupancy identifies two classes of bivalent domains. PLoS Genet 4: e1000242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000242. · DOI
  3. Li G, Fullwood M, Xu H, Mulawadi FH, Velkov S, Vega V, Ariyaratne PN, Mohamed YB, Ooi H-S, Tennakoon C, et al. 2010. ChIA-PET tool for comprehensive chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tag sequencing. Genome Biol 11: R22. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r22. · DOI
  4. Schnetz MP, Handoko L, Akhtar-Zaidi B, Bartels CF, Pereira CF, Fisher AG, Adams DJ, Flicek P, Crawford GE, LaFramboise T, et al. 2010. CHD7 targets active gene enhancer elements to modulate ES cell-specific gene expression. PLoS Genet 6: e1001023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen. 1001023. · DOI
  5. Xi H, Shulha HP, Lin JM, Vales TR, Fu Y, Bodine DM, McKay RDG, Chenoweth JG, Tesar PJ, Furey TS, et al. 2007. Identification and characterization of cell type-specific and ubiquitous chromatin regulatory structures in the human genome. PLoS Genet 3: e136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030136. · DOI
  6. Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer C, Eeckhoute J, Johnson D, Bernstein B, Nusbaum C, Myers R, Brown M, Li W, et al. 2008. Model-based analysis of ChIP-seq (MACS). Genome Biol 9: R137. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137. 10.1101/gr.122382.111 Access the most recent version at doi: 2011 21: 1273-1283 originally published online June 1, 2011 Genome Res. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zentner, G. E., Tesar, P. J., & Scacheri, P. C.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Case Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2011-06-01
Volume
21
Issue
8
Pages
1273-1283
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167776710
Cited by
564
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 33
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R33MH087877)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG004722)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (5T32GM008614, 5T32GM008615)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD056369)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
active enhancers, poised enhancers, histone modifications, H3K4me1, H3K27ac, H3K36me3, H3K27me3, H3K9me3, RNA polymerase II phosphorylation, cell identity, mouse embryonic stem cells, cell differentiation, enhancer function
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Chromatin, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Germ Layers, Histones, DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases, Gene Expression Profiling, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mice, Embryonic Stem Cells, Neural Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review