Cited by 558Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesViral Infections and Outbreaks ResearchBiosensors and Analytical Detection

Rapid metagenomic identification of viral pathogens in clinical samples by real-time nanopore sequencing analysis

Open access
Greninger, Alexander L., Naccache, Samia N., Federman, Scot, Yu, Guixia, Mbala, Placide, Bres, Vanessa, Stryke, Doug, Bouquet, Jerome +8 more·2015·Genome Medicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We report unbiased metagenomic detection of chikungunya virus (CHIKV), Ebola virus (EBOV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) from four human blood samples by MinION nanopore sequencing coupled to a newly developed, web-based pipeline for real-time bioinformatics analysis on a computational server or laptop (MetaPORE). At titers ranging from 10(7)-10(8) copies per milliliter, reads to EBOV from two patients with acute hemorrhagic fever and CHIKV from an asymptomatic blood donor were detected within 4 to 10 min of data acquisition, while lower titer HCV virus (1 × 10(5) copies per milliliter) was detected within 40 min. Analysis of mapped nanopore reads alone, despite an average individual error rate of 24 % (range 8-49 %), permitted identification of the correct viral strain in all four isolates, and 90 % of the genome of CHIKV was recovered with 97-99 % accuracy. Using nanopore sequencing, metagenomic detection of viral pathogens directly from clinical samples was performed within an unprecedented <6 hr sample-to-answer turnaround time, and in a timeframe amenable to actionable clinical and public health diagnostics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13073-015-0220-9

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a published research study, mNGS-based detection of Ebola and chikungunya virus infections on a nanopore sequencer was possible in <10 minutes of sequencing time and <6 hours of sample-to-answer turnaround time overall.

    “In a published research study126, mNGS-based detection of Ebola and chikungunya virus infections on a nanopore sequencer was possible in <10 minutes of sequencing time and in <6 hours of sample-to-answer turnaround time overall.”

    From Clinical metagenomics (2019) · cites this paper as [126]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]The MinION(TM) Access Programme - Community - Oxford Nanopore Technologies. http://nanoporetech.com/community/the-minion-access-programme/. AccessedSeptember 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greninger, A. L., Naccache, S. N., Federman, S., Yu, G., Mbala, P., Bres, V., Stryke, D., Bouquet, J., Somasekar, S., Linnen, J. M., Dodd, R., Mulembakani, P., Schneider, B. S., Muyembe-Tamfum, J.-J., Stramer, S. L., & Chiu, C. Y.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Hologic (United States) (US)
  • American Red Cross (US)
  • Metabiota (United States) (US)
Venue
Genome Medicine
Published
2015-09-29
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
99-99
ISSN
1756-994X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140466960
Cited by
558
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 11
FWCI
24.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
  • National Institutes of Health (R01-HL105704)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
Keywords
viral metagenomics, nanopore sequencing, chikungunya virus, Ebola virus, hepatitis C virus, blood samples, hemorrhagic fever, virus detection, virus strain identification
MeSH terms
Chikungunya virus, Hepatitis C, Humans, RNA, Viral, Hepacivirus, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola, Computational Biology, Ebolavirus, Metagenomics, Nanopores, Chikungunya Fever

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review