The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conditioned fear extinction and reinstatement in a human fear-potentiated startle paradigm
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze fear extinction and reinstatement in humans using fear-potentiated startle. Participants were fear conditioned using a simple discrimination procedure with colored lights as the conditioned stimuli (CSs) and an airblast to the throat as the unconditioned stimulus (US). Participants were extinguished 24 h after fear conditioning. Upon presentation of unsignaled USs after extinction, participants displayed significant fear reinstatement. In summary, these procedures produced robust fear-potentiated startle, significant CS+/CS− discrimination, within-session extinction, and significant reinstatement. This is the first demonstration of fear extinction and reinstatement in humans using startle measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Both shock and airpuffs evoke robust and reliable cued fear-potentiated startle (Grillon and Ameli, 1998a; Norrholm et al, 2006).”
From Phasic vs Sustained Fear in Rats and Humans: Role of the Extended Amygdala in Fear vs Anxiety (2010) · cites this paper as Norrholm et al, 2006
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Alterations in fear extinction, fear inhibition, and stimulus generalization have all been reported, using fear-potentiated startle methods, in populations with trauma- and stressor-related as well as anxiety disorders [see Figure 1; (16, 29–31)].”
From Conditioned fear associated phenotypes as robust, translational indices of trauma-, stressor-, and anxiety-related behaviors (2014) · cites this paper as [30]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention.
Lang, P. J. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.50.5.372 · Cited by 2,876
The role of the amygdala in fear and anxiety
Davis, M. (1992) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.15.030192.002033 · Cited by 2,357
Self-citationContext and Behavioral Processes in Extinction: Table 1.
Bouton, M. E. (2004) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.78804 · Cited by 1,808
Effects of an expanding-spaced vs massed exposure schedule on fear reduction and return of fear
Rowe, M. K., & Craske, M. G. (1998) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(97)10016-x · Cited by 1,782
Phelps, E. A., Delgado, M. R., Nearing, K. I., & LeDoux, J. E. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.042 · Cited by 1,753
LaBar, K. S., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., LeDoux, J. E., & Phelps, E. A. (1998) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80475-4 · Cited by 1,402
Behavioral and Neural Analysis of Extinction
Myers, K. M., & Davis, M. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01064-4 · Cited by 918
Self-citationWalker, D. L., Ressler, K. J., Lu, K.-T., & Davis, M. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-06-02343.2002 · Cited by 815
Self-citationBouton, M. E., & King, D. A. (1983) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes · doi:10.1037/0097-7403.9.3.248 · Cited by 796
Reinstatement of fear to an extinguished conditioned stimulus.
Rescorla, R. A., & Heth, C. D. (1975) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes · doi:10.1037/0097-7403.1.1.88 · Cited by 768
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phasic vs Sustained Fear in Rats and Humans: Role of the Extended Amygdala in Fear vs Anxiety
Davis, M., Walker, D. L., Miles, L., & Grillon, C. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.109 · Cited by 1,513
“Both shock and airpuffs evoke robust and reliable cued fear-potentiated startle (Grillon and Ameli, 1998a; Norrholm et al, 2006).”
BackgroundSelf-citationFear Extinction as a Model for Translational Neuroscience: Ten Years of Progress
Milad, M. R., & Quirk, G. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131631 · Cited by 1,466
Beyond extinction: erasing human fear responses and preventing the return of fear
Kindt, M., Soeter, M., & Vervliet, B. (2009) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2271 · Cited by 826
Self-citationFear Extinction and Relapse: State of the Art
Vervliet, B., Craske, M. G., & Hermans, D. (2013) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185542 · Cited by 671
Self-citationImpaired safety signal learning may be a biomarker of PTSD
Jovanovic, T., Kazama, A., Bachevalier, J., & Davis, M. (2012) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.02.023 · Cited by 473
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Norrholm, S. D., Jovanovic, T., Vervliet, B., Myers, K. M., Davis, M., Rothbaum, B. O., & Duncan, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Venue
- Learning & Memory
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 681-685
- ISSN
- 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5485
- PMC
- PMC3746591
- OpenAlex
- W2102103246
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (9876754)
- Woodruff Foundation
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Emory University
- National Institutes of Health (5r24mh067314-03)
- School of Medicine, Emory University
- National Institute of Mental Health (1R24MH067314-01A1, MH 47840, R37MH047840, R24 MH067314)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Keywords
- fear extinction, fear reinstatement, fear-potentiated startle, fear conditioning, air blast, startle response
- MeSH terms
- Conditioning, Classical, Discrimination Learning, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Humans, Psychopharmacology, Psychophysics, Set, Psychology, Reflex, Startle
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
