PreprintCited by 90Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Prefrontal cortex lesions and sex differences in fear extinction and perseveration

Open access
Baran, Sarah E., Armstrong, Charles E., Niren, Danielle C., Conrad, Cheryl D.·2010·Learning & Memory

Abstract

Electrolytic lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex (PFCX) were examined using fear conditioning to assess the recall of fear extinction and performance in the Y-maze, open field, and object location/recognition in male and female Sprague-Dawley rats. Rats were conditioned to seven tone/footshocks, followed by extinction after 1-h and 24-h delays, revealing PFCX effects and sex differences during all phases of fear conditioning. In male rats, PFCX impaired 24-h recall of fear extinction to tone, which required the 1-h delay extinction and was not attributed to nonassociative factors. In contrast, sham and PFCX females increased freezing to tone following a 24-h delay, whether or not 1-h delay tone extinction was presented. Moreover, PFCX females failed to extinguish to tone, contrasting to the robust extinction to tone that was observed for sham females, PFCX, and sham males. Also, sex differences were found during acquisition, with sham females acquiring fear conditioning slower than PFCX females. By the last tone-shock presentation, sham and PFCX females showed a slight but significant reduction in freezing to tone relative to those of sham and PFCX males. Of the other behavioral measures, PFCX females maintained exploration of a novel object during object recognition when sham females habituated. PFCX did not influence other behaviors in the remaining tasks. These findings show important sex differences in PFC function, with the PFC influencing the recall of fear extinction in males and contributing to the acquisition and maintenance of fear extinction memory in females, perhaps through altering perseveration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.1778010

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Squire LR, Bloom FE, McConnell SK, Roberts JL, Spitzer NC, Zigmond MJ. 2003. Fundamental neuroscience. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baran, S. E., Armstrong, C. E., Niren, D. C., & Conrad, C. D.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2010-05
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
267-278
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2137393164
Cited by
90
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Arizona Biomedical Research Commission
  • School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University
  • U.S. Public Health Service (NIMH 64727)
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
medial prefrontal cortex, fear extinction, sex differences, fear conditioning, perseveration, object recognition memory, electrolytic lesions, freezing behavior, fear acquisition
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Avoidance Learning, Brain Injuries, Disease Models, Animal, Electroshock, Exploratory Behavior, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Female, Male, Sex Characteristics, Time Factors, Prefrontal Cortex, Maze Learning, Recognition, Psychology, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review