Cited by 95Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Neural computations of threat

Open access
Levy, Ifat, Schiller, Daniela·2021·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

A host of learning, memory, and decision-making processes form the individual's response to threat and may be disrupted in anxiety and post-trauma psychopathology. Here we review the neural computations of threat, from the first encounter with a dangerous situation, through learning, storing, and updating cues that predict it, to making decisions about the optimal course of action. The overview highlights the interconnected nature of these processes and their reliance on shared neural and computational mechanisms. We propose an integrative approach to the study of threat-related processes, in which specific computations are studied across the various stages of threat experience rather than in isolation. This approach can generate new insights about the evolution, diagnosis, and treatment of threat-related psychopathology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2020.11.007

Cites

250 of 250 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Uncertainty over the change in contingency from threat to safety may prolong the learning of new safety associations generally, but particularly for individuals who find uncertainty anxiety provoking.

    “Uncertainty (also referred to as ambiguity) over the change in contingency from threat to safety may prolong the learning of new safety associations generally (13,14), but particularly for individuals who find uncertainty anxiety provoking (15).”

    From I Doubt It Is Safe: A Meta-analysis of Self-reported Intolerance of Uncertainty and Threat Extinction Training (2021) · cites this paper as [14]

    In “Decision making under threat” (page unavailable), the paper says intolerance of uncertainty in anxious individuals likely affects learning and that ambiguity aversion may hinder it. It also says extinction requires coping with uncertainty, but treats the link between uncertainty attitudes and learning as an open question; it does not specifically establish prolonged learning of new safety associations in those individuals. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 251 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [105]Gray RM (2017) The Reconsolidation of Traumatic Memories (RTM) Protocol for PTSD: a Case Study. Journal of Experiential Psychotherapy/Revista de PSIHOterapie Experientiala 20 (4).
  2. [196]Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. (2008) Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder: an assessment of the evidence, National Academies Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levy, I., & Schiller, D.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
  • Levy, Ifat
  • Schiller, Daniela
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
151-171
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3116892993
Cited by
95
References
251
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH105535, R01MH118215)
  • NSF (1829439)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
threat processing, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, threat learning, decision-making, threat prediction, neural computation, computational psychiatry, integrated approach
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Humans, Learning, Memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review