Cited by 31Memory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Inactivation of ventral hippocampus projections promotes sensitivity to changes in contingency

Open access
Barker, Jacqueline M., Bryant, Kathleen G., Chandler, L. Judson·2019·Learning & Memory

Abstract

The loss of behavioral flexibility is common across a number of neuropsychiatric illnesses. This may be in part due to the loss of the ability to detect or use changes in action–outcome contingencies to guide behavior. There is growing evidence that the ventral hippocampus plays a critical role in the regulation of flexible behavior and reward-related decision making. Here, we investigated the role of glutamatergic projections from the ventral hippocampus in the expression of contingency-mediated reward seeking. We demonstrate that selectively silencing ventral hippocampus projections can restore the use of action–outcome contingencies to guide behavior, while sparing cue-guided behavior and extinction learning. Our findings further indicated that the ability of the ventral hippocampus to promote habitual response strategies may be in part mediated by selective projections from the ventral hippocampus to the nucleus accumbens shell. Together these results implicate glutamatergic projections from the ventral hippocampus in the regulation of behavioral flexibility and suggest that alterations in ventral hippocampus function may contribute to overreliance on habitual response strategy observed in neuropsychiatric illnesses including addiction and obsessive–compulsive disorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.048025.118

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Almonte AG, Ewin SE, Mauterer MI, Morgan JW, Carter ES, Weiner JL. 2017 Enhanced ventral hippocampal synaptic transmission and impaired synaptic plasticity in a rodent model of alcohol addiction vulnerability. Sci Rep 7: 12300 10.1038/s41598-017-12531-z 28951619 PMC5615051 · DOI
  2. Barfield ET, Gerber KJ, Zimmermann KS, Ressler KJ, Parsons RG, Gourley SL. 2017 Regulation of actions and habits by ventral hippocampal trkB and adolescent corticosteroid exposure. PLoS Biol 15: e2003000 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003000 29186135 PMC5724896 · DOI
  3. Barker JM, Taylor JR. 2016 Habitual alcohol seeking: modeling the transition from casual drinking to addiction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 47: 281– 294. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.08.012 PMC4258136 25193245 · DOI
  4. Barker JM, Torregrossa MM, Taylor JR. 2013 Bidirectional modulation of infralimbic dopamine D1 and D2 receptor activity regulates flexible reward seeking. Front Neurosci 7: 126 10.3389/fnins.2013.00126 23882177 PMC3714450 · DOI
  5. Barker JM, Zhang H, Villafane JJ, Wang TL, Torregrossa MM, Taylor JR. 2014 Epigenetic and pharmacological regulation of 5HT3 receptors controls compulsive ethanol seeking in mice. Eur J Neurosci 39: 999– 1008. 10.1111/ejn.12477 24772465 PMC4004969 · DOI
  6. Barker JM, Glen WB, Linsenbardt DN, Lapish CC, Chandler LJ. 2017 Habitual behavior is mediated by a shift in response-outcome encoding by infralimbic cortex. eNeuro 4: ENEURO.0337-17.2017. 10.1523/ENEURO.0337-17.2017 PMC5752702 29302616 · DOI
  7. Britt JP, Benaliouad F, McDevitt RA, Stuber GD, Wise RA, Bonci A. 2012 Synaptic and behavioral profile of multiple glutamatergic inputs to the nucleus accumbens. Neuron 76: 790– 803. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.040 23177963 PMC3607383 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Butkovich LM, DePoy LM, Allen AG, Shapiro LP, Swanson AM, Gourley SL. 2015 Adolescent-onset GABA A α1 silencing regulates reward-related decision making. Eur J Neurosci 42: 2114– 2121. 10.1111/ejn.12995 26096050 PMC4826739 · DOI
  9. Corbit LH, Balleine BW. 2000 The role of the hippocampus in instrumental conditioning. J Neurosci 20: 4233– 4239. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-11-04233.2000 10818159 PMC6772620 · DOI
  10. Coutureau E, Killcross S. 2003 Inactivation of the infralimbic prefrontal cortex reinstates goal-directed responding in overtrained rats. Behav Brain Res 146: 167– 174. 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.09.025 14643469 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Gomez JL, Bonaventura J, Lesniak W, Mathews WB, Sysa-Shah P, Rodriguez LA, Ellis RJ, Richie CT, Harvey BK, Dannals RF, 2017 Chemogenetics revealed: DREADD occupancy and activation via converted clozapine. Science 357: 503– 507. 10.1126/science.aan2475 28774929 PMC7309169 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gourley SL, Lee AS, Howell JL, Pittenger C, Taylor JR. 2010 Dissociable regulation of instrumental action within mouse prefrontal cortex. Eur J Neurosci 32: 1726– 1734. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07438.x 21044173 PMC3058746 · DOI
  13. Gourley SL, Olevska A, Zimmermann KS, Ressler KJ, Dileone RJ, Taylor JR. 2013 The orbitofrontal cortex regulates outcome-based decision-making via the lateral striatum. Eur J Neurosci 38: 2382– 2388. 10.1111/ejn.12239 23651226 PMC3864662 · DOI
  14. Ishikawa A, Nakamura S. 2003 Convergence and interaction of hippocampal and amygdalar projections within the prefrontal cortex in the rat. J Neurosci 23: 9987– 9995. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-31-09987.2003 14602812 PMC6740854 · DOI
  15. Ito R, Lee ACH. 2016 The role of the hippocampus in approach-avoidance conflict decision-making: evidence from rodent and human studies. Behav Brain Res 313: 345– 357. 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.07.039 27457133 · DOI
  16. Killcross S, Coutureau E. 2003 Coordination of actions and habits in the medial prefrontal cortex of rats. Cereb Cortex 13: 400– 408. 10.1093/cercor/13.4.400 12631569 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Krause M, German PW, Taha SA, Fields HL. 2010 A pause in nucleus accumbens neuron firing is required to initiate and maintain feeding. J Neurosci 30: 4746– 4756. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0197-10.2010 20357125 PMC2878763 · DOI
  18. MacLaren DAA, Browne RW, Shaw JK, Krishnan Radhakrishnan S, Khare P, España RA, Clark SD. 2016 Clozapine N-oxide administration produces behavioral effects in Long-Evans rats: implications for designing DREADD experiments. eNeuro 3: ENEURO.0219-16.2016 10.1523/ENEURO.0219-16.2016 PMC5089539 27822508 · DOI
  19. Mahler SV, Aston-Jones G. 2018 CNO evil? Considerations for the use of DREADDs in behavioral neuroscience. Neuropsychopharmacology 43: 934– 936. 10.1038/npp.2017.299 29303143 PMC5854815 · DOI
  20. Manvich DF, Webster KA, Foster SL, Farrell MS, Ritchie JC, Porter JH, Weinshenker D. 2018 The DREADD agonist clozapine N-oxide (CNO) is reverse-metabolized to clozapine and produces clozapine-like interoceptive stimulus effects in rats and mice. Sci Rep 8: 3840 10.1038/s41598-018-22116-z 29497149 PMC5832819 · DOI
  21. Millan EZ, Kim HA, Janak PH. 2017 Optogenetic activation of amygdala projections to nucleus accumbens can arrest conditioned and unconditioned alcohol consummatory behavior. Neuroscience 360: 106– 117. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.07.044 28757250 PMC5752133 · DOI
  22. Ouhaz Z, Ba-M'hamed S, Bennis M. 2014 Haloperidol treatment at pre-exposure phase reduces the disturbance of latent inhibition in rats with neonatal ventral hippocampus lesions. C R Biol 337: 561– 570. 10.1016/J.CRVI.2014.07.005 25282171 · DOI
  23. Pennartz CMA, Ito R, Verschure PF, Battaglia FP, Robbins TW. 2011 The hippocampal-striatal axis in learning, prediction and goal-directed behavior. Trends Neurosci 34: 548– 559. 10.1016/j.tins.2011.08.001 21889806 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Riaz S, Schumacher A, Sivagurunathan S, Van Der Meer M, Ito R. 2017 Ventral, but not dorsal, hippocampus inactivation impairs reward memory expression and retrieval in contexts defined by proximal cues. Hippocampus 27: 822– 836. 10.1002/hipo.22734 28449268 · DOI
  25. Schmajuk NA, Cox L, Gray JA. 2001 Nucleus accumbens, entorhinal cortex and latent inhibition: a neural network model. Behav Brain Res 118: 123– 141. 10.1016/S0166-4328(00)00319-3 11164510 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Serlin H, Torregrossa MM. 2014 Adolescent rats are resistant to forming ethanol seeking habits. Dev Cogn Neurosci 16: 183– 190. 10.1016/j.dcn.2014.12.002 25575668 PMC4480209 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Smith KS, Graybiel AM. 2013 A dual operator view of habitual behavior reflecting cortical and striatal dynamics. Neuron 79: 361– 374. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.05.038 23810540 PMC3951965 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Smith KS, Virkud A, Deisseroth K, Graybiel AM. 2012 Reversible online control of habitual behavior by optogenetic perturbation of medial prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109: 18932– 18937. 10.1073/pnas.1216264109 23112197 PMC3503190 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Tran-Tu-Yen DA, Marchand AR, Pape JR, Di Scala G, Coutureau E. 2009 Transient role of the rat prelimbic cortex in goal-directed behaviour. Eur J Neurosci 30: 464– 471. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06834.x 19614748 · DOI
  30. Weiner I, Feldon J. 1997 The switching model of latent inhibition: an update of neural substrates. Behav Brain Res 88: 11– 25. 10.1016/S0166-4328(97)02314-0 9401704 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Yin HH, Ostlund SB, Knowlton BJ, Balleine BW. 2005 The role of the dorsomedial striatum in instrumental conditioning. Eur J Neurosci 22: 513– 523. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04218.x 16045504 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Yin HH, Knowlton BJ, Balleine BW. 2006 Inactivation of dorsolateral striatum enhances sensitivity to changes in the action–outcome contingency in instrumental conditioning. Behav Brain Res 166: 189– 196. 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.07.012 16153716 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barker, J. M., Bryant, K. G., & Chandler, L. J.
Affiliations
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2018-12-17
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2903580842
Cited by
31
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (AA024499, AA019967, AA022701, AA010761)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
ventral hippocampus, glutamatergic projections, behavioral flexibility, contingency learning, action-outcome contingency, reward seeking, nucleus accumbens shell, habit formation, extinction learning, addiction, obsessive-compulsive disorder
MeSH terms
Animals, Conditioning, Classical, Conditioning, Operant, Extinction, Psychological, Hippocampus, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neural Pathways, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review