Cited by 47Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

On the transition from reconsolidation to extinction of contextual fear memories

Open access
Cassini, Lindsey F., Flavell, Charlotte R., Amaral, Olavo B., Lee, Jonathan L.C.·2017·Learning & Memory

Abstract

Retrieval of an associative memory can lead to different phenomena. Brief reexposure sessions tend to trigger reconsolidation, whereas more extended ones trigger extinction. In appetitive and fear cued Pavlovian memories, an intermediate “null point” period has been observed where neither process seems to be engaged. Here we investigated whether this phenomenon extends to contextual fear memory. Adult rats were subjected to a contextual fear conditioning paradigm, reexposed to the context 2 d later for 3, 5, 10, 20, or 30 min, with immediate injections of MK-801 or saline following reexposure, and tested on the following day. We observed a significant effect of MK-801 with the 3- and 30-min sessions, impairing reconsolidation and extinction, respectively. However, it did not have significant effects with 5-, 10-, or 20-min sessions, even though freezing decreased from reexposure to test. Further analyses indicated that this is not likely to be due to a variable transition point at the population level. In conclusion, the results show that in contextual fear memories there is a genuine “null point” between the parameters that induce reconsolidation and extinction, as defined by the effects of MK-801, although NMDA receptor-independent decreases in freezing can still occur in these conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.045724.117

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reconsolidation and extinction are separated by a 'limbo' period during which neither process is engaged.

    “the two processes are separated by a “limbo” period during which neither process is engaged (Merlo et al., 2014, 2018; Cassini et al., 2017).”

    From Retrieval-Dependent Mechanisms Affecting Emotional Memory Persistence: Reconsolidation, Extinction, and the Space in Between (2020) · cites this paper as Cassini et al., 2017

    The Discussion (page not specified) reports a genuine null point between conditions that induce reconsolidation and extinction. But it establishes that MK-801 impairs neither process at that point, not that neither process is engaged; it also notes that freezing can decline through a possible NMDA receptor-independent form of extinction. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Similar results were observed for pavlovian conditioned approach and contextual fear memories in rats, and fear memories in humans and crabs.

    “Similar results were observed for the pavlovian conditioned approach (Flavell and Lee, 2013) and contextual fear memories in rats (Cassini et al., 2017; Franzen et al., 2019), and fear memories in humans and crabs (Sevenster et al., 2014; Merlo et al., 2019)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Almeida-Corrêa S, Amaral OB. 2014. Memory labilization in reconsolidation and extinction—evidence for a common plasticity system? J Physiol Paris 108: 292– 306. 25173958
  2. Bahar A, Dorfman N, Dudai Y. 2004. Amygdalar circuits required for either consolidation or extinction of taste aversion memory are not required for reconsolidation. Eur J Neurosci 19: 1115– 1118. 15009160
  3. Barad M. 2006. Divide and conquer: an L-type voltage-gated calcium channel subtype finds a role in conditioned fear. Learn Mem 13: 560– 561. 17015854
  4. Brabant C, Charlier Y, Tirelli E. 2013. The histamine H3-receptor inverse agonist pitolisant improves fear memory in mice. Behav Brain Res 243: 199– 204. 23327739
  5. Brown TE, Lee BR, Sorg BA. 2008. The NMDA antagonist MK-801 disrupts reconsolidation of a cocaine-associated memory for conditioned place preference but not for self-administration in rats. Learn Mem 15: 857– 865. 19050157 PMC2632842
  6. Bustos SG, Maldonado H, Molina VA. 2009. Disruptive effect of midazolam on fear memory reconsolidation: decisive influence of reactivation time span and memory age. Neuropsychopharmacology 34: 446– 457. 18509330
  7. Charlier Y, Tirelli E. 2011. Differential effects of histamine H3 receptor inverse agonist thioperamide, given alone or in combination with the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist dizocilpine, on reconsolidation and consolidation of a contextual fear memory in mice. Neuroscience 193: 132– 142. 21802497
  8. de la Fuente V, Freudenthal R, Romano A. 2011. Reconsolidation or extinction: transcription factor switch in the determination of memory course after retrieval. J Neurosci 31: 5562– 5573. 21490196 PMC6622842
  9. Díaz-Mataix L, Ruiz Martinez RC, Schafe GE, LeDoux JE, Doyère V. 2013. Detection of a temporal error triggers reconsolidation of amygdala-dependent memories. Curr Biol 23: 467– 472. 23453952 PMC3606686
  10. Duvarci S, Mamou CB, Nader K. 2006. Extinction is not a sufficient condition to prevent fear memories from undergoing reconsolidation in the basolateral amygdala. Eur J Neurosci 24: 249– 260. 16882021
  11. Eisenberg M, Kobilo T, Berman DE, Dudai Y. 2003. Stability of retrieved memory: inverse correlation with trace dominance. Science 301: 1102– 1104. 12934010
  12. Exton-McGuinness MT, Lee JL, Reichelt AC. 2015. Updating memories - the role of prediction errors in memory reconsolidation. Behav Brain Res 278: 375– 384. 25453746
  13. Flavell CR, Lee JL. 2013. Reconsolidation and extinction of an appetitive Pavlovian memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem 104: 25– 31. 23639449
  14. Heath FC, Jurkus R, Bast T, Pezze MA, Lee JL, Voigt JP, Stevenson CW. 2015. Dopamine D1-like receptor signalling in the hippocampus and amygdala modulates the acquisition of contextual fear conditioning. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 232: 2619– 2629. 25743759 PMC4480849
  15. Hu X, Wang T, Luo J, Liang S, Li W, Wu X, Jin F, Wang L. 2014. Age-dependent effect of high cholesterol diets on anxiety-like behavior in elevated plus maze test in rats. Behav Brain Funct 10: 30. 25179125 PMC4158000
  16. Jarosz AF, Wiley J. 2014. What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting bayes factors. J Probl Solv 7: 2.
  17. Kim JH, Richardson R. 2010. Extinction in preweanling rats does not involve NMDA receptors. Neurobiol Learn Mem 94: 176– 182. 20472087
  18. Langton JM, Richardson R. 2008. D-cycloserine facilitates extinction the first time but not the second time: an examination of the role of NMDA across the course of repeated extinction sessions. Neuropsychopharmacology 33: 3096– 3102. 18354389
  19. Lee JL. 2010. Memory reconsolidation mediates the updating of hippocampal memory content. Front Behav Neurosci 4: 168. 21120142 PMC2991235
  20. Lee JL, Everitt BJ. 2008. Appetitive memory reconsolidation depends upon NMDA receptor-mediated neurotransmission. Neurobiol Learn Mem 90: 147– 154. 18372198
  21. Lee JLC, Flavell CR. 2014. Inhibition and enhancement of contextual fear memory destabilisation. Front Behav Neurosci 8: 144. 24808841 PMC4009423
  22. Lee JL, Hynds RE. 2013. Divergent cellular pathways of hippocampal memory consolidation and reconsolidation. Hippocampus 23: 233– 244. 23197404 PMC3675315
  23. Lee JL, Milton AL, Everitt BJ. 2006. Reconsolidation and extinction of conditioned fear: inhibition and potentiation. J Neurosci 26: 10051– 10056. 17005868 PMC6674482
  24. Pavlov IP. 1927. Conditioned Reflexes, an investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. Oxford University Press, London. PMC4116985 25205891
  25. Reichelt AC, Lee JL. 2012. Over-expectation generated in a complex appetitive goal-tracking task is capable of inducing memory reconsolidation. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 226: 649– 658. 23239132
  26. Reichelt AC, Exton-McGuinness ME, Lee JLC. 2013. Ventral tegmental dopamine dysregulation prevents appetitive memory destabilisation. J Neurosci 33: 14205– 14210. 23986254 PMC6618505
  27. Rescorla RA, Wagner AR. 1972. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In Classical conditioning II: current research and theory, (ed. Prokasy AHBWF), pp. 64– 99. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
  28. Riebe CJ, Pamplona FA, Kamprath K, Wotjak CT. 2012. Fear relief—toward a new conceptual framework and what endocannabinoids gotta do with it. Neuroscience 204: 159– 185. 22173015
  29. Rodriguez-Ortiz CJ, De la Cruz V, Gutiérrez R, Bermudez-Rattoni F. 2005. Protein synthesis underlies post-retrieval memory consolidation to a restricted degree only when updated information is obtained. Learn Mem 12: 533– 537. 16166395 PMC1240066
  30. Rodriguez-Ortiz CJ, Garcia-DeLaTorre P, Benavidez E, Ballesteros MA, Bermudez-Rattoni F. 2008. Intrahippocampal anisomycin infusions disrupt previously consolidated spatial memory only when memory is updated. Neurobiol Learn Mem 89: 352– 359. 18054256
  31. Santini E, Muller RU, Quirk GJ. 2001. Consolidation of extinction learning involves transfer from NMDA-independent to NMDA-dependent memory. J Neurosci 21: 9009– 9017. 11698611 PMC6762277
  32. Sevenster D, Beckers T, Kindt M. 2013. Prediction error governs pharmacologically induced amnesia for learned fear. Science 339: 830– 833. 23413355
  33. Song C, Stevenson CW, Guimaraes FS, Lee JLC. 2016. Bidirectional effects of cannabidiol on contextual fear memory extinction. Front Pharmacol 7: 493. 28018227 PMC5159417
  34. Suzuki A, Josselyn SA, Frankland PW, Masushige S, Silva AJ, Kida S. 2004. Memory reconsolidation and extinction have distinct temporal and biochemical signatures. J Neurosci 24: 4787– 4795. 15152039 PMC6729467

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cassini, L. F., Flavell, C. R., Amaral, O. B., & Lee, J. L. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2017-08-16
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
392-399
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2746305777
Cited by
47
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Institutional Research Archive (University of Birmingham) (acceptedVersion)
  • Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J014982/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
contextual fear memory, memory reconsolidation, fear extinction, MK-801, NMDA receptor antagonism, freezing behavior, associative memory retrieval, rats
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Conditioning, Psychological, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Male, Memory, Dizocilpine Maleate, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Maze Learning, Freezing Reaction, Cataleptic, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review