PreprintCited by 460Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingGenomics and Rare Diseases

A cloud-compatible bioinformatics pipeline for ultrarapid pathogen identification from next-generation sequencing of clinical samples

Open access
Naccache, Samia N., Federman, Scot, Veeraraghavan, Narayanan, Zaharia, Matei, Lee, Deanna, Samayoa, Erik, Bouquet, Jerome, Greninger, Alexander L. +18 more·2014·Genome Research

Abstract

Unbiased next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches enable comprehensive pathogen detection in the clinical microbiology laboratory and have numerous applications for public health surveillance, outbreak investigation, and the diagnosis of infectious diseases. However, practical deployment of the technology is hindered by the bioinformatics challenge of analyzing results accurately and in a clinically relevant timeframe. Here we describe SURPI (“sequence-based ultrarapid pathogen identification”), a computational pipeline for pathogen identification from complex metagenomic NGS data generated from clinical samples, and demonstrate use of the pipeline in the analysis of 237 clinical samples comprising more than 1.1 billion sequences. Deployable on both cloud-based and standalone servers, SURPI leverages two state-of-the-art aligners for accelerated analyses, SNAP and RAPSearch, which are as accurate as existing bioinformatics tools but orders of magnitude faster in performance. In fast mode, SURPI detects viruses and bacteria by scanning data sets of 7–500 million reads in 11 min to 5 h, while in comprehensive mode, all known microorganisms are identified, followed by de novo assembly and protein homology searches for divergent viruses in 50 min to 16 h. SURPI has also directly contributed to real-time microbial diagnosis in acutely ill patients, underscoring its potential key role in the development of unbiased NGS-based clinical assays in infectious diseases that demand rapid turnaround times.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.171934.113

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A single mNGS assay can in principle detect almost every pathogen type-viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites.

    “In principle, nearly all pathogens, including viruses, bacteria, fungi and parasites, can be identified in a single assay56.”

    From Clinical metagenomics (2019) · cites this paper as [56]

  • Customized bioinformatics pipelines for clinical mNGS data still require highly trained programming staff to develop, validate and maintain for clinical use.

    “Thus, customized bioinformatics pipelines for analysis of clinical mNGS data56,109–111 still require highly trained programming staff to develop, validate and maintain the pipeline for clinical use.”

    From Clinical metagenomics (2019) · cites this paper as [56]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naccache, S. N., Federman, S., Veeraraghavan, N., Zaharia, M., Lee, D., Samayoa, E., Bouquet, J., Greninger, A. L., Luk, K.-C., Enge, B., Wadford, D. A., Messenger, S. L., Genrich, G. L., Pellegrino, K., Grard, G., Leroy, E., Schneider, B. S., Fair, J. N., Martínez, M. A., Isa, P., Crump, J. A., DeRisi, J. L., Sittler, T., Hackett, J., Miller, S., & Chiu, C. Y.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Abbott (United States) (US)
  • California Department of Public Health (US)
  • Centre International de Recherches Médicales de Franceville (GA)
  • Metabiota (United States) (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Chiu, Charles Y.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2014-06-04
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
1180-1192
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137662380
Cited by
460
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 6
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Defense Threat Reduction Agency
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL105704)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007618)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
pathogen identification, metagenomics, clinical microbiology, cloud computing, bioinformatics pipeline, virus detection, bacterial detection, de novo assembly, protein homology search, infectious disease diagnosis, outbreak investigation
MeSH terms
Humans, ROC Curve, Software, Reproducibility of Results, Computational Biology, Databases, Nucleic Acid, Metagenomics, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review