The DOI matches its Crossref record; 128 of the 128 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing the human and chimpanzee genomes: Searching for needles in a haystack
Open accessAbstract
The chimpanzee genome sequence is a long-awaited milestone, providing opportunities to explore primate evolution and genetic contributions to human physiology and disease. Humans and chimpanzees shared a common ancestor ∼5-7 million years ago (Mya). The difference between the two genomes is actually not ∼1%, but ∼4%—comprising ∼35 million single nucleotide differences and ∼90 Mb of insertions and deletions. The challenge is to identify the many evolutionarily, physiologically, and biomedically important differences scattered throughout these genomes while integrating these data with emerging knowledge about the corresponding “phenomes” and the relevant environmental influences. It is logical to tackle the genetic aspects via both genome-wide analyses and candidate gene studies. Genome-wide surveys could eliminate the majority of genomic sequence differences from consideration, while simultaneously identifying potential targets of opportunity. Meanwhile, candidate gene approaches can be based on such genomic surveys, on genes that may contribute to known differences in phenotypes or disease incidence/severity, or on mutations in the human population that impact unique aspects of the human condition. These two approaches will intersect at many levels and should be considered complementary. We also cite some known genetic differences between humans and great apes, realizing that these likely represent only the tip of the iceberg.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, C. F. G. R., Lander, E. S., Linton, L. M., Birren, B., Nusbaum, C., Zody, M. C., Baldwin, J., Devon, K., Dewar, K., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057062 · Cited by 24,216
Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03001 · Cited by 4,971
Correlation between Protein and mRNA Abundance in Yeast
Gygi, S. P., Rochon, Y., Franza, B. R., & Aebersold, R. (1999) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.19.3.1720 · Cited by 3,819
King, M.-C., & Wilson, A. C. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1090005 · Cited by 2,815
MicroRNA biogenesis: coordinated cropping and dicing
Kim, V. N. (2005) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1644 · Cited by 2,546
Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome
The Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04072 · Cited by 2,459
Statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation
Yang, Z., & Bielawski, J. P. (2000) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01994-7 · Cited by 1,806
Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language
Enard, W., Przeworski, M., Fisher, S. E., Lai, C. S. L., Wiebe, V., Kitano, T., Monaco, A. P., & Pääbo, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01025 · Cited by 1,603
Non–coding RNA genes and the modern RNA world
Eddy, S. R. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35103511 · Cited by 1,426
Cited by
Glycan-based interactions involving vertebrate sialic-acid-recognizing proteins
Varki, A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05816 · Cited by 853
Self-citationHuman-specific loss of regulatory DNA and the evolution of human-specific traits
McLean, C. Y., Reno, P. L., Pollen, A. A., Bassan, A. I., Capellini, T. D., Guenther, C., Indjeian, V. B., Lim, X., Menke, D. B., Schaar, B. T., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09774 · Cited by 535
Cortical Evolution: Judge the Brain by Its Cover
Geschwind, D. H., & Rakic, P. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.045 · Cited by 519
Lineage-Specific Biology Revealed by a Finished Genome Assembly of the Mouse
Church, D. M., Goodstadt, L., Hillier, L. W., Zody, M. C., Goldstein, S., She, X., Bult, C. J., Agarwala, R., Cherry, J. L., DiCuccio, M., et al. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000112 · Cited by 503
Feldman, R., Monakhov, M., Pratt, M., & Ebstein, R. P. (2016) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.08.008 · Cited by 352
Metadata
- Authors
- Varki, A., & Altheide, T. K.
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1746-1758
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110599247
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 128
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing the human and chimpanzee genomes: Searching for needles in a haystack. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gr.3737405
- The paper
- Varki, A., & Altheide, T. K. (2005). Comparing the human and chimpanzee genomes: Searching for needles in a haystack. Genome Research. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.3737405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
