Cited by 222CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryRNA regulation and disease

CRISPR RNAs Trigger Innate Immune Responses in Human Cells

Open access
Kim, Sojung, Koo, Taeyoung, Jee, Hyeon-Gun, Cho, Hee-Yeon, Lee, Gyeorae, Lim, Dong-Gyun, Shin, Hyoung Shik, Kim, Jin-Soo·2018·Genome Research

Abstract

Here, we report that CRISPR guide RNAs (gRNAs) with a 5′-triphosphate group (5′-ppp gRNAs) produced via in vitro transcription trigger RNA-sensing innate immune responses in human and murine cells, leading to cytotoxicity. 5′-ppp gRNAs in the cytosol are recognized by DDX58, which in turn activates type I interferon responses, causing up to ∼80% cell death. We show that the triphosphate group can be removed by a phosphatase in vitro and that the resulting 5′-hydroxyl gRNAs in complex with Cas9 or Cpf1 avoid innate immune responses and can achieve targeted mutagenesis at a frequency of 95% in primary human CD4 + T cells. These results are in line with previous findings that chemically synthesized sgRNAs with a 5′-hydroxyl group are much more efficient than in vitro–transcribed (IVT) sgRNAs in human and other mammalian cells. The phosphatase treatment of IVT sgRNAs is a cost-effective method for making highly active sgRNAs, avoiding innate immune responses in human cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.231936.117

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, S., Koo, T., Jee, H.-G., Cho, H.-Y., Lee, G., Lim, D.-G., Shin, H. S., & Kim, J.-S.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Basic Science (KR)
  • National Medical Center (KR)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2018-02-22
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
367-373
ISSN
  • 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5469
OpenAlex
W2792675259
Cited by
222
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 13
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Institute for Basic Science (IBS-R021-D1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
CRISPR guide RNA, 5'-triphosphate RNA, RIG-I, type I interferon response, cell death, phosphatase treatment, Cas9, CRISPR/Cas12a, targeted mutagenesis, CD4+ T cells, in vitro transcription, sgRNA design
MeSH terms
DEAD Box Protein 58, Gene Editing, RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Animals, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Interferon Type I, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Mice, HEK293 Cells, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review